The gender gap in the United States: Housework across racialized groups

<b>Background</b>: Most resource-based theoretical frameworks in housework research are tested and further developed based on 'average' patterns. Consequently, in countries like the United States these frameworks rely heavily on the patterns among white women in relation to whi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kamila Kolpashnikova, Man-Yee Kan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research 2020-10-01
Series:Demographic Research
Online Access:https://www.demographic-research.org/articles/volume/43/36
_version_ 1797739468578357248
author Kamila Kolpashnikova
Man-Yee Kan
author_facet Kamila Kolpashnikova
Man-Yee Kan
author_sort Kamila Kolpashnikova
collection DOAJ
description <b>Background</b>: Most resource-based theoretical frameworks in housework research are tested and further developed based on 'average' patterns. Consequently, in countries like the United States these frameworks rely heavily on the patterns among white women in relation to white men. As such, the resource-based factors identified by the frameworks may work to estimate the housework division of white Americans rather than any other groups, particularly racialized women and men. <b>Objective</b>: We test the extent to which resource-based factors such as time availability and income can account for the gender gap in housework participation among white, Black, and Latinx women and men in the United States. <b>Methods</b>: Using the Kitagawa‒Oaxaca‒Blinder decomposition method, we analyze time-use diaries from the 2003-2018 American Time Use Survey. <b>Results</b>: We find that resource-based factors account for the gender gap in housework participation only when there are substantial resource differences between the contrasted groups, the exception being when the comparison is made with Black Americans. The results also show that when any group of women is compared with Black men, resource-based factors have little explanatory power in the intergroup time gap in housework participation. <b>Conclusions</b>: The findings imply that housework research may need to pay special attention to the diverse effects of gendering and racialization on the division of housework to avoid normalizing the theoretical frameworks that only work for the dominant white groups. <b>Contribution</b>: This study uses group-level decomposition analysis to compare how resource-based factors apply to the gender gap across racialized groups in the United States.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T13:58:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4a5c0179d1c84bd0baa20b7307431ad9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1435-9871
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T13:58:41Z
publishDate 2020-10-01
publisher Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research
record_format Article
series Demographic Research
spelling doaj.art-4a5c0179d1c84bd0baa20b7307431ad92023-08-22T09:45:04ZengMax Planck Institute for Demographic ResearchDemographic Research1435-98712020-10-01433610.4054/DemRes.2020.43.364726The gender gap in the United States: Housework across racialized groupsKamila Kolpashnikova0Man-Yee Kan1University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford<b>Background</b>: Most resource-based theoretical frameworks in housework research are tested and further developed based on 'average' patterns. Consequently, in countries like the United States these frameworks rely heavily on the patterns among white women in relation to white men. As such, the resource-based factors identified by the frameworks may work to estimate the housework division of white Americans rather than any other groups, particularly racialized women and men. <b>Objective</b>: We test the extent to which resource-based factors such as time availability and income can account for the gender gap in housework participation among white, Black, and Latinx women and men in the United States. <b>Methods</b>: Using the Kitagawa‒Oaxaca‒Blinder decomposition method, we analyze time-use diaries from the 2003-2018 American Time Use Survey. <b>Results</b>: We find that resource-based factors account for the gender gap in housework participation only when there are substantial resource differences between the contrasted groups, the exception being when the comparison is made with Black Americans. The results also show that when any group of women is compared with Black men, resource-based factors have little explanatory power in the intergroup time gap in housework participation. <b>Conclusions</b>: The findings imply that housework research may need to pay special attention to the diverse effects of gendering and racialization on the division of housework to avoid normalizing the theoretical frameworks that only work for the dominant white groups. <b>Contribution</b>: This study uses group-level decomposition analysis to compare how resource-based factors apply to the gender gap across racialized groups in the United States.https://www.demographic-research.org/articles/volume/43/36
spellingShingle Kamila Kolpashnikova
Man-Yee Kan
The gender gap in the United States: Housework across racialized groups
Demographic Research
title The gender gap in the United States: Housework across racialized groups
title_full The gender gap in the United States: Housework across racialized groups
title_fullStr The gender gap in the United States: Housework across racialized groups
title_full_unstemmed The gender gap in the United States: Housework across racialized groups
title_short The gender gap in the United States: Housework across racialized groups
title_sort gender gap in the united states housework across racialized groups
url https://www.demographic-research.org/articles/volume/43/36
work_keys_str_mv AT kamilakolpashnikova thegendergapintheunitedstateshouseworkacrossracializedgroups
AT manyeekan thegendergapintheunitedstateshouseworkacrossracializedgroups
AT kamilakolpashnikova gendergapintheunitedstateshouseworkacrossracializedgroups
AT manyeekan gendergapintheunitedstateshouseworkacrossracializedgroups