The Law Regarding Pension Interest in South Africa has been settled! Or has It? With Reference to Ndaba v Ndaba (600/2015) [2016] ZASCA 162
This article reflects on the law relating to pension interest in South Africa. In particular, it assesses whether the Supreme Court of Appeal in Ndaba v Ndaba (600/2015) [2016] ZASCA 162 adequately clarified how this area of law should be understood. In the light of the inconsistent approaches from...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Afrikaans |
Published: |
North-West University
2017-03-01
|
Series: | Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journals.assaf.org.za/per/article/view/1637/1823 |
_version_ | 1818159620798021632 |
---|---|
author | Motseotsile Clement Marumoagae |
author_facet | Motseotsile Clement Marumoagae |
author_sort | Motseotsile Clement Marumoagae |
collection | DOAJ |
description | This article reflects on the law relating to pension interest in South Africa. In particular, it assesses whether the Supreme Court of Appeal in Ndaba v Ndaba (600/2015) [2016] ZASCA 162 adequately clarified how this area of law should be understood. In the light of the inconsistent approaches from various divisions of the High Court, it has not always been clear how the courts should interpret the law relating to pension interest in South Africa. In this paper, aspects of this area of law which have been clarified by the Supreme Court of Appeal are addressed. The paper also addresses aspects of this area of law which the Supreme Court of Appeal had not settled and which could potentially be subject to future litigation. The paper is based on the premise that while Ndaba v Ndaba is welcomed, the Supreme Court of Appeal nonetheless missed a golden opportunity to authoritatively provide a basis upon which the law relating to pension interest in South Africa should be understood. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-11T15:48:53Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-4a733388f13e43178e26555f565ec5d4 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1727-3781 |
language | Afrikaans |
last_indexed | 2024-12-11T15:48:53Z |
publishDate | 2017-03-01 |
publisher | North-West University |
record_format | Article |
series | Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal |
spelling | doaj.art-4a733388f13e43178e26555f565ec5d42022-12-22T00:59:37ZafrNorth-West UniversityPotchefstroom Electronic Law Journal1727-37812017-03-0120122http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2017/v20n0a1637The Law Regarding Pension Interest in South Africa has been settled! Or has It? With Reference to Ndaba v Ndaba (600/2015) [2016] ZASCA 162Motseotsile Clement Marumoagae0University of the WitwatersrandThis article reflects on the law relating to pension interest in South Africa. In particular, it assesses whether the Supreme Court of Appeal in Ndaba v Ndaba (600/2015) [2016] ZASCA 162 adequately clarified how this area of law should be understood. In the light of the inconsistent approaches from various divisions of the High Court, it has not always been clear how the courts should interpret the law relating to pension interest in South Africa. In this paper, aspects of this area of law which have been clarified by the Supreme Court of Appeal are addressed. The paper also addresses aspects of this area of law which the Supreme Court of Appeal had not settled and which could potentially be subject to future litigation. The paper is based on the premise that while Ndaba v Ndaba is welcomed, the Supreme Court of Appeal nonetheless missed a golden opportunity to authoritatively provide a basis upon which the law relating to pension interest in South Africa should be understood.http://journals.assaf.org.za/per/article/view/1637/1823Pension interestentitlementdivorcepension fundspouse |
spellingShingle | Motseotsile Clement Marumoagae The Law Regarding Pension Interest in South Africa has been settled! Or has It? With Reference to Ndaba v Ndaba (600/2015) [2016] ZASCA 162 Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal Pension interest entitlement divorce pension fund spouse |
title | The Law Regarding Pension Interest in South Africa has been settled! Or has It? With Reference to Ndaba v Ndaba (600/2015) [2016] ZASCA 162 |
title_full | The Law Regarding Pension Interest in South Africa has been settled! Or has It? With Reference to Ndaba v Ndaba (600/2015) [2016] ZASCA 162 |
title_fullStr | The Law Regarding Pension Interest in South Africa has been settled! Or has It? With Reference to Ndaba v Ndaba (600/2015) [2016] ZASCA 162 |
title_full_unstemmed | The Law Regarding Pension Interest in South Africa has been settled! Or has It? With Reference to Ndaba v Ndaba (600/2015) [2016] ZASCA 162 |
title_short | The Law Regarding Pension Interest in South Africa has been settled! Or has It? With Reference to Ndaba v Ndaba (600/2015) [2016] ZASCA 162 |
title_sort | law regarding pension interest in south africa has been settled or has it with reference to ndaba v ndaba 600 2015 2016 zasca 162 |
topic | Pension interest entitlement divorce pension fund spouse |
url | http://journals.assaf.org.za/per/article/view/1637/1823 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT motseotsileclementmarumoagae thelawregardingpensioninterestinsouthafricahasbeensettledorhasitwithreferencetondabavndaba60020152016zasca162 AT motseotsileclementmarumoagae lawregardingpensioninterestinsouthafricahasbeensettledorhasitwithreferencetondabavndaba60020152016zasca162 |