Spór o uniwersalia

The problem of universals has been taken over by the medieval philosophers through the commentators, especially by Porfiriusz. Medieval philosophers had united issues mentioned by Porfiriusz with response to Boecjusz, creating an alternative: “thing” or “ word”. The most staunch phase of the dispute...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Anna Jaroszewska
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Adam Mickiewicz University 2012-12-01
Series:Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna
Subjects:
Online Access:https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/fped/article/view/13643
_version_ 1818778896902914048
author Anna Jaroszewska
author_facet Anna Jaroszewska
author_sort Anna Jaroszewska
collection DOAJ
description The problem of universals has been taken over by the medieval philosophers through the commentators, especially by Porfiriusz. Medieval philosophers had united issues mentioned by Porfiriusz with response to Boecjusz, creating an alternative: “thing” or “ word”. The most staunch phase of the dispute took place in the XI and XII centuries around two positions: “a realistic” and “nominalistic”, there has been an attempt to reach a compromise by marginal discarding; then three concepts was developed: “conceptualism” (“sermonizm”), “moderate conceptual realism” or “set theory”.
first_indexed 2024-12-18T11:52:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4a9d6e1584f8453fae0feb0c7bbe7043
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2299-1875
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T11:52:01Z
publishDate 2012-12-01
publisher Adam Mickiewicz University
record_format Article
series Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna
spelling doaj.art-4a9d6e1584f8453fae0feb0c7bbe70432022-12-21T21:09:09ZengAdam Mickiewicz UniversityFilozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna2299-18752012-12-011210.14746/fped.2012.1.2.913643Spór o uniwersaliaAnna Jaroszewska0Instytut Filozofii, Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w PoznaniuThe problem of universals has been taken over by the medieval philosophers through the commentators, especially by Porfiriusz. Medieval philosophers had united issues mentioned by Porfiriusz with response to Boecjusz, creating an alternative: “thing” or “ word”. The most staunch phase of the dispute took place in the XI and XII centuries around two positions: “a realistic” and “nominalistic”, there has been an attempt to reach a compromise by marginal discarding; then three concepts was developed: “conceptualism” (“sermonizm”), “moderate conceptual realism” or “set theory”.https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/fped/article/view/13643universalsPorfiriusza realisticnominalisticconceptualism
spellingShingle Anna Jaroszewska
Spór o uniwersalia
Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna
universals
Porfiriusz
a realistic
nominalistic
conceptualism
title Spór o uniwersalia
title_full Spór o uniwersalia
title_fullStr Spór o uniwersalia
title_full_unstemmed Spór o uniwersalia
title_short Spór o uniwersalia
title_sort spor o uniwersalia
topic universals
Porfiriusz
a realistic
nominalistic
conceptualism
url https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/fped/article/view/13643
work_keys_str_mv AT annajaroszewska sporouniwersalia