Solar Energy Potential on Surfaces with Various Inclination Modes in Saudi Arabia: Performance of an Isotropic and an Anisotropic Model

The present work investigated the performance of an isotropic (Liu–Jordan, L–J) and an anisotropic (Hay) model in assessing the solar energy potential of Saudi Arabia. Three types of solar collectors were considered: with southward fixed-tilt (mode (i)), with fixed-tilt tracking the Sun (mode (ii)),...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ashraf Farahat, Harry D. Kambezidis, Mansour Almazroui, Emad Ramadan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-05-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/12/11/5356
_version_ 1797494241825390592
author Ashraf Farahat
Harry D. Kambezidis
Mansour Almazroui
Emad Ramadan
author_facet Ashraf Farahat
Harry D. Kambezidis
Mansour Almazroui
Emad Ramadan
author_sort Ashraf Farahat
collection DOAJ
description The present work investigated the performance of an isotropic (Liu–Jordan, L–J) and an anisotropic (Hay) model in assessing the solar energy potential of Saudi Arabia. Three types of solar collectors were considered: with southward fixed-tilt (mode (i)), with fixed-tilt tracking the Sun (mode (ii)), and with varying-tilt tracking the Sun (mode (iii)). This was the first time such a study was conducted for Saudi Arabia. The average annual difference between anisotropic (Hay) and isotropic (L–J) estimates is least ≈38 kWhm<sup>−2</sup> year<sup>−1</sup> over Saudi Arabia for mode (i), and therefore, the L–J model can be used effectively. In modes (ii) and (iii), the difference is greater (≈197 and ≈226 kWhm<sup>−2</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>, respectively). It is, then, up to the solar energy engineer to decide which model is to be used, but it is recommended that the Hay model be utilised for mode-(iii) solar collectors. These results fill a research gap about the suitability of models in practice. An interesting feature for the ratio of the annual mean solar energy yield of Hay over L–J as function of the latitude, φ, and the ground albedo, ρ<sub>r</sub>, is the formation of a “well” for 29° ≤ φ ≤ 31° and 1.15 ≤ ρ<sub>r</sub> ≤ 1.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T01:31:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4ab0492357dd4406af3ed4a518ae0f50
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-3417
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T01:31:32Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Applied Sciences
spelling doaj.art-4ab0492357dd4406af3ed4a518ae0f502023-11-23T13:40:17ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172022-05-011211535610.3390/app12115356Solar Energy Potential on Surfaces with Various Inclination Modes in Saudi Arabia: Performance of an Isotropic and an Anisotropic ModelAshraf Farahat0Harry D. Kambezidis1Mansour Almazroui2Emad Ramadan3Department of Physics, College of General Studies, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran SA-31261, Saudi ArabiaAtmospheric Research Team, Institute of Environmental Research and Sustainable Development, National Observatory of Athens, GR-11810 Athens, GreeceCentre of Excellence for Climate Change Research, Department of Meteorology, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah SA-21589, Saudi ArabiaCentre of Research Excellence in Renewable Energy, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran SA-31261, Saudi ArabiaThe present work investigated the performance of an isotropic (Liu–Jordan, L–J) and an anisotropic (Hay) model in assessing the solar energy potential of Saudi Arabia. Three types of solar collectors were considered: with southward fixed-tilt (mode (i)), with fixed-tilt tracking the Sun (mode (ii)), and with varying-tilt tracking the Sun (mode (iii)). This was the first time such a study was conducted for Saudi Arabia. The average annual difference between anisotropic (Hay) and isotropic (L–J) estimates is least ≈38 kWhm<sup>−2</sup> year<sup>−1</sup> over Saudi Arabia for mode (i), and therefore, the L–J model can be used effectively. In modes (ii) and (iii), the difference is greater (≈197 and ≈226 kWhm<sup>−2</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>, respectively). It is, then, up to the solar energy engineer to decide which model is to be used, but it is recommended that the Hay model be utilised for mode-(iii) solar collectors. These results fill a research gap about the suitability of models in practice. An interesting feature for the ratio of the annual mean solar energy yield of Hay over L–J as function of the latitude, φ, and the ground albedo, ρ<sub>r</sub>, is the formation of a “well” for 29° ≤ φ ≤ 31° and 1.15 ≤ ρ<sub>r</sub> ≤ 1.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/12/11/5356transposition modelsisotropic modelanisotropic modeloperation modes of solar collectorssolar energy potentialSaudi Arabia
spellingShingle Ashraf Farahat
Harry D. Kambezidis
Mansour Almazroui
Emad Ramadan
Solar Energy Potential on Surfaces with Various Inclination Modes in Saudi Arabia: Performance of an Isotropic and an Anisotropic Model
Applied Sciences
transposition models
isotropic model
anisotropic model
operation modes of solar collectors
solar energy potential
Saudi Arabia
title Solar Energy Potential on Surfaces with Various Inclination Modes in Saudi Arabia: Performance of an Isotropic and an Anisotropic Model
title_full Solar Energy Potential on Surfaces with Various Inclination Modes in Saudi Arabia: Performance of an Isotropic and an Anisotropic Model
title_fullStr Solar Energy Potential on Surfaces with Various Inclination Modes in Saudi Arabia: Performance of an Isotropic and an Anisotropic Model
title_full_unstemmed Solar Energy Potential on Surfaces with Various Inclination Modes in Saudi Arabia: Performance of an Isotropic and an Anisotropic Model
title_short Solar Energy Potential on Surfaces with Various Inclination Modes in Saudi Arabia: Performance of an Isotropic and an Anisotropic Model
title_sort solar energy potential on surfaces with various inclination modes in saudi arabia performance of an isotropic and an anisotropic model
topic transposition models
isotropic model
anisotropic model
operation modes of solar collectors
solar energy potential
Saudi Arabia
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/12/11/5356
work_keys_str_mv AT ashraffarahat solarenergypotentialonsurfaceswithvariousinclinationmodesinsaudiarabiaperformanceofanisotropicandananisotropicmodel
AT harrydkambezidis solarenergypotentialonsurfaceswithvariousinclinationmodesinsaudiarabiaperformanceofanisotropicandananisotropicmodel
AT mansouralmazroui solarenergypotentialonsurfaceswithvariousinclinationmodesinsaudiarabiaperformanceofanisotropicandananisotropicmodel
AT emadramadan solarenergypotentialonsurfaceswithvariousinclinationmodesinsaudiarabiaperformanceofanisotropicandananisotropicmodel