Linguistic Spatial Violence: The Muslim Cameleers in the Australian Outback

<span id="docs-internal-guid-836c9fcb-7fff-de38-9b72-e07e3cc1a5c9"><p dir="ltr"><span>Architectural space can be both absent or present. Architectural absence in previously architected space represents a manifestation of violence and removal. Whether through hum...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Joshua Nash
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: eScholarship Publishing, University of California 2018-11-01
Series:Refract
Subjects:
Online Access:http://escholarship.org/uc/item/31w7t9f3
_version_ 1818335939402924032
author Joshua Nash
author_facet Joshua Nash
author_sort Joshua Nash
collection DOAJ
description <span id="docs-internal-guid-836c9fcb-7fff-de38-9b72-e07e3cc1a5c9"><p dir="ltr"><span>Architectural space can be both absent or present. Architectural absence in previously architected space represents a manifestation of violence and removal. Whether through human, temporal, or natural induction, the disappearance and elimination of architectural form reveals the role of process in creation–deconstruction of both the linguistic and the architectural. I pose linguistic space as the absence of the architectural. The Muslim cameleers in the Australian outback built and forged their architecture and spatial behaviour in the un(der)privileged foundations of what was for these camel drovers a foreign land. While most of their architecture is now gone, helped through apparently violent instruments of time and neglect, their linguistic spatiality protrudes unfadingly in the form of personal names and placenames (toponyms) embedded in the(ir) cultural landscapes-cum-archiscapes. In these remote and removed bivouacs, our subjects built with force and were driven to the edges of their towns to eke out their livelihood. They travelled far, spoke their languages, redistributed creole cants and architectural vernaculars, and used local means to devise their own miniature organisational vehemence (read: spatial violence through building). I use the methodology of (linguistic) spatial writing to link the presence of linguistic landscape ephemera in the namespace/namescape to the absent architectural traces of our amateur builder exemplars. This narrative should be of interest not only to scholars of architectural spatial writing but also linguists of minority languages, students of the linguistic landscape, and historians of violence in colonial localities.</span></p><div><span><br /></span></div></span>
first_indexed 2024-12-13T14:31:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4aa6cb233823499c84896d9adf2b9d4d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2640-9429
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T14:31:23Z
publishDate 2018-11-01
publisher eScholarship Publishing, University of California
record_format Article
series Refract
spelling doaj.art-4aa6cb233823499c84896d9adf2b9d4d2022-12-21T23:41:49ZengeScholarship Publishing, University of CaliforniaRefract2640-94292018-11-011110.5070/R71141452https://escholarship.org/uc/item/31w7t9f3Linguistic Spatial Violence: The Muslim Cameleers in the Australian OutbackJoshua Nash0Aarhus Institute of Advanced Studies, Aarhus University<span id="docs-internal-guid-836c9fcb-7fff-de38-9b72-e07e3cc1a5c9"><p dir="ltr"><span>Architectural space can be both absent or present. Architectural absence in previously architected space represents a manifestation of violence and removal. Whether through human, temporal, or natural induction, the disappearance and elimination of architectural form reveals the role of process in creation–deconstruction of both the linguistic and the architectural. I pose linguistic space as the absence of the architectural. The Muslim cameleers in the Australian outback built and forged their architecture and spatial behaviour in the un(der)privileged foundations of what was for these camel drovers a foreign land. While most of their architecture is now gone, helped through apparently violent instruments of time and neglect, their linguistic spatiality protrudes unfadingly in the form of personal names and placenames (toponyms) embedded in the(ir) cultural landscapes-cum-archiscapes. In these remote and removed bivouacs, our subjects built with force and were driven to the edges of their towns to eke out their livelihood. They travelled far, spoke their languages, redistributed creole cants and architectural vernaculars, and used local means to devise their own miniature organisational vehemence (read: spatial violence through building). I use the methodology of (linguistic) spatial writing to link the presence of linguistic landscape ephemera in the namespace/namescape to the absent architectural traces of our amateur builder exemplars. This narrative should be of interest not only to scholars of architectural spatial writing but also linguists of minority languages, students of the linguistic landscape, and historians of violence in colonial localities.</span></p><div><span><br /></span></div></span>http://escholarship.org/uc/item/31w7t9f3Architectural pilgrimage, emotion, linguistic landscape, Muslims, spatial writing, toponyms
spellingShingle Joshua Nash
Linguistic Spatial Violence: The Muslim Cameleers in the Australian Outback
Refract
Architectural pilgrimage, emotion, linguistic landscape, Muslims, spatial writing, toponyms
title Linguistic Spatial Violence: The Muslim Cameleers in the Australian Outback
title_full Linguistic Spatial Violence: The Muslim Cameleers in the Australian Outback
title_fullStr Linguistic Spatial Violence: The Muslim Cameleers in the Australian Outback
title_full_unstemmed Linguistic Spatial Violence: The Muslim Cameleers in the Australian Outback
title_short Linguistic Spatial Violence: The Muslim Cameleers in the Australian Outback
title_sort linguistic spatial violence the muslim cameleers in the australian outback
topic Architectural pilgrimage, emotion, linguistic landscape, Muslims, spatial writing, toponyms
url http://escholarship.org/uc/item/31w7t9f3
work_keys_str_mv AT joshuanash linguisticspatialviolencethemuslimcameleersintheaustralianoutback