Comparative Study on the Influencing Factors of the Greenhouse Gas Budget in Typical Cities: Case Studies of Beijing and Shenzhen

Clarifying the pattern of the urban greenhouse gas (GHG) budget and its influencing factors is the basis of promoting urban low-carbon development. This paper takes Beijing and Shenzhen—the capital city and the most rapidly developing city in China, respectively—as case studies, comprehensively acco...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kuo Liu, Shishuai Yang, Binbin Huang, Chaofan Xian, Baolong Han, Tian Xie, Chengji Shu, Zhiwen Chen, Haoqi Wang, Haijun Wang, Fei Lu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-07-01
Series:Atmosphere
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/14/7/1158
_version_ 1797590291377553408
author Kuo Liu
Shishuai Yang
Binbin Huang
Chaofan Xian
Baolong Han
Tian Xie
Chengji Shu
Zhiwen Chen
Haoqi Wang
Haijun Wang
Fei Lu
author_facet Kuo Liu
Shishuai Yang
Binbin Huang
Chaofan Xian
Baolong Han
Tian Xie
Chengji Shu
Zhiwen Chen
Haoqi Wang
Haijun Wang
Fei Lu
author_sort Kuo Liu
collection DOAJ
description Clarifying the pattern of the urban greenhouse gas (GHG) budget and its influencing factors is the basis of promoting urban low-carbon development. This paper takes Beijing and Shenzhen—the capital city and the most rapidly developing city in China, respectively—as case studies, comprehensively accounts their GHG budgets from 2005 to 2020, and investigates and compares the factors affecting their GHG budgets. The total GHG emissions in Beijing were lowest in 2005 (160.3 TgCO<sub>2</sub> equivalents) and peaked at 227.7 TgCO<sub>2</sub> equivalents in 2019, and then decreased to 209.1 TgCO<sub>2</sub> equivalents in 2020. Meanwhile, the total GHG emissions in Shenzhen gradually increased from 36.0 TgCO<sub>2</sub> equivalents in 2005 to 121.4 TgCO<sub>2</sub> equivalents in 2019, and then decreased to 119.1 TgCO<sub>2</sub> equivalents in 2020. The energy activity sector was the greatest contributor to GHG emissions in this period, accounting for 82.5% and 76.0% of the total GHG emissions in Beijing and Shenzhen, respectively. The carbon sink of the ecosystems of these two cities could absorb only small parts of their emissions, and the neutralization rates of sinks ranged from 1.7% to 2.3% in Beijing and from 0.3% to 1.5% in Shenzhen. The enhancement of population, economic product, and consumption increased the greenhouse gas emissions in both cities. A 1% increase in population size, per capita GD (gross domestic product), and residential consumption level would increase total GHG emissions by 0.181%, 0.019%, and 0.030% in Beijing, respectively. The corresponding increases in Shenzhen would be 0.180%, 0.243%, and 0.172%, respectively. The household size had opposite effects on the two cities, i.e., a 1% increase in household size would increase GHG emissions by 0.487% in Shenzhen but reduce them by 2.083% in Beijing. Each 1% increase in secondary industry and energy intensity would reduce GHG emissions by 0.553% and 0.110% in Shenzhen, respectively, which are more significant reductions than those in Beijing.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T01:18:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4a4b9ff56cbc4d24aef6877524fa3be1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-4433
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T01:18:29Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Atmosphere
spelling doaj.art-4a4b9ff56cbc4d24aef6877524fa3be12023-11-18T18:16:19ZengMDPI AGAtmosphere2073-44332023-07-01147115810.3390/atmos14071158Comparative Study on the Influencing Factors of the Greenhouse Gas Budget in Typical Cities: Case Studies of Beijing and ShenzhenKuo Liu0Shishuai Yang1Binbin Huang2Chaofan Xian3Baolong Han4Tian Xie5Chengji Shu6Zhiwen Chen7Haoqi Wang8Haijun Wang9Fei Lu10School of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Yunnan University, Kunming 650504, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, ChinaInstitute for Ecological Research and Pollution Control of Plateau Lakes, School of Ecology and Environmental Science, Yunnan University, Kunming 650504, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, ChinaClarifying the pattern of the urban greenhouse gas (GHG) budget and its influencing factors is the basis of promoting urban low-carbon development. This paper takes Beijing and Shenzhen—the capital city and the most rapidly developing city in China, respectively—as case studies, comprehensively accounts their GHG budgets from 2005 to 2020, and