How do health practitioners in a large Australian public hospital identify and respond to reproductive abuse? A qualitative study

Abstract Objective: Reproductive abuse is defined as a deliberate attempt to control or interfere with a woman’s reproductive choices. It is associated with a range of negative health outcomes and presents a hidden challenge for health practitioners. There is a dearth of research on reproductive abu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laura Tarzia, Molly Wellington, Jennifer Marino, Kelsey Hegarty
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019-10-01
Series:Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.12923
_version_ 1797758022073712640
author Laura Tarzia
Molly Wellington
Jennifer Marino
Kelsey Hegarty
author_facet Laura Tarzia
Molly Wellington
Jennifer Marino
Kelsey Hegarty
author_sort Laura Tarzia
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective: Reproductive abuse is defined as a deliberate attempt to control or interfere with a woman’s reproductive choices. It is associated with a range of negative health outcomes and presents a hidden challenge for health practitioners. There is a dearth of research on reproductive abuse, particularly qualitative research. This study aims to address this gap by exploring how health practitioners in a large Australian public hospital identify and respond to reproductive abuse. Methods: We conducted semi‐structured interviews with n=17 health practitioners working across multiple disciplines within a large metropolitan public hospital in Victoria. Data were analysed thematically. Results: Three themes were developed: Figuring out that something is wrong; Creating a safe space to work out what she wants; and Everyone needs to do their part. Conclusions: Practitioners relied on intuition developed through experience to identify reproductive abuse. Once identified, most practitioners described a woman‐led response promoting safety; however, there were inconsistencies in how this was enacted across different professions. Lack of clarity around the level of response required was also a barrier. Implications for public health: Our findings highlight the pressing need for evidence‐based guidelines for health practitioners and a ‘best practice’ model specific to reproductive abuse.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T18:23:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4a76f857b8724c30bed6fce539d1bf82
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1326-0200
1753-6405
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T18:23:52Z
publishDate 2019-10-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
spelling doaj.art-4a76f857b8724c30bed6fce539d1bf822023-08-02T08:39:30ZengElsevierAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health1326-02001753-64052019-10-0143545746310.1111/1753-6405.12923How do health practitioners in a large Australian public hospital identify and respond to reproductive abuse? A qualitative studyLaura Tarzia0Molly Wellington1Jennifer Marino2Kelsey Hegarty3Department of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, VictoriaDepartment of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, VictoriaDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne and the Royal Women’s Hospital, VictoriaDepartment of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, VictoriaAbstract Objective: Reproductive abuse is defined as a deliberate attempt to control or interfere with a woman’s reproductive choices. It is associated with a range of negative health outcomes and presents a hidden challenge for health practitioners. There is a dearth of research on reproductive abuse, particularly qualitative research. This study aims to address this gap by exploring how health practitioners in a large Australian public hospital identify and respond to reproductive abuse. Methods: We conducted semi‐structured interviews with n=17 health practitioners working across multiple disciplines within a large metropolitan public hospital in Victoria. Data were analysed thematically. Results: Three themes were developed: Figuring out that something is wrong; Creating a safe space to work out what she wants; and Everyone needs to do their part. Conclusions: Practitioners relied on intuition developed through experience to identify reproductive abuse. Once identified, most practitioners described a woman‐led response promoting safety; however, there were inconsistencies in how this was enacted across different professions. Lack of clarity around the level of response required was also a barrier. Implications for public health: Our findings highlight the pressing need for evidence‐based guidelines for health practitioners and a ‘best practice’ model specific to reproductive abuse.https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.12923reproductive coercionhealth practitionersqualitative methodsviolence against women
spellingShingle Laura Tarzia
Molly Wellington
Jennifer Marino
Kelsey Hegarty
How do health practitioners in a large Australian public hospital identify and respond to reproductive abuse? A qualitative study
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
reproductive coercion
health practitioners
qualitative methods
violence against women
title How do health practitioners in a large Australian public hospital identify and respond to reproductive abuse? A qualitative study
title_full How do health practitioners in a large Australian public hospital identify and respond to reproductive abuse? A qualitative study
title_fullStr How do health practitioners in a large Australian public hospital identify and respond to reproductive abuse? A qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed How do health practitioners in a large Australian public hospital identify and respond to reproductive abuse? A qualitative study
title_short How do health practitioners in a large Australian public hospital identify and respond to reproductive abuse? A qualitative study
title_sort how do health practitioners in a large australian public hospital identify and respond to reproductive abuse a qualitative study
topic reproductive coercion
health practitioners
qualitative methods
violence against women
url https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.12923
work_keys_str_mv AT lauratarzia howdohealthpractitionersinalargeaustralianpublichospitalidentifyandrespondtoreproductiveabuseaqualitativestudy
AT mollywellington howdohealthpractitionersinalargeaustralianpublichospitalidentifyandrespondtoreproductiveabuseaqualitativestudy
AT jennifermarino howdohealthpractitionersinalargeaustralianpublichospitalidentifyandrespondtoreproductiveabuseaqualitativestudy
AT kelseyhegarty howdohealthpractitionersinalargeaustralianpublichospitalidentifyandrespondtoreproductiveabuseaqualitativestudy