The Quantitative Grammar and Poetics of Finite Verb Forms in the Guslʹ Dobroglasnaia by Simeon Polotsky

The paper offers data on the quantity and structure of finite verbal forms in Simeon Polotsky’s collection Guslʹ Dobroglasnaia. The results are compared to data from twenty epinician odes by Mikhail Lomonosov and ten odes by Gavriil Derzhavin. We find 851 personal forms in Simeon’s collection, of wh...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fedor N. Dviniatin
Format: Article
Language:Bulgarian
Published: Moscow State University of Education 2015-08-01
Series:Slovene
Subjects:
Online Access:http://slovene.ru/ojs/index.php/slovene/article/view/76
_version_ 1818676208385130496
author Fedor N. Dviniatin
author_facet Fedor N. Dviniatin
author_sort Fedor N. Dviniatin
collection DOAJ
description The paper offers data on the quantity and structure of finite verbal forms in Simeon Polotsky’s collection Guslʹ Dobroglasnaia. The results are compared to data from twenty epinician odes by Mikhail Lomonosov and ten odes by Gavriil Derzhavin. We find 851 personal forms in Simeon’s collection, of which 214 belong to past tenses (73 to imperfect, 92 to aorist, 49 to past tense with l morpheme); 363 belong to present tense; 99 to future tense; 51 to imperative mood; 6 to conjunctive mood; and 118 to the forms with the da particle. The total percentage of past tenses in Simeon’s texts (25.1%) is close to the parameters appearing in Lomonosov’s and Derzhavin’s texts (21.4% and 23.5%, respectively), and the same is true for the percentages of non-indicative moods (20.5% vs. 19.1% and 20.5%). Simeon Polotsky’s texts contain fewer present tense forms than those written by the 18th-century poets (42.8% vs. 50.6% and 49.5%), but they contain more future tense forms (11.6% vs. 8.9% and 6.5%). Past tense forms in Simeon’s texts with l suffix include 29 forms of the third person with the auxiliary iestʹ verb, usually given in a rhyme position. In the aorist, the proportion of imperfective and perfective forms to the forms of the byti verb is 9:72:11; in imperfect, this proportion is 52:6:15; and in past tenses with l suffix, it is 8:38:3. We find 99 forms of the future tense, broken down as follows: 69 are forms of simple future; 12 are accompanied by imatʹ and similar forms; and 18 are accompanied by budet and similar forms (there is no semantic difference between these two last cases). Of the forms containing the da particle, 65 belong to present tense, 37 belong to future tense, and 16 are accompanied by byti forms.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T08:39:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-49ccc9378c84446ba09baa4eed78bfa2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2304-0785
2305-6754
language Bulgarian
last_indexed 2024-12-17T08:39:49Z
publishDate 2015-08-01
publisher Moscow State University of Education
record_format Article
series Slovene
spelling doaj.art-49ccc9378c84446ba09baa4eed78bfa22022-12-21T21:56:23ZbulMoscow State University of EducationSlovene2304-07852305-67542015-08-014167The Quantitative Grammar and Poetics of Finite Verb Forms in the Guslʹ Dobroglasnaia by Simeon PolotskyFedor N. Dviniatin0С.-Петербургский государственный университетThe paper offers data on the quantity and structure of finite verbal forms in Simeon Polotsky’s collection Guslʹ Dobroglasnaia. The results are compared to data from twenty epinician odes by Mikhail Lomonosov and ten odes by Gavriil Derzhavin. We find 851 personal forms in Simeon’s collection, of which 214 belong to past tenses (73 to imperfect, 92 to aorist, 49 to past tense with l morpheme); 363 belong to present tense; 99 to future tense; 51 to imperative mood; 6 to conjunctive mood; and 118 to the forms with the da particle. The total percentage of past tenses in Simeon’s texts (25.1%) is close to the parameters appearing in Lomonosov’s and Derzhavin’s texts (21.4% and 23.5%, respectively), and the same is true for the percentages of non-indicative moods (20.5% vs. 19.1% and 20.5%). Simeon Polotsky’s texts contain fewer present tense forms than those written by the 18th-century poets (42.8% vs. 50.6% and 49.5%), but they contain more future tense forms (11.6% vs. 8.9% and 6.5%). Past tense forms in Simeon’s texts with l suffix include 29 forms of the third person with the auxiliary iestʹ verb, usually given in a rhyme position. In the aorist, the proportion of imperfective and perfective forms to the forms of the byti verb is 9:72:11; in imperfect, this proportion is 52:6:15; and in past tenses with l suffix, it is 8:38:3. We find 99 forms of the future tense, broken down as follows: 69 are forms of simple future; 12 are accompanied by imatʹ and similar forms; and 18 are accompanied by budet and similar forms (there is no semantic difference between these two last cases). Of the forms containing the da particle, 65 belong to present tense, 37 belong to future tense, and 16 are accompanied by byti forms.http://slovene.ru/ojs/index.php/slovene/article/view/76грамматикапоэтикаструктура текстаглаголпоэзияколичественная грамматика поэтического текстаСимеон Полоцкийдревнерусский языкцерковнославянский языкXVII век
spellingShingle Fedor N. Dviniatin
The Quantitative Grammar and Poetics of Finite Verb Forms in the Guslʹ Dobroglasnaia by Simeon Polotsky
Slovene
грамматика
поэтика
структура текста
глагол
поэзия
количественная грамматика поэтического текста
Симеон Полоцкий
древнерусский язык
церковнославянский язык
XVII век
title The Quantitative Grammar and Poetics of Finite Verb Forms in the Guslʹ Dobroglasnaia by Simeon Polotsky
title_full The Quantitative Grammar and Poetics of Finite Verb Forms in the Guslʹ Dobroglasnaia by Simeon Polotsky
title_fullStr The Quantitative Grammar and Poetics of Finite Verb Forms in the Guslʹ Dobroglasnaia by Simeon Polotsky
title_full_unstemmed The Quantitative Grammar and Poetics of Finite Verb Forms in the Guslʹ Dobroglasnaia by Simeon Polotsky
title_short The Quantitative Grammar and Poetics of Finite Verb Forms in the Guslʹ Dobroglasnaia by Simeon Polotsky
title_sort quantitative grammar and poetics of finite verb forms in the gusl dobroglasnaia by simeon polotsky
topic грамматика
поэтика
структура текста
глагол
поэзия
количественная грамматика поэтического текста
Симеон Полоцкий
древнерусский язык
церковнославянский язык
XVII век
url http://slovene.ru/ojs/index.php/slovene/article/view/76
work_keys_str_mv AT fedorndviniatin thequantitativegrammarandpoeticsoffiniteverbformsintheguslʹdobroglasnaiabysimeonpolotsky
AT fedorndviniatin quantitativegrammarandpoeticsoffiniteverbformsintheguslʹdobroglasnaiabysimeonpolotsky