Revision of late periprosthetic infections of total hip endoprostheses: pros and cons of different concepts
<p>Many concepts have been devised for the treatment of late periprosthetic infections of total hip prostheses. A two-stage revision with a temporary antibiotic-impregnated cement spacer and a cemented prosthesis appears to be the most preferred procedure although, in recent times, there seems...
Main Author: | Bernd Fink |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Ivyspring International Publisher
2009-01-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Medical Sciences |
Online Access: | http://www.medsci.org/v06p0287.htm |
Similar Items
-
Clinical outcome of massive endoprostheses used for managing periprosthetic joint infections of the hip and knee
by: Alvand, A, et al.
Published: (2017) -
Oral Health Screening for Risk Reduction for Early Periprosthetic Joint Infections of Hip and Knee Endoprostheses—Results of a Prospective Cohort Study
by: Fabian Fenske, et al.
Published: (2023-07-01) -
Structural differences between hip endoprostheses, and implications on a hip kinetics
by: Mirza Biščević, et al.
Published: (2005-11-01) -
Hematological markers of periprosthetic joint infection after revision total hip arthroplasty
by: Elena L. Matveeva, et al.
Published: (2023-10-01) -
Landmarks of evolution of hip joint endoprosthesing
by: Oleynyk A.Ye.
Published: (2015-06-01)