Legitimising and Delegitimising Women Coaches in the Golf Industry: Women Golf Professionals’ Experiences of Advocacy
The underrepresentation of women in sport coaching continues to be recognised by researchers and some international organisations. Golf too suffers from a dramatic underrepresentation of women coaches. The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of women golf coaches and how they naviga...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2023-11-01
|
Series: | Social Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/11/617 |
_version_ | 1797457679402139648 |
---|---|
author | Alex Mollin Justine Allen April Henning |
author_facet | Alex Mollin Justine Allen April Henning |
author_sort | Alex Mollin |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The underrepresentation of women in sport coaching continues to be recognised by researchers and some international organisations. Golf too suffers from a dramatic underrepresentation of women coaches. The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of women golf coaches and how they navigate this male-dominated coaching domain with a particular focus on experiences of advocacy. The research was designed to qualitatively capture women PGA Professionals’ lived experiences. Women PGA Professionals (N = 11) with 10–34 years of experience (M = 19.8) participated in semi-structured interviews that were structured on the four Ecological Systems Theory (EST) layers. Data were thematically analysed using the EST layers for initial categorization. From this, four themes were developed: recruitment and opportunity; on the course and in the pro shop; perceptions of women PGA Professionals; and advocacy and allies. The themes were part of two related processes: legitimisation and delegitimisation. These dual processes work to either validate women coaches—both as individuals and as a collective—or to undermine them within the profession, respectively, and operate over the four EST layers. Further, these processes are not always discreet and the two may overlap in unanticipated ways. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-09T16:27:19Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-49d20bbc5cbe472590d77f2235f58892 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2076-0760 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-09T16:27:19Z |
publishDate | 2023-11-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Social Sciences |
spelling | doaj.art-49d20bbc5cbe472590d77f2235f588922023-11-24T15:06:26ZengMDPI AGSocial Sciences2076-07602023-11-01121161710.3390/socsci12110617Legitimising and Delegitimising Women Coaches in the Golf Industry: Women Golf Professionals’ Experiences of AdvocacyAlex Mollin0Justine Allen1April Henning2AMP Golf Performance, Jersey JE3 7BR, UKDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST, UKEdinburgh Business School, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, UKThe underrepresentation of women in sport coaching continues to be recognised by researchers and some international organisations. Golf too suffers from a dramatic underrepresentation of women coaches. The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of women golf coaches and how they navigate this male-dominated coaching domain with a particular focus on experiences of advocacy. The research was designed to qualitatively capture women PGA Professionals’ lived experiences. Women PGA Professionals (N = 11) with 10–34 years of experience (M = 19.8) participated in semi-structured interviews that were structured on the four Ecological Systems Theory (EST) layers. Data were thematically analysed using the EST layers for initial categorization. From this, four themes were developed: recruitment and opportunity; on the course and in the pro shop; perceptions of women PGA Professionals; and advocacy and allies. The themes were part of two related processes: legitimisation and delegitimisation. These dual processes work to either validate women coaches—both as individuals and as a collective—or to undermine them within the profession, respectively, and operate over the four EST layers. Further, these processes are not always discreet and the two may overlap in unanticipated ways.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/11/617coachingPGAecological systems theorywomenadvocacyallyship |
spellingShingle | Alex Mollin Justine Allen April Henning Legitimising and Delegitimising Women Coaches in the Golf Industry: Women Golf Professionals’ Experiences of Advocacy Social Sciences coaching PGA ecological systems theory women advocacy allyship |
title | Legitimising and Delegitimising Women Coaches in the Golf Industry: Women Golf Professionals’ Experiences of Advocacy |
title_full | Legitimising and Delegitimising Women Coaches in the Golf Industry: Women Golf Professionals’ Experiences of Advocacy |
title_fullStr | Legitimising and Delegitimising Women Coaches in the Golf Industry: Women Golf Professionals’ Experiences of Advocacy |
title_full_unstemmed | Legitimising and Delegitimising Women Coaches in the Golf Industry: Women Golf Professionals’ Experiences of Advocacy |
title_short | Legitimising and Delegitimising Women Coaches in the Golf Industry: Women Golf Professionals’ Experiences of Advocacy |
title_sort | legitimising and delegitimising women coaches in the golf industry women golf professionals experiences of advocacy |
topic | coaching PGA ecological systems theory women advocacy allyship |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/11/617 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alexmollin legitimisinganddelegitimisingwomencoachesinthegolfindustrywomengolfprofessionalsexperiencesofadvocacy AT justineallen legitimisinganddelegitimisingwomencoachesinthegolfindustrywomengolfprofessionalsexperiencesofadvocacy AT aprilhenning legitimisinganddelegitimisingwomencoachesinthegolfindustrywomengolfprofessionalsexperiencesofadvocacy |