Legitimising and Delegitimising Women Coaches in the Golf Industry: Women Golf Professionals’ Experiences of Advocacy

The underrepresentation of women in sport coaching continues to be recognised by researchers and some international organisations. Golf too suffers from a dramatic underrepresentation of women coaches. The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of women golf coaches and how they naviga...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alex Mollin, Justine Allen, April Henning
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-11-01
Series:Social Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/11/617
_version_ 1797457679402139648
author Alex Mollin
Justine Allen
April Henning
author_facet Alex Mollin
Justine Allen
April Henning
author_sort Alex Mollin
collection DOAJ
description The underrepresentation of women in sport coaching continues to be recognised by researchers and some international organisations. Golf too suffers from a dramatic underrepresentation of women coaches. The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of women golf coaches and how they navigate this male-dominated coaching domain with a particular focus on experiences of advocacy. The research was designed to qualitatively capture women PGA Professionals’ lived experiences. Women PGA Professionals (N = 11) with 10–34 years of experience (M = 19.8) participated in semi-structured interviews that were structured on the four Ecological Systems Theory (EST) layers. Data were thematically analysed using the EST layers for initial categorization. From this, four themes were developed: recruitment and opportunity; on the course and in the pro shop; perceptions of women PGA Professionals; and advocacy and allies. The themes were part of two related processes: legitimisation and delegitimisation. These dual processes work to either validate women coaches—both as individuals and as a collective—or to undermine them within the profession, respectively, and operate over the four EST layers. Further, these processes are not always discreet and the two may overlap in unanticipated ways.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T16:27:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-49d20bbc5cbe472590d77f2235f58892
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-0760
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T16:27:19Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Social Sciences
spelling doaj.art-49d20bbc5cbe472590d77f2235f588922023-11-24T15:06:26ZengMDPI AGSocial Sciences2076-07602023-11-01121161710.3390/socsci12110617Legitimising and Delegitimising Women Coaches in the Golf Industry: Women Golf Professionals’ Experiences of AdvocacyAlex Mollin0Justine Allen1April Henning2AMP Golf Performance, Jersey JE3 7BR, UKDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST, UKEdinburgh Business School, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, UKThe underrepresentation of women in sport coaching continues to be recognised by researchers and some international organisations. Golf too suffers from a dramatic underrepresentation of women coaches. The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of women golf coaches and how they navigate this male-dominated coaching domain with a particular focus on experiences of advocacy. The research was designed to qualitatively capture women PGA Professionals’ lived experiences. Women PGA Professionals (N = 11) with 10–34 years of experience (M = 19.8) participated in semi-structured interviews that were structured on the four Ecological Systems Theory (EST) layers. Data were thematically analysed using the EST layers for initial categorization. From this, four themes were developed: recruitment and opportunity; on the course and in the pro shop; perceptions of women PGA Professionals; and advocacy and allies. The themes were part of two related processes: legitimisation and delegitimisation. These dual processes work to either validate women coaches—both as individuals and as a collective—or to undermine them within the profession, respectively, and operate over the four EST layers. Further, these processes are not always discreet and the two may overlap in unanticipated ways.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/11/617coachingPGAecological systems theorywomenadvocacyallyship
spellingShingle Alex Mollin
Justine Allen
April Henning
Legitimising and Delegitimising Women Coaches in the Golf Industry: Women Golf Professionals’ Experiences of Advocacy
Social Sciences
coaching
PGA
ecological systems theory
women
advocacy
allyship
title Legitimising and Delegitimising Women Coaches in the Golf Industry: Women Golf Professionals’ Experiences of Advocacy
title_full Legitimising and Delegitimising Women Coaches in the Golf Industry: Women Golf Professionals’ Experiences of Advocacy
title_fullStr Legitimising and Delegitimising Women Coaches in the Golf Industry: Women Golf Professionals’ Experiences of Advocacy
title_full_unstemmed Legitimising and Delegitimising Women Coaches in the Golf Industry: Women Golf Professionals’ Experiences of Advocacy
title_short Legitimising and Delegitimising Women Coaches in the Golf Industry: Women Golf Professionals’ Experiences of Advocacy
title_sort legitimising and delegitimising women coaches in the golf industry women golf professionals experiences of advocacy
topic coaching
PGA
ecological systems theory
women
advocacy
allyship
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/11/617
work_keys_str_mv AT alexmollin legitimisinganddelegitimisingwomencoachesinthegolfindustrywomengolfprofessionalsexperiencesofadvocacy
AT justineallen legitimisinganddelegitimisingwomencoachesinthegolfindustrywomengolfprofessionalsexperiencesofadvocacy
AT aprilhenning legitimisinganddelegitimisingwomencoachesinthegolfindustrywomengolfprofessionalsexperiencesofadvocacy