Intimate Partner Violence: Innovations in Theory to Inform Clinical Practice, Policy, and Research
Intimate partner violence (IPV) and intergenerational transmission of IPV in families are destructive social issues in need of considerable attention. Knowledge of the multi-level, complex causes, and consequences of IPV in the United States has increased significantly over the last two decades. Giv...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-05-01
|
Series: | Social Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/9/5/71 |
_version_ | 1797568600399151104 |
---|---|
author | David Axlyn McLeod Kirsten Havig Anthony Natale Angela Pharris |
author_facet | David Axlyn McLeod Kirsten Havig Anthony Natale Angela Pharris |
author_sort | David Axlyn McLeod |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Intimate partner violence (IPV) and intergenerational transmission of IPV in families are destructive social issues in need of considerable attention. Knowledge of the multi-level, complex causes, and consequences of IPV in the United States has increased significantly over the last two decades. Given these gains in learning, the authors’ aim here is to highlight recent critical and emerging theoretical perspectives on IPV. Frameworks included for application are intersectionality theory, historical trauma and decolonization, human rights, constructivist self-development theory, the posttraumatic growth paradigm, and adverse childhood experiences. This discussion will help to illuminate the dynamics of IPV that are actionable by practitioners using frameworks that promote cultural sensitivity, inclusion, and strengths-based practice with diverse populations. The authors discuss the scope of IPV while focusing on critical vulnerable people and exploring issues of relative privilege and oppression. Next, the authors review the historical body of theory informing understandings of IPV, and emerging theoretical frameworks on IPV. We offer conclusions throughout as they relate to the application of highlighted theories to IPV. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-10T19:59:14Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-4a473556e79a4d02a929cf62522c017b |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2076-0760 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-10T19:59:14Z |
publishDate | 2020-05-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Social Sciences |
spelling | doaj.art-4a473556e79a4d02a929cf62522c017b2023-11-19T23:41:58ZengMDPI AGSocial Sciences2076-07602020-05-01957110.3390/socsci9050071Intimate Partner Violence: Innovations in Theory to Inform Clinical Practice, Policy, and ResearchDavid Axlyn McLeod0Kirsten Havig1Anthony Natale2Angela Pharris3Anne and Henry Zarrow School of Social Work, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USACollege of Health Sciences, Division of Social Work, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, USAAnne and Henry Zarrow School of Social Work, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USAAnne and Henry Zarrow School of Social Work, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USAIntimate partner violence (IPV) and intergenerational transmission of IPV in families are destructive social issues in need of considerable attention. Knowledge of the multi-level, complex causes, and consequences of IPV in the United States has increased significantly over the last two decades. Given these gains in learning, the authors’ aim here is to highlight recent critical and emerging theoretical perspectives on IPV. Frameworks included for application are intersectionality theory, historical trauma and decolonization, human rights, constructivist self-development theory, the posttraumatic growth paradigm, and adverse childhood experiences. This discussion will help to illuminate the dynamics of IPV that are actionable by practitioners using frameworks that promote cultural sensitivity, inclusion, and strengths-based practice with diverse populations. The authors discuss the scope of IPV while focusing on critical vulnerable people and exploring issues of relative privilege and oppression. Next, the authors review the historical body of theory informing understandings of IPV, and emerging theoretical frameworks on IPV. We offer conclusions throughout as they relate to the application of highlighted theories to IPV.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/9/5/71intimate partner violencedomestic violencetheorytraumaintersectionalityhuman rights |
spellingShingle | David Axlyn McLeod Kirsten Havig Anthony Natale Angela Pharris Intimate Partner Violence: Innovations in Theory to Inform Clinical Practice, Policy, and Research Social Sciences intimate partner violence domestic violence theory trauma intersectionality human rights |
title | Intimate Partner Violence: Innovations in Theory to Inform Clinical Practice, Policy, and Research |
title_full | Intimate Partner Violence: Innovations in Theory to Inform Clinical Practice, Policy, and Research |
title_fullStr | Intimate Partner Violence: Innovations in Theory to Inform Clinical Practice, Policy, and Research |
title_full_unstemmed | Intimate Partner Violence: Innovations in Theory to Inform Clinical Practice, Policy, and Research |
title_short | Intimate Partner Violence: Innovations in Theory to Inform Clinical Practice, Policy, and Research |
title_sort | intimate partner violence innovations in theory to inform clinical practice policy and research |
topic | intimate partner violence domestic violence theory trauma intersectionality human rights |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/9/5/71 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT davidaxlynmcleod intimatepartnerviolenceinnovationsintheorytoinformclinicalpracticepolicyandresearch AT kirstenhavig intimatepartnerviolenceinnovationsintheorytoinformclinicalpracticepolicyandresearch AT anthonynatale intimatepartnerviolenceinnovationsintheorytoinformclinicalpracticepolicyandresearch AT angelapharris intimatepartnerviolenceinnovationsintheorytoinformclinicalpracticepolicyandresearch |