Forest Stand Size-Species Models Using Spatial Analyses of Remotely Sensed Data

Regression models to predict stand size classes (sawtimber and saplings) and categories of species (hardwood and softwood) from fractal dimensions (FD) and Moran’s I derived from Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) data were developed. Three study areas (Oakmulgee National Forest, Bankhead National Forest,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohammad Al-Hamdan, James Cruise, Douglas Rickman, Dale Quattrochi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2014-10-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/6/10/9802
_version_ 1818905327635005440
author Mohammad Al-Hamdan
James Cruise
Douglas Rickman
Dale Quattrochi
author_facet Mohammad Al-Hamdan
James Cruise
Douglas Rickman
Dale Quattrochi
author_sort Mohammad Al-Hamdan
collection DOAJ
description Regression models to predict stand size classes (sawtimber and saplings) and categories of species (hardwood and softwood) from fractal dimensions (FD) and Moran’s I derived from Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) data were developed. Three study areas (Oakmulgee National Forest, Bankhead National Forest, and Talladega National Forest) were randomly selected and used to develop the prediction models, while one study area, Chattahoochee National Forest, was saved for validation. This study has shown that these spatial analytical indices (FD and Moran’s I) can distinguish between different forest trunk size classes and different categories of species (hardwood and softwood) using Landsat TM data. The results of this study also revealed that there is a linear relationship between each one of the spatial indices and the percentages of sawtimber–saplings size classes and hardwood–softwood categories of species. Given the high number of factors causing errors in the remotely sensed data as well as the Forest Inventory Analysis (FIA) data sets and compared to other studies in the research literature, the sawtimber–saplings models and hardwood–softwood models were reasonable in terms of significance and the levels of explained variance for both spatial indices FD and Moran’s I. The mean absolute percentage errors associated with the stand size classes prediction models and categories of species prediction models that take topographical elevation into consideration ranged from 4.4% to 19.8% and from 12.1% to 18.9%, respectively, while the root mean square errors ranged from 10% to 14% and from 11% to 13%, respectively.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T21:21:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4ac6e57dce1448c29a8adce1c00d6e76
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-4292
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T21:21:34Z
publishDate 2014-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Remote Sensing
spelling doaj.art-4ac6e57dce1448c29a8adce1c00d6e762022-12-21T20:05:13ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922014-10-016109802982810.3390/rs6109802rs6109802Forest Stand Size-Species Models Using Spatial Analyses of Remotely Sensed DataMohammad Al-Hamdan0James Cruise1Douglas Rickman2Dale Quattrochi3Universities Space Research Association at NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, National Space Science and Technology Center, NASA Global Hydrology and Climate Center, Huntsville, AL 35805, USAEarth System Science Center, University of Alabama in Huntsville, National Space Science and Technology Center, Huntsville, AL 35805, USAEarth Science Office at NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, National Space Science and Technology Center, NASA Global Hydrology and Climate Center, Huntsville, AL 35805, USAEarth Science Office at NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, National Space Science and Technology Center, NASA Global Hydrology and Climate Center, Huntsville, AL 35805, USARegression models to predict stand size classes (sawtimber and saplings) and categories of species (hardwood and softwood) from fractal dimensions (FD) and Moran’s I derived from Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) data were developed. Three study areas (Oakmulgee National Forest, Bankhead National Forest, and Talladega National Forest) were randomly selected and used to develop the prediction models, while one study area, Chattahoochee National Forest, was saved for validation. This study has shown that these spatial analytical indices (FD and Moran’s I) can distinguish between different forest trunk size classes and different categories of species (hardwood and softwood) using Landsat TM data. The results of this study also revealed that there is a linear relationship between each one of the spatial indices and the percentages of sawtimber–saplings size classes and hardwood–softwood categories of species. Given the high number of factors causing errors in the remotely sensed data as well as the Forest Inventory Analysis (FIA) data sets and compared to other studies in the research literature, the sawtimber–saplings models and hardwood–softwood models were reasonable in terms of significance and the levels of explained variance for both spatial indices FD and Moran’s I. The mean absolute percentage errors associated with the stand size classes prediction models and categories of species prediction models that take topographical elevation into consideration ranged from 4.4% to 19.8% and from 12.1% to 18.9%, respectively, while the root mean square errors ranged from 10% to 14% and from 11% to 13%, respectively.http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/6/10/9802remote sensingfractal dimensionsMoran’s Iforested landscapessize-species models
spellingShingle Mohammad Al-Hamdan
James Cruise
Douglas Rickman
Dale Quattrochi
Forest Stand Size-Species Models Using Spatial Analyses of Remotely Sensed Data
Remote Sensing
remote sensing
fractal dimensions
Moran’s I
forested landscapes
size-species models
title Forest Stand Size-Species Models Using Spatial Analyses of Remotely Sensed Data
title_full Forest Stand Size-Species Models Using Spatial Analyses of Remotely Sensed Data
title_fullStr Forest Stand Size-Species Models Using Spatial Analyses of Remotely Sensed Data
title_full_unstemmed Forest Stand Size-Species Models Using Spatial Analyses of Remotely Sensed Data
title_short Forest Stand Size-Species Models Using Spatial Analyses of Remotely Sensed Data
title_sort forest stand size species models using spatial analyses of remotely sensed data
topic remote sensing
fractal dimensions
Moran’s I
forested landscapes
size-species models
url http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/6/10/9802
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadalhamdan foreststandsizespeciesmodelsusingspatialanalysesofremotelysenseddata
AT jamescruise foreststandsizespeciesmodelsusingspatialanalysesofremotelysenseddata
AT douglasrickman foreststandsizespeciesmodelsusingspatialanalysesofremotelysenseddata
AT dalequattrochi foreststandsizespeciesmodelsusingspatialanalysesofremotelysenseddata