Effect of vaccines and antivirals during the major 2009 A(H1N1) pandemic wave in Norway--and the influence of vaccination timing.

To evaluate the impact of mass vaccination with adjuvanted vaccines (eventually 40% population coverage) and antivirals during the 2009 influenza pandemic in Norway, we fitted an age-structured SEIR model using data on vaccinations and sales of antivirals in 2009/10 in Norway to Norwegian ILI survei...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Birgitte Freiesleben de Blasio, Bjørn G Iversen, Gianpaolo Scalia Tomba
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/22253862/?tool=EBI
_version_ 1818460712625766400
author Birgitte Freiesleben de Blasio
Bjørn G Iversen
Gianpaolo Scalia Tomba
author_facet Birgitte Freiesleben de Blasio
Bjørn G Iversen
Gianpaolo Scalia Tomba
author_sort Birgitte Freiesleben de Blasio
collection DOAJ
description To evaluate the impact of mass vaccination with adjuvanted vaccines (eventually 40% population coverage) and antivirals during the 2009 influenza pandemic in Norway, we fitted an age-structured SEIR model using data on vaccinations and sales of antivirals in 2009/10 in Norway to Norwegian ILI surveillance data from 5 October 2009 to 4 January 2010. We estimate a clinical attack rate of approximately 30% (28.7-29.8%), with highest disease rates among children 0-14 years (43-44%). Vaccination started in week 43 and came too late to have a strong influence on the pandemic in Norway. Our results indicate that the countermeasures prevented approximately 11-12% of potential cases relative to an unmitigated pandemic. Vaccination was found responsible for roughly 3 in 4 of the avoided infections. An estimated 50% reduction in the clinical attack rate would have resulted from vaccination alone, had the campaign started 6 weeks earlier. Had vaccination been prioritized for children first, the intervention should have commenced approximately 5 weeks earlier in order to achieve the same 50% reduction. In comparison, we estimate that a non-adjuvanted vaccination program should have started 8 weeks earlier to lower the clinical attack rate by 50%. In conclusion, vaccination timing was a critical factor in relation to the spread of the 2009 A(H1N1) influenza. Our results also corroborate the central role of children for the transmission of A(H1N1) pandemic influenza.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T23:34:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-49d191d8c84b45778a95a6a75f441f1a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T23:34:37Z
publishDate 2012-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-49d191d8c84b45778a95a6a75f441f1a2022-12-21T22:43:38ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032012-01-0171e3001810.1371/journal.pone.0030018Effect of vaccines and antivirals during the major 2009 A(H1N1) pandemic wave in Norway--and the influence of vaccination timing.Birgitte Freiesleben de BlasioBjørn G IversenGianpaolo Scalia TombaTo evaluate the impact of mass vaccination with adjuvanted vaccines (eventually 40% population coverage) and antivirals during the 2009 influenza pandemic in Norway, we fitted an age-structured SEIR model using data on vaccinations and sales of antivirals in 2009/10 in Norway to Norwegian ILI surveillance data from 5 October 2009 to 4 January 2010. We estimate a clinical attack rate of approximately 30% (28.7-29.8%), with highest disease rates among children 0-14 years (43-44%). Vaccination started in week 43 and came too late to have a strong influence on the pandemic in Norway. Our results indicate that the countermeasures prevented approximately 11-12% of potential cases relative to an unmitigated pandemic. Vaccination was found responsible for roughly 3 in 4 of the avoided infections. An estimated 50% reduction in the clinical attack rate would have resulted from vaccination alone, had the campaign started 6 weeks earlier. Had vaccination been prioritized for children first, the intervention should have commenced approximately 5 weeks earlier in order to achieve the same 50% reduction. In comparison, we estimate that a non-adjuvanted vaccination program should have started 8 weeks earlier to lower the clinical attack rate by 50%. In conclusion, vaccination timing was a critical factor in relation to the spread of the 2009 A(H1N1) influenza. Our results also corroborate the central role of children for the transmission of A(H1N1) pandemic influenza.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/22253862/?tool=EBI
spellingShingle Birgitte Freiesleben de Blasio
Bjørn G Iversen
Gianpaolo Scalia Tomba
Effect of vaccines and antivirals during the major 2009 A(H1N1) pandemic wave in Norway--and the influence of vaccination timing.
PLoS ONE
title Effect of vaccines and antivirals during the major 2009 A(H1N1) pandemic wave in Norway--and the influence of vaccination timing.
title_full Effect of vaccines and antivirals during the major 2009 A(H1N1) pandemic wave in Norway--and the influence of vaccination timing.
title_fullStr Effect of vaccines and antivirals during the major 2009 A(H1N1) pandemic wave in Norway--and the influence of vaccination timing.
title_full_unstemmed Effect of vaccines and antivirals during the major 2009 A(H1N1) pandemic wave in Norway--and the influence of vaccination timing.
title_short Effect of vaccines and antivirals during the major 2009 A(H1N1) pandemic wave in Norway--and the influence of vaccination timing.
title_sort effect of vaccines and antivirals during the major 2009 a h1n1 pandemic wave in norway and the influence of vaccination timing
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/22253862/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT birgittefreieslebendeblasio effectofvaccinesandantiviralsduringthemajor2009ah1n1pandemicwaveinnorwayandtheinfluenceofvaccinationtiming
AT bjørngiversen effectofvaccinesandantiviralsduringthemajor2009ah1n1pandemicwaveinnorwayandtheinfluenceofvaccinationtiming
AT gianpaoloscaliatomba effectofvaccinesandantiviralsduringthemajor2009ah1n1pandemicwaveinnorwayandtheinfluenceofvaccinationtiming