Quantifying the quantitative (re-)turn in historical linguistics

Historical linguistics is the study of language change and stability, of the history of individual languages, and of the relatedness between languages. In spite of numerous acknowledgements, the adoption of quantitative methods in historical linguistics is still far from being mainstream and it fall...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Barbara McGillivray, Gard B. Jenset
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer Nature 2023-01-01
Series:Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01531-2
_version_ 1811171812714741760
author Barbara McGillivray
Gard B. Jenset
author_facet Barbara McGillivray
Gard B. Jenset
author_sort Barbara McGillivray
collection DOAJ
description Historical linguistics is the study of language change and stability, of the history of individual languages, and of the relatedness between languages. In spite of numerous acknowledgements, the adoption of quantitative methods in historical linguistics is still far from being mainstream and it falls below the level of other branches of linguistics. This comment considers the adoption of quantitative methods in recent historical linguistics research, and compares a study on 2012 publications with a similar study conducted seven years later. This comment argues for the advantages of a wider adoption of quantitative methods among historical linguists, and considers various reasons for the relatively slow progress in this direction. It also clarifies when quantitative methods are not the preferred route.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T17:20:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4aaad6a814f34e0eb1fb1f6562f56d93
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2662-9992
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T17:20:24Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Springer Nature
record_format Article
series Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
spelling doaj.art-4aaad6a814f34e0eb1fb1f6562f56d932023-02-05T12:07:05ZengSpringer NatureHumanities & Social Sciences Communications2662-99922023-01-011011610.1057/s41599-023-01531-2Quantifying the quantitative (re-)turn in historical linguisticsBarbara McGillivray0Gard B. Jenset1King’s College LondonSpringer NatureHistorical linguistics is the study of language change and stability, of the history of individual languages, and of the relatedness between languages. In spite of numerous acknowledgements, the adoption of quantitative methods in historical linguistics is still far from being mainstream and it falls below the level of other branches of linguistics. This comment considers the adoption of quantitative methods in recent historical linguistics research, and compares a study on 2012 publications with a similar study conducted seven years later. This comment argues for the advantages of a wider adoption of quantitative methods among historical linguists, and considers various reasons for the relatively slow progress in this direction. It also clarifies when quantitative methods are not the preferred route.https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01531-2
spellingShingle Barbara McGillivray
Gard B. Jenset
Quantifying the quantitative (re-)turn in historical linguistics
Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
title Quantifying the quantitative (re-)turn in historical linguistics
title_full Quantifying the quantitative (re-)turn in historical linguistics
title_fullStr Quantifying the quantitative (re-)turn in historical linguistics
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying the quantitative (re-)turn in historical linguistics
title_short Quantifying the quantitative (re-)turn in historical linguistics
title_sort quantifying the quantitative re turn in historical linguistics
url https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01531-2
work_keys_str_mv AT barbaramcgillivray quantifyingthequantitativereturninhistoricallinguistics
AT gardbjenset quantifyingthequantitativereturninhistoricallinguistics