South Africa v Israel: A Solomonic Decision as “Constructive Ambiguity”

In its wise Order of 26 January 2024, the ICJ managed to make a virtue out of a necessity: Israel was not prohibited from continuing its combat operations but was reminded of its strict compliance with international humanitarian law and its obligation to avoid genocide. At the same time, the ICJ rei...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Peter Hilpold
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH 2024-01-01
Series:Verfassungsblog
Subjects:
Online Access:https://verfassungsblog.de/south-africa-v-israel-a-solomonic-decision-as-constructive-ambiguity/
_version_ 1797338147727605760
author Peter Hilpold
author_facet Peter Hilpold
author_sort Peter Hilpold
collection DOAJ
description In its wise Order of 26 January 2024, the ICJ managed to make a virtue out of a necessity: Israel was not prohibited from continuing its combat operations but was reminded of its strict compliance with international humanitarian law and its obligation to avoid genocide. At the same time, the ICJ reiterated the requirement to respect the most fundamental rights and the core of humanitarian law to all warring factions. Despite still essentially being a court for inter-state disputes – it put the individual, the human being, at the centre. Henceforth, the ICJ’s order of provisional measures is a Solomonic decision at its best and a further step towards the “humanization of international law”.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T09:26:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4aaa8c018a704ed2a42857866eed4a6a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2366-7044
language deu
last_indexed 2024-03-08T09:26:48Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH
record_format Article
series Verfassungsblog
spelling doaj.art-4aaa8c018a704ed2a42857866eed4a6a2024-01-31T08:29:50ZdeuMax Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbHVerfassungsblog2366-70442024-01-012366-704410.59704/19dad998883134b8South Africa v Israel: A Solomonic Decision as “Constructive Ambiguity”Peter Hilpoldhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9947-3972In its wise Order of 26 January 2024, the ICJ managed to make a virtue out of a necessity: Israel was not prohibited from continuing its combat operations but was reminded of its strict compliance with international humanitarian law and its obligation to avoid genocide. At the same time, the ICJ reiterated the requirement to respect the most fundamental rights and the core of humanitarian law to all warring factions. Despite still essentially being a court for inter-state disputes – it put the individual, the human being, at the centre. Henceforth, the ICJ’s order of provisional measures is a Solomonic decision at its best and a further step towards the “humanization of international law”.https://verfassungsblog.de/south-africa-v-israel-a-solomonic-decision-as-constructive-ambiguity/GenocideICJIsraelIsraelSouth AfricaStatute of the International Court of Justice | Vereinte Nationen
spellingShingle Peter Hilpold
South Africa v Israel: A Solomonic Decision as “Constructive Ambiguity”
Verfassungsblog
Genocide
ICJ
Israel
Israel
South Africa
Statute of the International Court of Justice | Vereinte Nationen
title South Africa v Israel: A Solomonic Decision as “Constructive Ambiguity”
title_full South Africa v Israel: A Solomonic Decision as “Constructive Ambiguity”
title_fullStr South Africa v Israel: A Solomonic Decision as “Constructive Ambiguity”
title_full_unstemmed South Africa v Israel: A Solomonic Decision as “Constructive Ambiguity”
title_short South Africa v Israel: A Solomonic Decision as “Constructive Ambiguity”
title_sort south africa v israel a solomonic decision as constructive ambiguity
topic Genocide
ICJ
Israel
Israel
South Africa
Statute of the International Court of Justice | Vereinte Nationen
url https://verfassungsblog.de/south-africa-v-israel-a-solomonic-decision-as-constructive-ambiguity/
work_keys_str_mv AT peterhilpold southafricavisraelasolomonicdecisionasconstructiveambiguity