Quantifying Tree Diversity, Carbon Stocks, and Sequestration Potential for Diverse Land Uses in Northeast India
In the modern era, rapid anthropogenic activities in the vicinity of the Himalayas disturb the carbon sequestration potential resulting in climate change. For the first time, this study estimates the biomass and carbon storage potential of Northeast India’s diverse land uses through a biomass estima...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021-10-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Environmental Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2021.724950/full |
_version_ | 1818724135037042688 |
---|---|
author | Uttam Kumar Sahoo Om Prakash Tripathi Arun Jyoti Nath Sourabh Deb Dhruba Jyoti Das Asha Gupta N. Bijayalaxmi Devi Shiva Shankar Charturvedi Soibam Lanabir Singh Soibam Lanabir Singh Amit Kumar Brajesh Kumar Tiwari |
author_facet | Uttam Kumar Sahoo Om Prakash Tripathi Arun Jyoti Nath Sourabh Deb Dhruba Jyoti Das Asha Gupta N. Bijayalaxmi Devi Shiva Shankar Charturvedi Soibam Lanabir Singh Soibam Lanabir Singh Amit Kumar Brajesh Kumar Tiwari |
author_sort | Uttam Kumar Sahoo |
collection | DOAJ |
description | In the modern era, rapid anthropogenic activities in the vicinity of the Himalayas disturb the carbon sequestration potential resulting in climate change. For the first time, this study estimates the biomass and carbon storage potential of Northeast India’s diverse land uses through a biomass estimation model developed for this region. The mean tree density in tropical, subtropical, and temperate forests was 539, 554, and 638 trees ha−1, respectively. The mean vegetation carbon stock was the highest for temperate forests (122.09 Mg C ha−1), followed by subtropical plantations (115.45 Mg C ha−1), subtropical forests (106.01 Mg C ha−1), tropical forests (105.33 Mg C ha−1), tropical plantations (93.00 Mg C ha−1), and temperate plantations (50.10 Mg C ha−1). Among the forests, the mean soil organic carbon (SOC) stock up to 45 cm depth was the highest for tropical forests (72.54 Mg C ha−1), followed by temperate forests (63.4 Mg C ha−1) and subtropical forests (42.58 Mg C ha−1). A strong relationship between the tree basal area and biomass carbon storage was found for all land-use types. The land-use transformation from agriculture to agroforestry, and grassland to plantations increased both vegetation carbon (VC) and SOC stocks. The corresponding increase in VC and SOC was 40.80 and 43.34 Mg C ha−1, respectively, in the former, and 83.18 and 97.64 Mg C ha−1 in the latter. In general, the landscape-level estimates were drawn from site-level estimates in a given land-use type, and therefore, the corresponding values might be overestimated. Nevertheless, the results provide baseline information on carbon stock which may serve as a reference for devising appropriate land-use change policies in the region. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-17T21:21:36Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-49e07e2c07b444fea5e387131e1201a3 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2296-665X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-17T21:21:36Z |
publishDate | 2021-10-01 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | Article |
series | Frontiers in Environmental Science |
spelling | doaj.art-49e07e2c07b444fea5e387131e1201a32022-12-21T21:32:11ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Environmental Science2296-665X2021-10-01910.3389/fenvs.2021.724950724950Quantifying Tree Diversity, Carbon Stocks, and Sequestration Potential for Diverse Land Uses in Northeast IndiaUttam Kumar Sahoo0Om Prakash Tripathi1Arun Jyoti Nath2Sourabh Deb3Dhruba Jyoti Das4Asha Gupta5N. Bijayalaxmi Devi6Shiva Shankar Charturvedi7Soibam Lanabir Singh8Soibam Lanabir Singh9Amit Kumar10Brajesh Kumar Tiwari11Department of Forestry, Mizoram University, Aizawl, IndiaDepartment of Forestry, North Eastern Regional Institute of Science & Technology, Itanagar, IndiaDepartment of Ecology and Environment Science, Assam University, Silchar, IndiaDepartment of Forestry and Biodiversity, Tripura University, Agartala, IndiaRain Forest Research Institute, Jorhat, IndiaDepartment of Life Science, Manipur University, Imphal, IndiaDepartment of Botany, Sikkim University, Gangtok, IndiaDepartment of Environment Studies, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong, IndiaDepartment of Forestry, Mizoram University, Aizawl, IndiaDepartment of Forestry, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Bihar, India0School of Hydrology and Water Resources, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, ChinaDepartment of Environment Studies, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong, IndiaIn