Evaluating the Preconditions of Two Remote Sensing SWE Retrieval Algorithms over the US

A large amount of fresh water resources are stored in the snowpack, which is the primary source of water for streamflow in many places at middle-to-high latitude areas. Therefore, snow water equivalent (SWE) is a key parameter in the water cycle. Active and passive microwave remote sensing methods h...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shadi Oveisgharan, Daniel Esteban-Fernandez, Duane Waliser, Randall Friedl, Son Nghiem, Xubin Zeng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-06-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/12/12/2021
_version_ 1827714326900768768
author Shadi Oveisgharan
Daniel Esteban-Fernandez
Duane Waliser
Randall Friedl
Son Nghiem
Xubin Zeng
author_facet Shadi Oveisgharan
Daniel Esteban-Fernandez
Duane Waliser
Randall Friedl
Son Nghiem
Xubin Zeng
author_sort Shadi Oveisgharan
collection DOAJ
description A large amount of fresh water resources are stored in the snowpack, which is the primary source of water for streamflow in many places at middle-to-high latitude areas. Therefore, snow water equivalent (SWE) is a key parameter in the water cycle. Active and passive microwave remote sensing methods have been used to retrieve SWE due to relatively poor resolution of current in situ interpolated maps with good accuracy. However, estimation of SWE has proved challenging, despite several decades of efforts to develop retrieval approaches. Active sensors provide higher-resolution observations. Two recent promising retrieval algorithms using active data are dual frequency dual polarization backscattered power and differential interferometry. These retrieval algorithms have some restrictions on snow characteristics, the environment, and instrument properties. The restrictions limit the snow that is suitable for the specific retrieval algorithm. In order to better understand how much of the snowpack satisfies the precondition of these retrieval approaches, we use a 4 km gridded snowpack product over the contiguous US for years 1997 and 2015. We use a simple scattering model to simulate the scattering characteristics of snow. The snow property maps, simulated scattering characteristics of snow, and environmental conditions are used to filter the suitable snow for each retrieval algorithm. We show that snow wetness and vegetation coverage are the two main limiting conditions for these retrieval algorithms. We show that 39% and 44% of the grid-points with snow satisfy the preconditions of dual polarization dual frequency retrieval algorithms at 13.5 GHz (one of the recommended frequencies for this algorithm in the literature) in 1997 and 2015, respectively. The most important limiting factors for dual polarization dual frequency retrieval method are dryness of snow, penetration depth, and vegetation-free constraints. The backscattered power in dual polarization dual frequency method is more sensitive to snow density and grain radius rather than to snow depth. We also show that 55% and 53% of the grid-points with snow satisfy the precondition of differential interferometry retrieval algorithms at 1 GHz (one of the recommended frequencies for this algorithm in the literature) in 1997 and 2015, respectively. The most important precondition-limiting factors for differential interferometry are dryness of snow and vegetation-free constraints. The differential interferometry phase retrieval algorithm is equally sensitive to snow height and snow density variations and is independent of snow grain radius.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T18:55:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4a6c060474834dbfbdbeb143abb326ab
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-4292
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T18:55:12Z
publishDate 2020-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Remote Sensing
