Differing associations between sex determination and sex‐linked inversions in two ecotypes of Littorina saxatilis

Abstract Sexual antagonism is a common hypothesis for driving the evolution of sex chromosomes, whereby recombination suppression is favored between sexually antagonistic loci and the sex‐determining locus to maintain beneficial combinations of alleles. This results in the formation of a sex‐determi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Katherine E. Hearn, Eva L. Koch, Sean Stankowski, Roger K. Butlin, Rui Faria, Kerstin Johannesson, Anja M. Westram
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 2022-10-01
Series:Evolution Letters
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/evl3.295
_version_ 1827837659730411520
author Katherine E. Hearn
Eva L. Koch
Sean Stankowski
Roger K. Butlin
Rui Faria
Kerstin Johannesson
Anja M. Westram
author_facet Katherine E. Hearn
Eva L. Koch
Sean Stankowski
Roger K. Butlin
Rui Faria
Kerstin Johannesson
Anja M. Westram
author_sort Katherine E. Hearn
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Sexual antagonism is a common hypothesis for driving the evolution of sex chromosomes, whereby recombination suppression is favored between sexually antagonistic loci and the sex‐determining locus to maintain beneficial combinations of alleles. This results in the formation of a sex‐determining region. Chromosomal inversions may contribute to recombination suppression but their precise role in sex chromosome evolution remains unclear. Because local adaptation is frequently facilitated through the suppression of recombination between adaptive loci by chromosomal inversions, there is potential for inversions that cover sex‐determining regions to be involved in local adaptation as well, particularly if habitat variation creates environment‐dependent sexual antagonism. With these processes in mind, we investigated sex determination in a well‐studied example of local adaptation within a species: the intertidal snail, Littorina saxatilis. Using SNP data from a Swedish hybrid zone, we find novel evidence for a female‐heterogametic sex determination system that is restricted to one ecotype. Our results suggest that four putative chromosomal inversions, two previously described and two newly discovered, span the putative sex chromosome pair. We determine their differing associations with sex, which suggest distinct strata of differing ages. The same inversions are found in the second ecotype but do not show any sex association. The striking disparity in inversion‐sex associations between ecotypes that are connected by gene flow across a habitat transition that is just a few meters wide indicates a difference in selective regime that has produced a distinct barrier to the spread of the newly discovered sex‐determining region between ecotypes. Such sex chromosome‐environment interactions have not previously been uncovered in L. saxatilis and are known in few other organisms. A combination of both sex‐specific selection and divergent natural selection is required to explain these highly unusual patterns.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T06:49:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-49e5d130ccd946dd982c2df6f169e137
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2056-3744
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T06:49:07Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format Article
series Evolution Letters
spelling doaj.art-49e5d130ccd946dd982c2df6f169e1372023-09-03T00:22:37ZengOxford University PressEvolution Letters2056-37442022-10-016535837410.1002/evl3.295Differing associations between sex determination and sex‐linked inversions in two ecotypes of Littorina saxatilisKatherine E. Hearn0Eva L. Koch1Sean Stankowski2Roger K. Butlin3Rui Faria4Kerstin Johannesson5Anja M. Westram6Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, School of Biosciences University of Sheffield Sheffield S10 2TN United KingdomEcology and Evolutionary Biology, School of Biosciences University of Sheffield Sheffield S10 2TN United KingdomEcology and Evolutionary Biology, School of Biosciences University of Sheffield Sheffield S10 2TN United KingdomEcology and Evolutionary Biology, School of Biosciences University of Sheffield Sheffield S10 2TN United KingdomCIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO Laboratório Associado Campus de Vairão, Universidade do Porto Vairão 4485‐661 PortugalDepartment of Marine Sciences University of Gothenburg Strömstad SE‐45296 SwedenISTA (Institute of Science and Technology Austria) Klosterneuburg 3400 AustriaAbstract Sexual antagonism is a common hypothesis for driving the evolution of sex chromosomes, whereby recombination suppression is favored between sexually antagonistic loci and the sex‐determining locus to maintain beneficial combinations of alleles. This results in the formation of a sex‐determining region. Chromosomal inversions may contribute to recombination suppression but their precise role in sex chromosome evolution remains unclear. Because local adaptation is frequently facilitated through the suppression of recombination between adaptive loci by chromosomal inversions, there is potential for inversions that cover sex‐determining regions to be involved in local adaptation as well, particularly if habitat variation creates environment‐dependent sexual antagonism. With these processes in mind, we investigated sex determination in a well‐studied example of local adaptation within a species: the intertidal snail, Littorina saxatilis. Using SNP data from a Swedish hybrid zone, we find novel evidence for a female‐heterogametic sex determination system that is restricted to one ecotype. Our results suggest that four putative chromosomal inversions, two previously described and two newly discovered, span the putative sex chromosome pair. We determine their differing associations with sex, which suggest distinct strata of differing ages. The same inversions are found in the second ecotype but do not show any sex association. The striking disparity in inversion‐sex associations between ecotypes that are connected by gene flow across a habitat transition that is just a few meters wide indicates a difference in selective regime that has produced a distinct barrier to the spread of the newly discovered sex‐determining region between ecotypes. Such sex chromosome‐environment interactions have not previously been uncovered in L. saxatilis and are known in few other organisms. A combination of both sex‐specific selection and divergent natural selection is required to explain these highly unusual patterns.https://doi.org/10.1002/evl3.295Hybrid zonelocal adaptationrecombination suppressionsex chromosomessexual antagonism
spellingShingle Katherine E. Hearn
Eva L. Koch
Sean Stankowski
Roger K. Butlin
Rui Faria
Kerstin Johannesson
Anja M. Westram
Differing associations between sex determination and sex‐linked inversions in two ecotypes of Littorina saxatilis
Evolution Letters
Hybrid zone
local adaptation
recombination suppression
sex chromosomes
sexual antagonism
title Differing associations between sex determination and sex‐linked inversions in two ecotypes of Littorina saxatilis
title_full Differing associations between sex determination and sex‐linked inversions in two ecotypes of Littorina saxatilis
title_fullStr Differing associations between sex determination and sex‐linked inversions in two ecotypes of Littorina saxatilis
title_full_unstemmed Differing associations between sex determination and sex‐linked inversions in two ecotypes of Littorina saxatilis
title_short Differing associations between sex determination and sex‐linked inversions in two ecotypes of Littorina saxatilis
title_sort differing associations between sex determination and sex linked inversions in two ecotypes of littorina saxatilis
topic Hybrid zone
local adaptation
recombination suppression
sex chromosomes
sexual antagonism
url https://doi.org/10.1002/evl3.295
work_keys_str_mv AT katherineehearn differingassociationsbetweensexdeterminationandsexlinkedinversionsintwoecotypesoflittorinasaxatilis
AT evalkoch differingassociationsbetweensexdeterminationandsexlinkedinversionsintwoecotypesoflittorinasaxatilis
AT seanstankowski differingassociationsbetweensexdeterminationandsexlinkedinversionsintwoecotypesoflittorinasaxatilis
AT rogerkbutlin differingassociationsbetweensexdeterminationandsexlinkedinversionsintwoecotypesoflittorinasaxatilis
AT ruifaria differingassociationsbetweensexdeterminationandsexlinkedinversionsintwoecotypesoflittorinasaxatilis
AT kerstinjohannesson differingassociationsbetweensexdeterminationandsexlinkedinversionsintwoecotypesoflittorinasaxatilis
AT anjamwestram differingassociationsbetweensexdeterminationandsexlinkedinversionsintwoecotypesoflittorinasaxatilis