Revisiting adiabatic fraction estimations in cumulus clouds: high-resolution simulations with a passive tracer

<p>The process of mixing in warm convective clouds and its effects on microphysics are crucial for an accurate description of cloud fields, weather, and climate. Still, they remain open questions in the field of cloud physics. Adiabatic regions in the cloud could be considered non-mixed areas...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: E. Eytan, I. Koren, O. Altaratz, M. Pinsky, A. Khain
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2021-11-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/16203/2021/acp-21-16203-2021.pdf
_version_ 1818568283689844736
author E. Eytan
I. Koren
O. Altaratz
M. Pinsky
A. Khain
author_facet E. Eytan
I. Koren
O. Altaratz
M. Pinsky
A. Khain
author_sort E. Eytan
collection DOAJ
description <p>The process of mixing in warm convective clouds and its effects on microphysics are crucial for an accurate description of cloud fields, weather, and climate. Still, they remain open questions in the field of cloud physics. Adiabatic regions in the cloud could be considered non-mixed areas and therefore serve as an important reference to mixing. For this reason, the adiabatic fraction (AF) is an important parameter that estimates the mixing level in the cloud in a simple way. Here, we test different methods of AF calculations using high-resolution (10 m) simulations of isolated warm cumulus clouds. The calculated AFs are compared with a normalized concentration of a passive tracer, which is a measure of dilution by mixing. This comparison enables the examination of how well the AF parameter can determine mixing effects and the estimation of the accuracy of different approaches used to calculate it. Comparison of three different methods to derive AF, with the passive tracer, shows that one method is much more robust than the others. Moreover, this method's equation structure also allows for the isolation of different assumptions that are often practiced when calculating AF such as vertical profiles, cloud-base height, and the linearity of AF with height. The use of a detailed spectral bin microphysics scheme allows an accurate description of the supersaturation field and demonstrates that the accuracy of the saturation adjustment assumption depends on aerosol concentration, leading to an underestimation of AF in pristine environments.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-14T06:33:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-49eb6ec7e4e34488b8fd107d38529d6f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1680-7316
1680-7324
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T06:33:49Z
publishDate 2021-11-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
spelling doaj.art-49eb6ec7e4e34488b8fd107d38529d6f2022-12-21T23:13:26ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242021-11-0121162031621710.5194/acp-21-16203-2021Revisiting adiabatic fraction estimations in cumulus clouds: high-resolution simulations with a passive tracerE. Eytan0I. Koren1O. Altaratz2M. Pinsky3A. Khain4Department of Earth and Planetary Science, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, IsraelDepartment of Earth and Planetary Science, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, IsraelDepartment of Earth and Planetary Science, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, IsraelInstitute of Earth Science, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, IsraelInstitute of Earth Science, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel<p>The process of mixing in warm convective clouds and its effects on microphysics are crucial for an accurate description of cloud fields, weather, and climate. Still, they remain open questions in the field of cloud physics. Adiabatic regions in the cloud could be considered non-mixed areas and therefore serve as an important reference to mixing. For this reason, the adiabatic fraction (AF) is an important parameter that estimates the mixing level in the cloud in a simple way. Here, we test different methods of AF calculations using high-resolution (10 m) simulations of isolated warm cumulus clouds. The calculated AFs are compared with a normalized concentration of a passive tracer, which is a measure of dilution by mixing. This comparison enables the examination of how well the AF parameter can determine mixing effects and the estimation of the accuracy of different approaches used to calculate it. Comparison of three different methods to derive AF, with the passive tracer, shows that one method is much more robust than the others. Moreover, this method's equation structure also allows for the isolation of different assumptions that are often practiced when calculating AF such as vertical profiles, cloud-base height, and the linearity of AF with height. The use of a detailed spectral bin microphysics scheme allows an accurate description of the supersaturation field and demonstrates that the accuracy of the saturation adjustment assumption depends on aerosol concentration, leading to an underestimation of AF in pristine environments.</p>https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/16203/2021/acp-21-16203-2021.pdf
spellingShingle E. Eytan
I. Koren
O. Altaratz
M. Pinsky
A. Khain
Revisiting adiabatic fraction estimations in cumulus clouds: high-resolution simulations with a passive tracer
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
title Revisiting adiabatic fraction estimations in cumulus clouds: high-resolution simulations with a passive tracer
title_full Revisiting adiabatic fraction estimations in cumulus clouds: high-resolution simulations with a passive tracer
title_fullStr Revisiting adiabatic fraction estimations in cumulus clouds: high-resolution simulations with a passive tracer
title_full_unstemmed Revisiting adiabatic fraction estimations in cumulus clouds: high-resolution simulations with a passive tracer
title_short Revisiting adiabatic fraction estimations in cumulus clouds: high-resolution simulations with a passive tracer
title_sort revisiting adiabatic fraction estimations in cumulus clouds high resolution simulations with a passive tracer
url https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/16203/2021/acp-21-16203-2021.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT eeytan revisitingadiabaticfractionestimationsincumuluscloudshighresolutionsimulationswithapassivetracer
AT ikoren revisitingadiabaticfractionestimationsincumuluscloudshighresolutionsimulationswithapassivetracer
AT oaltaratz revisitingadiabaticfractionestimationsincumuluscloudshighresolutionsimulationswithapassivetracer
AT mpinsky revisitingadiabaticfractionestimationsincumuluscloudshighresolutionsimulationswithapassivetracer
AT akhain revisitingadiabaticfractionestimationsincumuluscloudshighresolutionsimulationswithapassivetracer