Quantifying Tree Diversity, Carbon Stocks, and Sequestration Potential for Diverse Land Uses in Northeast India

In the modern era, rapid anthropogenic activities in the vicinity of the Himalayas disturb the carbon sequestration potential resulting in climate change. For the first time, this study estimates the biomass and carbon storage potential of Northeast India’s diverse land uses through a biomass estima...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Uttam Kumar Sahoo, Om Prakash Tripathi, Arun Jyoti Nath, Sourabh Deb, Dhruba Jyoti Das, Asha Gupta, N. Bijayalaxmi Devi, Shiva Shankar Charturvedi, Soibam Lanabir Singh, Amit Kumar, Brajesh Kumar Tiwari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Environmental Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2021.724950/full
_version_ 1818724135037042688
author Uttam Kumar Sahoo
Om Prakash Tripathi
Arun Jyoti Nath
Sourabh Deb
Dhruba Jyoti Das
Asha Gupta
N. Bijayalaxmi Devi
Shiva Shankar Charturvedi
Soibam Lanabir Singh
Soibam Lanabir Singh
Amit Kumar
Brajesh Kumar Tiwari
author_facet Uttam Kumar Sahoo
Om Prakash Tripathi
Arun Jyoti Nath
Sourabh Deb
Dhruba Jyoti Das
Asha Gupta
N. Bijayalaxmi Devi
Shiva Shankar Charturvedi
Soibam Lanabir Singh
Soibam Lanabir Singh
Amit Kumar
Brajesh Kumar Tiwari
author_sort Uttam Kumar Sahoo
collection DOAJ
description In the modern era, rapid anthropogenic activities in the vicinity of the Himalayas disturb the carbon sequestration potential resulting in climate change. For the first time, this study estimates the biomass and carbon storage potential of Northeast India’s diverse land uses through a biomass estimation model developed for this region. The mean tree density in tropical, subtropical, and temperate forests was 539, 554, and 638 trees ha−1, respectively. The mean vegetation carbon stock was the highest for temperate forests (122.09 Mg C ha−1), followed by subtropical plantations (115.45 Mg C ha−1), subtropical forests (106.01 Mg C ha−1), tropical forests (105.33 Mg C ha−1), tropical plantations (93.00 Mg C ha−1), and temperate plantations (50.10 Mg C ha−1). Among the forests, the mean soil organic carbon (SOC) stock up to 45 cm depth was the highest for tropical forests (72.54 Mg C ha−1), followed by temperate forests (63.4 Mg C ha−1) and subtropical forests (42.58 Mg C ha−1). A strong relationship between the tree basal area and biomass carbon storage was found for all land-use types. The land-use transformation from agriculture to agroforestry, and grassland to plantations increased both vegetation carbon (VC) and SOC stocks. The corresponding increase in VC and SOC was 40.80 and 43.34 Mg C ha−1, respectively, in the former, and 83.18 and 97.64 Mg C ha−1 in the latter. In general, the landscape-level estimates were drawn from site-level estimates in a given land-use type, and therefore, the corresponding values might be overestimated. Nevertheless, the results provide baseline information on carbon stock which may serve as a reference for devising appropriate land-use change policies in the region.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T21:21:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-49e07e2c07b444fea5e387131e1201a3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-665X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T21:21:36Z
publishDate 2021-10-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Environmental Science
spelling doaj.art-49e07e2c07b444fea5e387131e1201a32022-12-21T21:32:11ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Environmental Science2296-665X2021-10-01910.3389/fenvs.2021.724950724950Quantifying Tree Diversity, Carbon Stocks, and Sequestration Potential for Diverse Land Uses in Northeast IndiaUttam Kumar Sahoo0Om Prakash Tripathi1Arun Jyoti Nath2Sourabh Deb3Dhruba Jyoti Das4Asha Gupta5N. Bijayalaxmi Devi6Shiva Shankar Charturvedi7Soibam Lanabir Singh8Soibam Lanabir Singh9Amit Kumar10Brajesh Kumar Tiwari11Department of Forestry, Mizoram University, Aizawl, IndiaDepartment of Forestry, North Eastern Regional Institute of Science & Technology, Itanagar, IndiaDepartment of Ecology and Environment Science, Assam University, Silchar, IndiaDepartment of Forestry and Biodiversity, Tripura University, Agartala, IndiaRain Forest Research Institute, Jorhat, IndiaDepartment of Life Science, Manipur University, Imphal, IndiaDepartment of Botany, Sikkim University, Gangtok, IndiaDepartment of Environment Studies, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong, IndiaDepartment of Forestry, Mizoram University, Aizawl, IndiaDepartment of Forestry, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Bihar, India0School of Hydrology and Water Resources, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, ChinaDepartment