the modern era, rapid anthropogenic activities in the vicinity of the Himalayas disturb the carbon sequestration potential resulting in climate change. For the first time, this study estimates the biomass and carbon storage potential of Northeast India’s diverse land uses through a biomass estimation model developed for this region. The mean tree density in tropical, subtropical, and temperate forests was 539, 554, and 638 trees ha−1, respectively. The mean vegetation carbon stock was the highest for temperate forests (122.09 Mg C ha−1), followed by subtropical plantations (115.45 Mg C ha−1), subtropical forests (106.01 Mg C ha−1), tropical forests (105.33 Mg C ha−1), tropical plantations (93.00 Mg C ha−1), and temperate plantations (50.10 Mg C ha−1). Among the forests, the mean soil organic carbon (SOC) stock up to 45 cm depth was the highest for tropical forests (72.54 Mg C ha−1), followed by temperate forests (63.4 Mg C ha−1) and subtropical forests (42.58 Mg C ha−1). A strong relationship between the tree basal area and biomass carbon storage was found for all land-use types. The land-use transformation from agriculture to agroforestry, and grassland to plantations increased both vegetation carbon (VC) and SOC stocks. The corresponding increase in VC and SOC was 40.80 and 43.34 Mg C ha−1, respectively, in the former, and 83.18 and 97.64 Mg C ha−1 in the latter. In general, the landscape-level estimates were drawn from site-level estimates in a given land-use type, and therefore, the corresponding values might be overestimated. Nevertheless, the results provide baseline information on carbon stock which may serve as a reference for devising appropriate land-use change policies in the region.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2021.724950/fullbiodiversity hotspotscarbon storageforest typesland usespecies richness |
spellingShingle | Uttam Kumar Sahoo Om Prakash Tripathi Arun Jyoti Nath Sourabh Deb Dhruba Jyoti Das Asha Gupta N. Bijayalaxmi Devi Shiva Shankar Charturvedi Soibam Lanabir Singh Soibam Lanabir Singh Amit Kumar Brajesh Kumar Tiwari Quantifying Tree Diversity, Carbon Stocks, and Sequestration Potential for Diverse Land Uses in Northeast India Frontiers in Environmental Science biodiversity hotspots carbon storage forest types land use species richness |
title | Quantifying Tree Diversity, Carbon Stocks, and Sequestration Potential for Diverse Land Uses in Northeast India |
title_full | Quantifying Tree Diversity, Carbon Stocks, and Sequestration Potential for Diverse Land Uses in Northeast India |
title_fullStr | Quantifying Tree Diversity, Carbon Stocks, and Sequestration Potential for Diverse Land Uses in Northeast India |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantifying Tree Diversity, Carbon Stocks, and Sequestration Potential for Diverse Land Uses in Northeast India |
title_short | Quantifying Tree Diversity, Carbon Stocks, and Sequestration Potential for Diverse Land Uses in Northeast India |
title_sort | quantifying tree diversity carbon stocks and sequestration potential for diverse land uses in northeast india |
topic | biodiversity hotspots carbon storage forest types land use species richness |
url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2021.724950/full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT uttamkumarsahoo quantifyingtreediversitycarbonstocksandsequestrationpotentialfordiverselandusesinnortheastindia AT omprakashtripathi quantifyingtreediversitycarbonstocksandsequestrationpotentialfordiverselandusesinnortheastindia AT arunjyotinath quantifyingtreediversitycarbonstocksandsequestrationpotentialfordiverselandusesinnortheastindia AT sourabhdeb quantifyingtreediversitycarbonstocksandsequestrationpotentialfordiverselandusesinnortheastindia AT dhrubajyotidas quantifyingtreediversitycarbonstocksandsequestrationpotentialfordiverselandusesinnortheastindia AT ashagupta quantifyingtreediversitycarbonstocksandsequestrationpotentialfordiverselandusesinnortheastindia AT nbijayalaxmidevi quantifyingtreediversitycarbonstocksandsequestrationpotentialfordiverselandusesinnortheastindia AT shivashankarcharturvedi quantifyingtreediversitycarbonstocksandsequestrationpotentialfordiverselandusesinnortheastindia AT soibamlanabirsingh quantifyingtreediversitycarbonstocksandsequestrationpotentialfordiverselandusesinnortheastindia AT soibamlanabirsingh quantifyingtreediversitycarbonstocksandsequestrationpotentialfordiverselandusesinnortheastindia AT amitkumar quantifyingtreediversitycarbonstocksandsequestrationpotentialfordiverselandusesinnortheastindia AT brajeshkumartiwari quantifyingtreediversitycarbonstocksandsequestrationpotentialfordiverselandusesinnortheastindia |