Positioning of facts, meanings and terms in the media: theoretical approaches and practice of covering the problems of terrorism

<p>The interpretation and interrelation of the concepts of “fact”, “meaning”, “term” throughout the 20th–21st centuries were constantly in the zone of interest of researchers: sociologists, philosophers, cultural scientists, linguists, lawyers, as well as writers and journalists. At the same t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Alexander N. Chumikov
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Russian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS), Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology 2024-03-01
Series:Социологическая наука и социальная практика
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.socnp.ru/index.php/snsp/article/view/9371/9167
_version_ 1797222509259522048
author Alexander N. Chumikov
author_facet Alexander N. Chumikov
author_sort Alexander N. Chumikov
collection DOAJ
description <p>The interpretation and interrelation of the concepts of “fact”, “meaning”, “term” throughout the 20th–21st centuries were constantly in the zone of interest of researchers: sociologists, philosophers, cultural scientists, linguists, lawyers, as well as writers and journalists. At the same time, this connection, outwardly understandable and logical, was understood as an increasingly complex composition, depending both on the peculiarities of human perception and on the social modeling of various kinds of messages to target audiences. This article examines the dynamics and current state of these ideas, connected, on the one hand, with the internetization and mediatization of society; and, on the other, motivated by the presence and strengthening of the global socio-political conjuncture at the interstate and other levels. The author’s research focuses on the problems of terrorism as the most acute and revealing. There is no unified internationally accepted definition of terrorism. To an even greater extent, this applies to social practice, in the process of which the perpetrators and customers of terrorist attacks are determined by interested parties in different ways, up to the complete opposite. The immediate facts of terror are interpreted in the same way, when the fixation of a real event is supplemented or completely replaced by a demonstration of its meaning. The article examines the prerequisites and modern practice of creating and subsequent application of factual, meaning and terms elements in the compositions of published messages. By analyzing the materials of Russian and Western mass media, the author explores the dynamic change in the goals and roles of these elements in influencing target audiences. In the course of the study, the hypothesis is put forward and confirmed that reports of acts of terror turn into an instrument of information warfare, and their semantic part acquires a dominant character. Technologies are being developed to verify the facts for authenticity and identify the primary goals of the authors of the messages. However, the priority form of counter-actions is the formation of stereotypical attitudes among target groups to the rejection of events, statements and their content designations in the media, qualified by the state as terrorist.</p>
first_indexed 2024-04-24T13:22:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4a5cb573ff514abbb15d5248baf4a315
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2308-6416
2413-6891
language Russian
last_indexed 2024-04-24T13:22:27Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Russian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS), Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology
record_format Article
series Социологическая наука и социальная практика
spelling doaj.art-4a5cb573ff514abbb15d5248baf4a3152024-04-04T11:05:01ZrusRussian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS), Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied SociologyСоциологическая наука и социальная практика2308-64162413-68912024-03-011219411910.19181/snsp.2024.12.1.59371Positioning of facts, meanings and terms in the media: theoretical approaches and practice of covering the problems of terrorismAlexander N. Chumikov0Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS<p>The interpretation and interrelation of the concepts of “fact”, “meaning”, “term” throughout the 20th–21st centuries were constantly in the zone of interest of researchers: sociologists, philosophers, cultural scientists, linguists, lawyers, as well as writers and journalists. At the same time, this connection, outwardly understandable and logical, was understood as an increasingly complex composition, depending both on the peculiarities of human perception and on the social modeling of various kinds of messages to target audiences. This article examines the dynamics and current state of these ideas, connected, on the one hand, with the internetization and mediatization of society; and, on the other, motivated by the presence and strengthening of the global socio-political conjuncture at the interstate and other levels. The author’s research focuses on the problems of terrorism as the most acute and revealing. There is no unified internationally accepted definition of terrorism. To an even greater extent, this applies to social practice, in the process of which the perpetrators and customers of terrorist attacks are determined by interested parties in different ways, up to the complete opposite. The immediate facts of terror are interpreted in the same way, when the fixation of a real event is supplemented or completely replaced by a demonstration of its meaning. The article examines the prerequisites and modern practice of creating and subsequent application of factual, meaning and terms elements in the compositions of published messages. By analyzing the materials of Russian and Western mass media, the author explores the dynamic change in the goals and roles of these elements in influencing target audiences. In the course of the study, the hypothesis is put forward and confirmed that reports of acts of terror turn into an instrument of information warfare, and their semantic part acquires a dominant character. Technologies are being developed to verify the facts for authenticity and identify the primary goals of the authors of the messages. However, the priority form of counter-actions is the formation of stereotypical attitudes among target groups to the rejection of events, statements and their content designations in the media, qualified by the state as terrorist.</p>https://www.socnp.ru/index.php/snsp/article/view/9371/9167factfact checkingmeaningmeaning formationtermmediapost-truthstereotypeinformation standardterrorizm
spellingShingle Alexander N. Chumikov
Positioning of facts, meanings and terms in the media: theoretical approaches and practice of covering the problems of terrorism
Социологическая наука и социальная практика
fact
fact checking
meaning
meaning formation
term
media
post-truth
stereotype
information standard
terrorizm
title Positioning of facts, meanings and terms in the media: theoretical approaches and practice of covering the problems of terrorism
title_full Positioning of facts, meanings and terms in the media: theoretical approaches and practice of covering the problems of terrorism
title_fullStr Positioning of facts, meanings and terms in the media: theoretical approaches and practice of covering the problems of terrorism
title_full_unstemmed Positioning of facts, meanings and terms in the media: theoretical approaches and practice of covering the problems of terrorism
title_short Positioning of facts, meanings and terms in the media: theoretical approaches and practice of covering the problems of terrorism
title_sort positioning of facts meanings and terms in the media theoretical approaches and practice of covering the problems of terrorism
topic fact
fact checking
meaning
meaning formation
term
media
post-truth
stereotype
information standard
terrorizm
url https://www.socnp.ru/index.php/snsp/article/view/9371/9167
work_keys_str_mv AT alexandernchumikov positioningoffactsmeaningsandtermsinthemediatheoreticalapproachesandpracticeofcoveringtheproblemsofterrorism