Rope-Hook Recovery Controller Designed for a Flying-Wing UAV

Due to the complexity of landing environments, precision guidance and high-precision control technology have become key to the rope-hook recovery of shipborne unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). The recovery process was divided into three stages and a reasonable guidance strategy had been designed for...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhao Deng, Fuqiang Bing, Zhiming Guo, Liaoni Wu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-12-01
Series:Aerospace
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4310/8/12/384
_version_ 1797507067728101376
author Zhao Deng
Fuqiang Bing
Zhiming Guo
Liaoni Wu
author_facet Zhao Deng
Fuqiang Bing
Zhiming Guo
Liaoni Wu
author_sort Zhao Deng
collection DOAJ
description Due to the complexity of landing environments, precision guidance and high-precision control technology have become key to the rope-hook recovery of shipborne unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). The recovery process was divided into three stages and a reasonable guidance strategy had been designed for them, respectively. This study separated the guidance and control issues into an outer guidance loop and an inner control loop. The inner loop (attitude control loop) controled the UAV to follow the acceleration commands generated by the outer loop (trajectory tracking loop). The inner loop of the longitudinal controller and the lateral controller were designed based on active disturbance rejection control (ADRC), which has strong anti-interference ability. In the last phase, the outer loop of the longitudinal controller switched from a total energy control system (TECS), which greatly decoupled the altitude channel and speed channel, to the proportional navigation (PN) guidance law, while the outer loop of lateral controller switches from the proportional control law based on the L<sub>1</sub> guidance law, which can reduce the tracking error and deviation, to the PN guidance law, which considerably enhances the tracking precision. Finally, the simulation data and flight test data show that the controller has strong robustness and good tracking precision, which ensures safe rope-hook recovery.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T04:41:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4ac9e838fff147e7a38fe7337fd47627
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2226-4310
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T04:41:23Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Aerospace
spelling doaj.art-4ac9e838fff147e7a38fe7337fd476272023-11-23T03:18:13ZengMDPI AGAerospace2226-43102021-12-0181238410.3390/aerospace8120384Rope-Hook Recovery Controller Designed for a Flying-Wing UAVZhao Deng0Fuqiang Bing1Zhiming Guo2Liaoni Wu3School of Aerospace Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361000, ChinaSchool of Aerospace Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361000, ChinaSchool of Aerospace Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361000, ChinaSchool of Aerospace Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361000, ChinaDue to the complexity of landing environments, precision guidance and high-precision control technology have become key to the rope-hook recovery of shipborne unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). The recovery process was divided into three stages and a reasonable guidance strategy had been designed for them, respectively. This study separated the guidance and control issues into an outer guidance loop and an inner control loop. The inner loop (attitude control loop) controled the UAV to follow the acceleration commands generated by the outer loop (trajectory tracking loop). The inner loop of the longitudinal controller and the lateral controller were designed based on active disturbance rejection control (ADRC), which has strong anti-interference ability. In the last phase, the outer loop of the longitudinal controller switched from a total energy control system (TECS), which greatly decoupled the altitude channel and speed channel, to the proportional navigation (PN) guidance law, while the outer loop of lateral controller switches from the proportional control law based on the L<sub>1</sub> guidance law, which can reduce the tracking error and deviation, to the PN guidance law, which considerably enhances the tracking precision. Finally, the simulation data and flight test data show that the controller has strong robustness and good tracking precision, which ensures safe rope-hook recovery.https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4310/8/12/384rope-hook recoveryTECSADRCtrajectory trackingL1 guidanceproportional navigation
spellingShingle Zhao Deng
Fuqiang Bing
Zhiming Guo
Liaoni Wu
Rope-Hook Recovery Controller Designed for a Flying-Wing UAV
Aerospace
rope-hook recovery
TECS
ADRC
trajectory tracking
L1 guidance
proportional navigation
title Rope-Hook Recovery Controller Designed for a Flying-Wing UAV
title_full Rope-Hook Recovery Controller Designed for a Flying-Wing UAV
title_fullStr Rope-Hook Recovery Controller Designed for a Flying-Wing UAV
title_full_unstemmed Rope-Hook Recovery Controller Designed for a Flying-Wing UAV
title_short Rope-Hook Recovery Controller Designed for a Flying-Wing UAV
title_sort rope hook recovery controller designed for a flying wing uav
topic rope-hook recovery
TECS
ADRC
trajectory tracking
L1 guidance
proportional navigation
url https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4310/8/12/384
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaodeng ropehookrecoverycontrollerdesignedforaflyingwinguav
AT fuqiangbing ropehookrecoverycontrollerdesignedforaflyingwinguav
AT zhimingguo ropehookrecoverycontrollerdesignedforaflyingwinguav
AT liaoniwu ropehookrecoverycontrollerdesignedforaflyingwinguav