An Exploratory Analysis of Expert and Nonexpert-Based Land-Scape Aesthetics Evaluations: A Case Study from Wales

The debate over the conceptual constructs of landscape aesthetics, specifically whether landscape quality is inherently related to landscape physical characteristics or is subjectively “in the eye of the beholder,” has continued for years. Solutions accommodating both the biophysical and perceptual...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yi-Min Chang Chien, Steve Carver, Alexis Comber
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-02-01
Series:Land
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/2/192
_version_ 1797396643956391936
author Yi-Min Chang Chien
Steve Carver
Alexis Comber
author_facet Yi-Min Chang Chien
Steve Carver
Alexis Comber
author_sort Yi-Min Chang Chien
collection DOAJ
description The debate over the conceptual constructs of landscape aesthetics, specifically whether landscape quality is inherently related to landscape physical characteristics or is subjectively “in the eye of the beholder,” has continued for years. Solutions accommodating both the biophysical and perceptual aspects of landscapes are thus desirable for landscape planners and policymakers. In response to policy shifts that emphasise both expert and public landscape perspectives, this study investigates the relationships between formal and informal landscape evaluations. It analyses crowdsourced data describing landscape aesthetic quality (Scenic-Or-Not) and authoritative landscape quality assessments (the Landscape Assessment Decision Making Process (LANDMAP) of Wales). Some agreement was found regarding landforms most likely to be perceived as scenic or unattractive by experts and non-experts, which aligns with previous landscape perception studies. However, contested landscape typologies are identified formal and informal landscape aesthetic evaluations are compared. Several limitations and implications for current formal landscape assessment paradigms (GIS based and vertical) are discussed and several approaches for capturing on-the-ground perceptions are suggested including recent extensions to GIS derived viewsheds (e.g., vertical voxel viewsheds).
first_indexed 2024-03-09T00:53:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4a42f3eb050643b9b465ec89de07ad96
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-445X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T00:53:25Z
publishDate 2021-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Land
spelling doaj.art-4a42f3eb050643b9b465ec89de07ad962023-12-11T17:01:00ZengMDPI AGLand2073-445X2021-02-0110219210.3390/land10020192An Exploratory Analysis of Expert and Nonexpert-Based Land-Scape Aesthetics Evaluations: A Case Study from WalesYi-Min Chang Chien0Steve Carver1Alexis Comber2School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UKSchool of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UKSchool of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UKThe debate over the conceptual constructs of landscape aesthetics, specifically whether landscape quality is inherently related to landscape physical characteristics or is subjectively “in the eye of the beholder,” has continued for years. Solutions accommodating both the biophysical and perceptual aspects of landscapes are thus desirable for landscape planners and policymakers. In response to policy shifts that emphasise both expert and public landscape perspectives, this study investigates the relationships between formal and informal landscape evaluations. It analyses crowdsourced data describing landscape aesthetic quality (Scenic-Or-Not) and authoritative landscape quality assessments (the Landscape Assessment Decision Making Process (LANDMAP) of Wales). Some agreement was found regarding landforms most likely to be perceived as scenic or unattractive by experts and non-experts, which aligns with previous landscape perception studies. However, contested landscape typologies are identified formal and informal landscape aesthetic evaluations are compared. Several limitations and implications for current formal landscape assessment paradigms (GIS based and vertical) are discussed and several approaches for capturing on-the-ground perceptions are suggested including recent extensions to GIS derived viewsheds (e.g., vertical voxel viewsheds).https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/2/192landscape character assessmentscrowdsourcingScenic-Or-Not
spellingShingle Yi-Min Chang Chien
Steve Carver
Alexis Comber
An Exploratory Analysis of Expert and Nonexpert-Based Land-Scape Aesthetics Evaluations: A Case Study from Wales
Land
landscape character assessments
crowdsourcing
Scenic-Or-Not
title An Exploratory Analysis of Expert and Nonexpert-Based Land-Scape Aesthetics Evaluations: A Case Study from Wales
title_full An Exploratory Analysis of Expert and Nonexpert-Based Land-Scape Aesthetics Evaluations: A Case Study from Wales
title_fullStr An Exploratory Analysis of Expert and Nonexpert-Based Land-Scape Aesthetics Evaluations: A Case Study from Wales
title_full_unstemmed An Exploratory Analysis of Expert and Nonexpert-Based Land-Scape Aesthetics Evaluations: A Case Study from Wales
title_short An Exploratory Analysis of Expert and Nonexpert-Based Land-Scape Aesthetics Evaluations: A Case Study from Wales
title_sort exploratory analysis of expert and nonexpert based land scape aesthetics evaluations a case study from wales
topic landscape character assessments
crowdsourcing
Scenic-Or-Not
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/2/192
work_keys_str_mv AT yiminchangchien anexploratoryanalysisofexpertandnonexpertbasedlandscapeaestheticsevaluationsacasestudyfromwales
AT stevecarver anexploratoryanalysisofexpertandnonexpertbasedlandscapeaestheticsevaluationsacasestudyfromwales
AT alexiscomber anexploratoryanalysisofexpertandnonexpertbasedlandscapeaestheticsevaluationsacasestudyfromwales
AT yiminchangchien exploratoryanalysisofexpertandnonexpertbasedlandscapeaestheticsevaluationsacasestudyfromwales
AT stevecarver exploratoryanalysisofexpertandnonexpertbasedlandscapeaestheticsevaluationsacasestudyfromwales
AT alexiscomber exploratoryanalysisofexpertandnonexpertbasedlandscapeaestheticsevaluationsacasestudyfromwales