spelling doaj.art-4a6c060474834dbfbdbeb143abb326ab2023-11-20T04:47:21ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922020-06-011212202110.3390/rs12122021Evaluating the Preconditions of Two Remote Sensing SWE Retrieval Algorithms over the USShadi Oveisgharan0Daniel Esteban-Fernandez1Duane Waliser2Randall Friedl3Son Nghiem4Xubin Zeng5Jet Propulsion Lab, Pasadena, CA 91109, USAJet Propulsion Lab, Pasadena, CA 91109, USAJet Propulsion Lab, Pasadena, CA 91109, USAJet Propulsion Lab, Pasadena, CA 91109, USAJet Propulsion Lab, Pasadena, CA 91109, USADepartment of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85719, USAA large amount of fresh water resources are stored in the snowpack, which is the primary source of water for streamflow in many places at middle-to-high latitude areas. Therefore, snow water equivalent (SWE) is a key parameter in the water cycle. Active and passive microwave remote sensing methods have been used to retrieve SWE due to relatively poor resolution of current in situ interpolated maps with good accuracy. However, estimation of SWE has proved challenging, despite several decades of efforts to develop retrieval approaches. Active sensors provide higher-resolution observations. Two recent promising retrieval algorithms using active data are dual frequency dual polarization backscattered power and differential interferometry. These retrieval algorithms have some restrictions on snow characteristics, the environment, and instrument properties. The restrictions limit the snow that is suitable for the specific retrieval algorithm. In order to better understand how much of the snowpack satisfies the precondition of these retrieval approaches, we use a 4 km gridded snowpack product over the contiguous US for years 1997 and 2015. We use a simple scattering model to simulate the scattering characteristics of snow. The snow property maps, simulated scattering characteristics of snow, and environmental conditions are used to filter the suitable snow for each retrieval algorithm. We show that snow wetness and vegetation coverage are the two main limiting conditions for these retrieval algorithms. We show that 39% and 44% of the grid-points with snow satisfy the preconditions of dual polarization dual frequency retrieval algorithms at 13.5 GHz (one of the recommended frequencies for this algorithm in the literature) in 1997 and 2015, respectively. The most important limiting factors for dual polarization dual frequency retrieval method are dryness of snow, penetration depth, and vegetation-free constraints. The backscattered power in dual polarization dual frequency method is more sensitive to snow density and grain radius rather than to snow depth. We also show that 55% and 53% of the grid-points with snow satisfy the precondition of differential interferometry retrieval algorithms at 1 GHz (one of the recommended frequencies for this algorithm in the literature) in 1997 and 2015, respectively. The most important precondition-limiting factors for differential interferometry are dryness of snow and vegetation-free constraints. The differential interferometry phase retrieval algorithm is equally sensitive to snow height and snow density variations and is independent of snow grain radius.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/12/12/2021SWEretrievalsensitivitydifferential interferometrydual polarization dual frequency
spellingShingle Shadi Oveisgharan
Daniel Esteban-Fernandez
Duane Waliser
Randall Friedl
Son Nghiem
Xubin Zeng
Evaluating the Preconditions of Two Remote Sensing SWE Retrieval Algorithms over the US
Remote Sensing
SWE
retrieval
sensitivity
differential interferometry
dual polarization dual frequency
title Evaluating the Preconditions of Two Remote Sensing SWE Retrieval Algorithms over the US
title_full Evaluating the Preconditions of Two Remote Sensing SWE Retrieval Algorithms over the US
title_fullStr Evaluating the Preconditions of Two Remote Sensing SWE Retrieval Algorithms over the US
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the Preconditions of Two Remote Sensing SWE Retrieval Algorithms over the US
title_short Evaluating the Preconditions of Two Remote Sensing SWE Retrieval Algorithms over the US
title_sort evaluating the preconditions of two remote sensing swe retrieval algorithms over the us
topic SWE
retrieval
sensitivity
differential interferometry
dual polarization dual frequency
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/12/12/2021
work_keys_str_mv AT shadioveisgharan evaluatingthepreconditionsoftworemotesensingsweretrievalalgorithmsovertheus
AT danielestebanfernandez evaluatingthepreconditionsoftworemotesensingsweretrievalalgorithmsovertheus
AT duanewaliser evaluatingthepreconditionsoftworemotesensingsweretrievalalgorithmsovertheus
AT randallfriedl evaluatingthepreconditionsoftworemotesensingsweretrievalalgorithmsovertheus
AT sonnghiem evaluatingthepreconditionsoftworemotesensingsweretrievalalgorithmsovertheus
AT xubinzeng evaluatingthepreconditionsoftworemotesensingsweretrievalalgorithmsovertheus