Positivism and Normativism in the Theory of International Relations

This text is a polemical contribution to the debate on positivism and postpositivism in the study of international relations. It focuses on four aspects rendering Loužek's defence of positivism rather flimsy: first, the untenability of the positivism-normativism dichotomy. Second, a more detai...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Petr Kratochvíl
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institute of International Relations Prague 2006-03-01
Series:Czech Journal of International Relations
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojs3.iir.cz/index.php/cjir/article/view/622
_version_ 1811168277434466304
author Petr Kratochvíl
author_facet Petr Kratochvíl
author_sort Petr Kratochvíl
collection DOAJ
description This text is a polemical contribution to the debate on positivism and postpositivism in the study of international relations. It focuses on four aspects rendering Loužek's defence of positivism rather flimsy: first, the untenability of the positivism-normativism dichotomy. Second, a more detailed analysis of theories incorrectly grouped with normativism. Third is an analogous analysis of positivistic theories, and particularly their claims to an epistemologically neutral access to reality, and fourth, we discuss Loužek's ambivalent attitude to modernity, particularly to the notion of progress.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T16:24:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-49e918267a3e429d9a95435e8e3d0d5a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0323-1844
2570-9429
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T16:24:29Z
publishDate 2006-03-01
publisher Institute of International Relations Prague
record_format Article
series Czech Journal of International Relations
spelling doaj.art-49e918267a3e429d9a95435e8e3d0d5a2023-02-09T08:25:14ZengInstitute of International Relations PragueCzech Journal of International Relations0323-18442570-94292006-03-01411sPositivism and Normativism in the Theory of International RelationsPetr Kratochvíl This text is a polemical contribution to the debate on positivism and postpositivism in the study of international relations. It focuses on four aspects rendering Loužek's defence of positivism rather flimsy: first, the untenability of the positivism-normativism dichotomy. Second, a more detailed analysis of theories incorrectly grouped with normativism. Third is an analogous analysis of positivistic theories, and particularly their claims to an epistemologically neutral access to reality, and fourth, we discuss Loužek's ambivalent attitude to modernity, particularly to the notion of progress. https://ojs3.iir.cz/index.php/cjir/article/view/622Theory of international relationsphilosophy of social sciencepositivismpostpositivism
spellingShingle Petr Kratochvíl
Positivism and Normativism in the Theory of International Relations
Czech Journal of International Relations
Theory of international relations
philosophy of social science
positivism
postpositivism
title Positivism and Normativism in the Theory of International Relations
title_full Positivism and Normativism in the Theory of International Relations
title_fullStr Positivism and Normativism in the Theory of International Relations
title_full_unstemmed Positivism and Normativism in the Theory of International Relations
title_short Positivism and Normativism in the Theory of International Relations
title_sort positivism and normativism in the theory of international relations
topic Theory of international relations
philosophy of social science
positivism
postpositivism
url https://ojs3.iir.cz/index.php/cjir/article/view/622
work_keys_str_mv AT petrkratochvil positivismandnormativisminthetheoryofinternationalrelations