The Law Regarding Pension Interest in South Africa has been settled! Or has It? With Reference to Ndaba v Ndaba (600/2015) [2016] ZASCA 162

This article reflects on the law relating to pension interest in South Africa. In particular, it assesses whether the Supreme Court of Appeal in Ndaba v Ndaba (600/2015) [2016] ZASCA 162 adequately clarified how this area of law should be understood. In the light of the inconsistent approaches from...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Motseotsile Clement Marumoagae
Format: Article
Language:Afrikaans
Published: North-West University 2017-03-01
Series:Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.assaf.org.za/per/article/view/1637/1823
_version_ 1818159620798021632
author Motseotsile Clement Marumoagae
author_facet Motseotsile Clement Marumoagae
author_sort Motseotsile Clement Marumoagae
collection DOAJ
description This article reflects on the law relating to pension interest in South Africa. In particular, it assesses whether the Supreme Court of Appeal in Ndaba v Ndaba (600/2015) [2016] ZASCA 162 adequately clarified how this area of law should be understood. In the light of the inconsistent approaches from various divisions of the High Court, it has not always been clear how the courts should interpret the law relating to pension interest in South Africa. In this paper, aspects of this area of law which have been clarified by the Supreme Court of Appeal are addressed. The paper also addresses aspects of this area of law which the Supreme Court of Appeal had not settled and which could potentially be subject to future litigation. The paper is based on the premise that while Ndaba v Ndaba is welcomed, the Supreme Court of Appeal nonetheless missed a golden opportunity to authoritatively provide a basis upon which the law relating to pension interest in South Africa should be understood.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T15:48:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4a733388f13e43178e26555f565ec5d4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1727-3781
language Afrikaans
last_indexed 2024-12-11T15:48:53Z
publishDate 2017-03-01
publisher North-West University
record_format Article
series Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal
spelling doaj.art-4a733388f13e43178e26555f565ec5d42022-12-22T00:59:37ZafrNorth-West UniversityPotchefstroom Electronic Law Journal1727-37812017-03-0120122http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2017/v20n0a1637The Law Regarding Pension Interest in South Africa has been settled! Or has It? With Reference to Ndaba v Ndaba (600/2015) [2016] ZASCA 162Motseotsile Clement Marumoagae0University of the WitwatersrandThis article reflects on the law relating to pension interest in South Africa. In particular, it assesses whether the Supreme Court of Appeal in Ndaba v Ndaba (600/2015) [2016] ZASCA 162 adequately clarified how this area of law should be understood. In the light of the inconsistent approaches from various divisions of the High Court, it has not always been clear how the courts should interpret the law relating to pension interest in South Africa. In this paper, aspects of this area of law which have been clarified by the Supreme Court of Appeal are addressed. The paper also addresses aspects of this area of law which the Supreme Court of Appeal had not settled and which could potentially be subject to future litigation. The paper is based on the premise that while Ndaba v Ndaba is welcomed, the Supreme Court of Appeal nonetheless missed a golden opportunity to authoritatively provide a basis upon which the law relating to pension interest in South Africa should be understood.http://journals.assaf.org.za/per/article/view/1637/1823Pension interestentitlementdivorcepension fundspouse
spellingShingle Motseotsile Clement Marumoagae
The Law Regarding Pension Interest in South Africa has been settled! Or has It? With Reference to Ndaba v Ndaba (600/2015) [2016] ZASCA 162
Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal
Pension interest
entitlement
divorce
pension fund
spouse
title The Law Regarding Pension Interest in South Africa has been settled! Or has It? With Reference to Ndaba v Ndaba (600/2015) [2016] ZASCA 162
title_full The Law Regarding Pension Interest in South Africa has been settled! Or has It? With Reference to Ndaba v Ndaba (600/2015) [2016] ZASCA 162
title_fullStr The Law Regarding Pension Interest in South Africa has been settled! Or has It? With Reference to Ndaba v Ndaba (600/2015) [2016] ZASCA 162
title_full_unstemmed The Law Regarding Pension Interest in South Africa has been settled! Or has It? With Reference to Ndaba v Ndaba (600/2015) [2016] ZASCA 162
title_short The Law Regarding Pension Interest in South Africa has been settled! Or has It? With Reference to Ndaba v Ndaba (600/2015) [2016] ZASCA 162
title_sort law regarding pension interest in south africa has been settled or has it with reference to ndaba v ndaba 600 2015 2016 zasca 162
topic Pension interest
entitlement
divorce
pension fund
spouse
url http://journals.assaf.org.za/per/article/view/1637/1823
work_keys_str_mv AT motseotsileclementmarumoagae thelawregardingpensioninterestinsouthafricahasbeensettledorhasitwithreferencetondabavndaba60020152016zasca162
AT motseotsileclementmarumoagae lawregardingpensioninterestinsouthafricahasbeensettledorhasitwithreferencetondabavndaba60020152016zasca162