of Environment Studies, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong, IndiaIn the modern era, rapid anthropogenic activities in the vicinity of the Himalayas disturb the carbon sequestration potential resulting in climate change. For the first time, this study estimates the biomass and carbon storage potential of Northeast India’s diverse land uses through a biomass estimation model developed for this region. The mean tree density in tropical, subtropical, and temperate forests was 539, 554, and 638 trees ha−1, respectively. The mean vegetation carbon stock was the highest for temperate forests (122.09 Mg C ha−1), followed by subtropical plantations (115.45 Mg C ha−1), subtropical forests (106.01 Mg C ha−1), tropical forests (105.33 Mg C ha−1), tropical plantations (93.00 Mg C ha−1), and temperate plantations (50.10 Mg C ha−1). Among the forests, the mean soil organic carbon (SOC) stock up to 45 cm depth was the highest for tropical forests (72.54 Mg C ha−1), followed by temperate forests (63.4 Mg C ha−1) and subtropical forests (42.58 Mg C ha−1). A strong relationship between the tree basal area and biomass carbon storage was found for all land-use types. The land-use transformation from agriculture to agroforestry, and grassland to plantations increased both vegetation carbon (VC) and SOC stocks. The corresponding increase in VC and SOC was 40.80 and 43.34 Mg C ha−1, respectively, in the former, and 83.18 and 97.64 Mg C ha−1 in the latter. In general, the landscape-level estimates were drawn from site-level estimates in a given land-use type, and therefore, the corresponding values might be overestimated. Nevertheless, the results provide baseline information on carbon stock which may serve as a reference for devising appropriate land-use change policies in the region.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2021.724950/fullbiodiversity hotspotscarbon storageforest typesland usespecies richness
spellingShingle Uttam Kumar Sahoo
Om Prakash Tripathi
Arun Jyoti Nath
Sourabh Deb
Dhruba Jyoti Das
Asha Gupta
N. Bijayalaxmi Devi
Shiva Shankar Charturvedi
Soibam Lanabir Singh
Soibam Lanabir Singh
Amit Kumar
Brajesh Kumar Tiwari
Quantifying Tree Diversity, Carbon Stocks, and Sequestration Potential for Diverse Land Uses in Northeast India
Frontiers in Environmental Science
biodiversity hotspots
carbon storage
forest types
land use
species richness
title Quantifying Tree Diversity, Carbon Stocks, and Sequestration Potential for Diverse Land Uses in Northeast India
title_full Quantifying Tree Diversity, Carbon Stocks, and Sequestration Potential for Diverse Land Uses in Northeast India
title_fullStr Quantifying Tree Diversity, Carbon Stocks, and Sequestration Potential for Diverse Land Uses in Northeast India
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying Tree Diversity, Carbon Stocks, and Sequestration Potential for Diverse Land Uses in Northeast India
title_short Quantifying Tree Diversity, Carbon Stocks, and Sequestration Potential for Diverse Land Uses in Northeast India
title_sort quantifying tree diversity carbon stocks and sequestration potential for diverse land uses in northeast india
topic biodiversity hotspots
carbon storage
forest types
land use
species richness
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2021.724950/full
work_keys_str_mv AT uttamkumarsahoo quantifyingtreediversitycarbonstocksandsequestrationpotentialfordiverselandusesinnortheastindia
AT omprakashtripathi quantifyingtreediversitycarbonstocksandsequestrationpotentialfordiverselandusesinnortheastindia
AT arunjyotinath quantifyingtreediversitycarbonstocksandsequestrationpotentialfordiverselandusesinnortheastindia
AT sourabhdeb quantifyingtreediversitycarbonstocksandsequestrationpotentialfordiverselandusesinnortheastindia
AT dhrubajyotidas quantifyingtreediversitycarbonstocksandsequestrationpotentialfordiverselandusesinnortheastindia
AT ashagupta quantifyingtreediversitycarbonstocksandsequestrationpotentialfordiverselandusesinnortheastindia
AT nbijayalaxmidevi quantifyingtreediversitycarbonstocksandsequestrationpotentialfordiverselandusesinnortheastindia
AT shivashankarcharturvedi quantifyingtreediversitycarbonstocksandsequestrationpotentialfordiverselandusesinnortheastindia
AT soibamlanabirsingh quantifyingtreediversitycarbonstocksandsequestrationpotentialfordiverselandusesinnortheastindia
AT soibamlanabirsingh quantifyingtreediversitycarbonstocksandsequestrationpotentialfordiverselandusesinnortheastindia
AT amitkumar quantifyingtreediversitycarbonstocksandsequestrationpotentialfordiverselandusesinnortheastindia
AT brajeshkumartiwari quantifyingtreediversitycarbonstocksandsequestrationpotentialfordiverselandusesinnortheastindia