Challenges and difficulties in diagnosis of normal-tension glaucoma

Aim The aim of this study is to clinically investigate the challenges and pitfalls of normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) diagnostic methods by ophthalmic clinical and investigative examinations. Setting This study was conducted at Al-Agouza Police Authority Hospital and Badr University Hospital. Method...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Islam M Metwally, Mostafa M Bahgat, Ahmed F El-Shahed
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2023-01-01
Series:Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jeos.eg.net/article.asp?issn=2090-0686;year=2023;volume=116;issue=3;spage=138;epage=144;aulast=Metwally
_version_ 1797645703039680512
author Islam M Metwally
Mostafa M Bahgat
Ahmed F El-Shahed
author_facet Islam M Metwally
Mostafa M Bahgat
Ahmed F El-Shahed
author_sort Islam M Metwally
collection DOAJ
description Aim The aim of this study is to clinically investigate the challenges and pitfalls of normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) diagnostic methods by ophthalmic clinical and investigative examinations. Setting This study was conducted at Al-Agouza Police Authority Hospital and Badr University Hospital. Methods A cross-sectional comparative study between the diagnosis of normal nonglaucoma patients and NTG. It included 40 normal nonglaucoma patients’ eyes as controls and 40 NTG patients’ eyes who met inclusion criteria. They were assessed by a complete ophthalmic exam., visual field (VF), and optical coherence tomography (OCT) variables between January 2022 and September 2022. Results The median age of the control group was 38 years old, while that of glaucomatous patients was 41 years old. The mean intraocular pressure (IOP) for the normal group was 15.53 mmHg (±1.935), while that for the glaucomatous group was 16.85 mmHg (±1.703). The intraocular pressure was considerably higher in the NTG group compared with the control (P = 0.0017). The mean deviation (MD) in dB of VF loss was considerably higher in the NTG group compared with the control (P = 0.0001). Also, the mean standard deviation (MSD) was considerably varied between the two groups (P < 0.0001). The average Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer (RNFL) in the NTG group, with a mean of 72.3 սm (±10.239) was significantly lower than in the control group with a mean of 102.025 սm (±7.454), P = 0.0001. Optic Disc Parameters: The Cup Area (mm2) was significantly wider in the NTG group with a mean of 1.62 (±0.476) than in the control with a mean of 1.297 (±0.44), P = 0.0024. Also, the Rim Area was significantly smaller in the NTG group with a mean of 0.614 (±0.342) than in the control with a mean of 1.135 (±0.319), P = 0.0024. The Cup/disc ratio was significantly larger in the NTG group than in the control group (P < 0.0001). The average Ganglion cell complex (GCC) was considerably thinner in the NTG patients in comparison to the controls (P = 0.0001). Conclusion The effects of NTG on VF and optic nerve seems to be more intensive. More focal notches and disc hemorrhage were noted in NTG. In the NTG group, the Cup Area was potentially wider, the rim area was significantly thinner, and the Cup/disc ratio was significantly larger.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T14:50:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-49efe0230d65412d818866d532457e01
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2090-0686
2314-6648
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T14:50:39Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society
spelling doaj.art-49efe0230d65412d818866d532457e012023-10-30T09:35:56ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society2090-06862314-66482023-01-01116313814410.4103/ejos.ejos_30_23Challenges and difficulties in diagnosis of normal-tension glaucomaIslam M MetwallyMostafa M BahgatAhmed F El-ShahedAim The aim of this study is to clinically investigate the challenges and pitfalls of normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) diagnostic methods by ophthalmic clinical and investigative examinations. Setting This study was conducted at Al-Agouza Police Authority Hospital and Badr University Hospital. Methods A cross-sectional comparative study between the diagnosis of normal nonglaucoma patients and NTG. It included 40 normal nonglaucoma patients’ eyes as controls and 40 NTG patients’ eyes who met inclusion criteria. They were assessed by a complete ophthalmic exam., visual field (VF), and optical coherence tomography (OCT) variables between January 2022 and September 2022. Results The median age of the control group was 38 years old, while that of glaucomatous patients was 41 years old. The mean intraocular pressure (IOP) for the normal group was 15.53 mmHg (±1.935), while that for the glaucomatous group was 16.85 mmHg (±1.703). The intraocular pressure was considerably higher in the NTG group compared with the control (P = 0.0017). The mean deviation (MD) in dB of VF loss was considerably higher in the NTG group compared with the control (P = 0.0001). Also, the mean standard deviation (MSD) was considerably varied between the two groups (P < 0.0001). The average Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer (RNFL) in the NTG group, with a mean of 72.3 սm (±10.239) was significantly lower than in the control group with a mean of 102.025 սm (±7.454), P = 0.0001. Optic Disc Parameters: The Cup Area (mm2) was significantly wider in the NTG group with a mean of 1.62 (±0.476) than in the control with a mean of 1.297 (±0.44), P = 0.0024. Also, the Rim Area was significantly smaller in the NTG group with a mean of 0.614 (±0.342) than in the control with a mean of 1.135 (±0.319), P = 0.0024. The Cup/disc ratio was significantly larger in the NTG group than in the control group (P < 0.0001). The average Ganglion cell complex (GCC) was considerably thinner in the NTG patients in comparison to the controls (P = 0.0001). Conclusion The effects of NTG on VF and optic nerve seems to be more intensive. More focal notches and disc hemorrhage were noted in NTG. In the NTG group, the Cup Area was potentially wider, the rim area was significantly thinner, and the Cup/disc ratio was significantly larger.http://www.jeos.eg.net/article.asp?issn=2090-0686;year=2023;volume=116;issue=3;spage=138;epage=144;aulast=Metwallyglaucomaopen angle glaucomanormal-tension glaucoma
spellingShingle Islam M Metwally
Mostafa M Bahgat
Ahmed F El-Shahed
Challenges and difficulties in diagnosis of normal-tension glaucoma
Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society
glaucoma
open angle glaucoma
normal-tension glaucoma
title Challenges and difficulties in diagnosis of normal-tension glaucoma
title_full Challenges and difficulties in diagnosis of normal-tension glaucoma
title_fullStr Challenges and difficulties in diagnosis of normal-tension glaucoma
title_full_unstemmed Challenges and difficulties in diagnosis of normal-tension glaucoma
title_short Challenges and difficulties in diagnosis of normal-tension glaucoma
title_sort challenges and difficulties in diagnosis of normal tension glaucoma
topic glaucoma
open angle glaucoma
normal-tension glaucoma
url http://www.jeos.eg.net/article.asp?issn=2090-0686;year=2023;volume=116;issue=3;spage=138;epage=144;aulast=Metwally
work_keys_str_mv AT islammmetwally challengesanddifficultiesindiagnosisofnormaltensionglaucoma
AT mostafambahgat challengesanddifficultiesindiagnosisofnormaltensionglaucoma
AT ahmedfelshahed challengesanddifficultiesindiagnosisofnormaltensionglaucoma