investigates and compares the factors affecting their GHG budgets. The total GHG emissions in Beijing were lowest in 2005 (160.3 TgCO<sub>2</sub> equivalents) and peaked at 227.7 TgCO<sub>2</sub> equivalents in 2019, and then decreased to 209.1 TgCO<sub>2</sub> equivalents in 2020. Meanwhile, the total GHG emissions in Shenzhen gradually increased from 36.0 TgCO<sub>2</sub> equivalents in 2005 to 121.4 TgCO<sub>2</sub> equivalents in 2019, and then decreased to 119.1 TgCO<sub>2</sub> equivalents in 2020. The energy activity sector was the greatest contributor to GHG emissions in this period, accounting for 82.5% and 76.0% of the total GHG emissions in Beijing and Shenzhen, respectively. The carbon sink of the ecosystems of these two cities could absorb only small parts of their emissions, and the neutralization rates of sinks ranged from 1.7% to 2.3% in Beijing and from 0.3% to 1.5% in Shenzhen. The enhancement of population, economic product, and consumption increased the greenhouse gas emissions in both cities. A 1% increase in population size, per capita GD (gross domestic product), and residential consumption level would increase total GHG emissions by 0.181%, 0.019%, and 0.030% in Beijing, respectively. The corresponding increases in Shenzhen would be 0.180%, 0.243%, and 0.172%, respectively. The household size had opposite effects on the two cities, i.e., a 1% increase in household size would increase GHG emissions by 0.487% in Shenzhen but reduce them by 2.083% in Beijing. Each 1% increase in secondary industry and energy intensity would reduce GHG emissions by 0.553% and 0.110% in Shenzhen, respectively, which are more significant reductions than those in Beijing.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/14/7/1158BeijingShenzhengreenhouse gas emissionscarbon sinksinfluencing factors
spellingShingle Kuo Liu
Shishuai Yang
Binbin Huang
Chaofan Xian
Baolong Han
Tian Xie
Chengji Shu
Zhiwen Chen
Haoqi Wang
Haijun Wang
Fei Lu
Comparative Study on the Influencing Factors of the Greenhouse Gas Budget in Typical Cities: Case Studies of Beijing and Shenzhen
Atmosphere
Beijing
Shenzhen
greenhouse gas emissions
carbon sinks
influencing factors
title Comparative Study on the Influencing Factors of the Greenhouse Gas Budget in Typical Cities: Case Studies of Beijing and Shenzhen
title_full Comparative Study on the Influencing Factors of the Greenhouse Gas Budget in Typical Cities: Case Studies of Beijing and Shenzhen
title_fullStr Comparative Study on the Influencing Factors of the Greenhouse Gas Budget in Typical Cities: Case Studies of Beijing and Shenzhen
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study on the Influencing Factors of the Greenhouse Gas Budget in Typical Cities: Case Studies of Beijing and Shenzhen
title_short Comparative Study on the Influencing Factors of the Greenhouse Gas Budget in Typical Cities: Case Studies of Beijing and Shenzhen
title_sort comparative study on the influencing factors of the greenhouse gas budget in typical cities case studies of beijing and shenzhen
topic Beijing
Shenzhen
greenhouse gas emissions
carbon sinks
influencing factors
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/14/7/1158
work_keys_str_mv AT kuoliu comparativestudyontheinfluencingfactorsofthegreenhousegasbudgetintypicalcitiescasestudiesofbeijingandshenzhen
AT shishuaiyang comparativestudyontheinfluencingfactorsofthegreenhousegasbudgetintypicalcitiescasestudiesofbeijingandshenzhen
AT binbinhuang comparativestudyontheinfluencingfactorsofthegreenhousegasbudgetintypicalcitiescasestudiesofbeijingandshenzhen
AT chaofanxian comparativestudyontheinfluencingfactorsofthegreenhousegasbudgetintypicalcitiescasestudiesofbeijingandshenzhen
AT baolonghan comparativestudyontheinfluencingfactorsofthegreenhousegasbudgetintypicalcitiescasestudiesofbeijingandshenzhen
AT tianxie comparativestudyontheinfluencingfactorsofthegreenhousegasbudgetintypicalcitiescasestudiesofbeijingandshenzhen
AT chengjishu comparativestudyontheinfluencingfactorsofthegreenhousegasbudgetintypicalcitiescasestudiesofbeijingandshenzhen
AT zhiwenchen comparativestudyontheinfluencingfactorsofthegreenhousegasbudgetintypicalcitiescasestudiesofbeijingandshenzhen
AT haoqiwang comparativestudyontheinfluencingfactorsofthegreenhousegasbudgetintypicalcitiescasestudiesofbeijingandshenzhen
AT haijunwang comparativestudyontheinfluencingfactorsofthegreenhousegasbudgetintypicalcitiescasestudiesofbeijingandshenzhen
AT feilu comparativestudyontheinfluencingfactorsofthegreenhousegasbudgetintypicalcitiescasestudiesofbeijingandshenzhen