Spatial Concentrations of Wildlife Attacks on Humans in Chitwan National Park, Nepal

The study was conducted within and adjacent to Chitwan National Park in Nepal (CNP), where several wildlife species are involved in conflicts with humans. We assessed the spatial relationships between the number of victims/km<sup>2</sup> (=victim density or VD) of attack by wildlife (ele...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aleš Ruda, Jaromír Kolejka, Thakur Silwal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-01-01
Series:Animals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/10/1/153
Description
Summary:The study was conducted within and adjacent to Chitwan National Park in Nepal (CNP), where several wildlife species are involved in conflicts with humans. We assessed the spatial relationships between the number of victims/km<sup>2</sup> (=victim density or VD) of attack by wildlife (elephant, rhino, wild boar, sloth bear, leopard or tiger) versus landscape features, including both natural habitat type and land use by humans (e.g., nursery, orchard or cultivated). We identified four levels of VD, ranging from &lt;1 V (victim)/4 km<sup>2</sup> to &gt;1 V/2 km<sup>2</sup> for each land use zone, then tested for correlations at one or more of those VD between each pair of wildlife species across different land use types. Our results high correlation for sloth bear and leopard (<i>r</i> &#8776; 0.8), for all species except elephant and wild boar at VD &gt; 1 V/4 km<sup>2</sup> (<i>r</i> &gt; 0.9) and for leopard vs. rhinoceros (<i>r</i> = 0.99) across land use types at 1 V/4 km<sup>2</sup>) indicate some risk-reduction measures. One of them would be division of each buffer zone into three concentric rings, for instance ranging from high-risk adjacent areas to areas of high use by humans, to low-risk where human use is low. This revision would facilitate giving local people more voice in implementing conservation measures and reducing risks.
ISSN:2076-2615