Intimate Partner Violence: Innovations in Theory to Inform Clinical Practice, Policy, and Research

Intimate partner violence (IPV) and intergenerational transmission of IPV in families are destructive social issues in need of considerable attention. Knowledge of the multi-level, complex causes, and consequences of IPV in the United States has increased significantly over the last two decades. Giv...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: David Axlyn McLeod, Kirsten Havig, Anthony Natale, Angela Pharris
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-05-01
Series:Social Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/9/5/71
_version_ 1797568600399151104
author David Axlyn McLeod
Kirsten Havig
Anthony Natale
Angela Pharris
author_facet David Axlyn McLeod
Kirsten Havig
Anthony Natale
Angela Pharris
author_sort David Axlyn McLeod
collection DOAJ
description Intimate partner violence (IPV) and intergenerational transmission of IPV in families are destructive social issues in need of considerable attention. Knowledge of the multi-level, complex causes, and consequences of IPV in the United States has increased significantly over the last two decades. Given these gains in learning, the authors’ aim here is to highlight recent critical and emerging theoretical perspectives on IPV. Frameworks included for application are intersectionality theory, historical trauma and decolonization, human rights, constructivist self-development theory, the posttraumatic growth paradigm, and adverse childhood experiences. This discussion will help to illuminate the dynamics of IPV that are actionable by practitioners using frameworks that promote cultural sensitivity, inclusion, and strengths-based practice with diverse populations. The authors discuss the scope of IPV while focusing on critical vulnerable people and exploring issues of relative privilege and oppression. Next, the authors review the historical body of theory informing understandings of IPV, and emerging theoretical frameworks on IPV. We offer conclusions throughout as they relate to the application of highlighted theories to IPV.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T19:59:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4a473556e79a4d02a929cf62522c017b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-0760
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T19:59:14Z
publishDate 2020-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Social Sciences
spelling doaj.art-4a473556e79a4d02a929cf62522c017b2023-11-19T23:41:58ZengMDPI AGSocial Sciences2076-07602020-05-01957110.3390/socsci9050071Intimate Partner Violence: Innovations in Theory to Inform Clinical Practice, Policy, and ResearchDavid Axlyn McLeod0Kirsten Havig1Anthony Natale2Angela Pharris3Anne and Henry Zarrow School of Social Work, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USACollege of Health Sciences, Division of Social Work, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, USAAnne and Henry Zarrow School of Social Work, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USAAnne and Henry Zarrow School of Social Work, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USAIntimate partner violence (IPV) and intergenerational transmission of IPV in families are destructive social issues in need of considerable attention. Knowledge of the multi-level, complex causes, and consequences of IPV in the United States has increased significantly over the last two decades. Given these gains in learning, the authors’ aim here is to highlight recent critical and emerging theoretical perspectives on IPV. Frameworks included for application are intersectionality theory, historical trauma and decolonization, human rights, constructivist self-development theory, the posttraumatic growth paradigm, and adverse childhood experiences. This discussion will help to illuminate the dynamics of IPV that are actionable by practitioners using frameworks that promote cultural sensitivity, inclusion, and strengths-based practice with diverse populations. The authors discuss the scope of IPV while focusing on critical vulnerable people and exploring issues of relative privilege and oppression. Next, the authors review the historical body of theory informing understandings of IPV, and emerging theoretical frameworks on IPV. We offer conclusions throughout as they relate to the application of highlighted theories to IPV.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/9/5/71intimate partner violencedomestic violencetheorytraumaintersectionalityhuman rights
spellingShingle David Axlyn McLeod
Kirsten Havig
Anthony Natale
Angela Pharris
Intimate Partner Violence: Innovations in Theory to Inform Clinical Practice, Policy, and Research
Social Sciences
intimate partner violence
domestic violence
theory
trauma
intersectionality
human rights
title Intimate Partner Violence: Innovations in Theory to Inform Clinical Practice, Policy, and Research
title_full Intimate Partner Violence: Innovations in Theory to Inform Clinical Practice, Policy, and Research
title_fullStr Intimate Partner Violence: Innovations in Theory to Inform Clinical Practice, Policy, and Research
title_full_unstemmed Intimate Partner Violence: Innovations in Theory to Inform Clinical Practice, Policy, and Research
title_short Intimate Partner Violence: Innovations in Theory to Inform Clinical Practice, Policy, and Research
title_sort intimate partner violence innovations in theory to inform clinical practice policy and research
topic intimate partner violence
domestic violence
theory
trauma
intersectionality
human rights
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/9/5/71
work_keys_str_mv AT davidaxlynmcleod intimatepartnerviolenceinnovationsintheorytoinformclinicalpracticepolicyandresearch
AT kirstenhavig intimatepartnerviolenceinnovationsintheorytoinformclinicalpracticepolicyandresearch
AT anthonynatale intimatepartnerviolenceinnovationsintheorytoinformclinicalpracticepolicyandresearch
AT angelapharris intimatepartnerviolenceinnovationsintheorytoinformclinicalpracticepolicyandresearch