Specific Features Of Geological Risk Assessment In Moscow

The paper describes approaches to assessing geohazards and georisk of economic losses in Moscow. It is shown that for surface construction, the principle geohazards in Moscow are karst-suffosion sinkholes, land subsidence, landslides, and waterlogging. The subsurface construction is endangered by ka...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Irina V. Kozliakova, Olga N. Eremina, Nadezhda G. Anisimova, Irina A. Kozhevnikova
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Lomonosov Moscow State University 2019-12-01
Series:Geography, Environment, Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ges.rgo.ru/jour/article/view/911
_version_ 1797878427233026048
author Irina V. Kozliakova
Olga N. Eremina
Nadezhda G. Anisimova
Irina A. Kozhevnikova
author_facet Irina V. Kozliakova
Olga N. Eremina
Nadezhda G. Anisimova
Irina A. Kozhevnikova
author_sort Irina V. Kozliakova
collection DOAJ
description The paper describes approaches to assessing geohazards and georisk of economic losses in Moscow. It is shown that for surface construction, the principle geohazards in Moscow are karst-suffosion sinkholes, land subsidence, landslides, and waterlogging. The subsurface construction is endangered by karstification and fracturing of limestone, decompaction, and swelling of clay, quicksand phenomena, and groundwater breakthrough to tunnels. The different procedures for the assessment of geological risk in Moscow have been suggested for already existing urban infrastructure and for future planned construction. For existing surface urban infrastructure, geological risk is considered to be an integral parameter of probable damage caused by geohazards and the anthropogenic load on the specific territories. The main aim of risk mapping in this case is outlining the territories, for which restrictions and prohibitions should be imposed for further urban engineering development. For future subsurface urban construction, the risk-analysis consists in assessing the impact of geohazards on the engineering structure by comparing the future expenditures for the construction and operation under different engineering geological conditions. The procedures of risk mapping elaborated for both approaches are described; the typification schemes are listed; and the relevant risk maps built for the Moscow territory are provided. The risk maps will help planners to compare and make alternative project decisions in order to minimize the cost in future economic expenditures. Both approaches are successfully approved in Moscow.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T02:32:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4aca4354e05a45e4a784bb0595983af7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2071-9388
2542-1565
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T02:32:22Z
publishDate 2019-12-01
publisher Lomonosov Moscow State University
record_format Article
series Geography, Environment, Sustainability
spelling doaj.art-4aca4354e05a45e4a784bb0595983af72023-03-13T07:52:33ZengLomonosov Moscow State UniversityGeography, Environment, Sustainability2071-93882542-15652019-12-0112415917410.24057/2071-9388-2019-85427Specific Features Of Geological Risk Assessment In MoscowIrina V. Kozliakova0Olga N. Eremina1Nadezhda G. Anisimova2Irina A. Kozhevnikova3Sergeev Institute of Environmental Geoscience, Russian Academy of Sciences (IEG RAS)Sergeev Institute of Environmental Geoscience, Russian Academy of Sciences (IEG RAS)Sergeev Institute of Environmental Geoscience, Russian Academy of Sciences (IEG RAS)Sergeev Institute of Environmental Geoscience, Russian Academy of Sciences (IEG RAS)The paper describes approaches to assessing geohazards and georisk of economic losses in Moscow. It is shown that for surface construction, the principle geohazards in Moscow are karst-suffosion sinkholes, land subsidence, landslides, and waterlogging. The subsurface construction is endangered by karstification and fracturing of limestone, decompaction, and swelling of clay, quicksand phenomena, and groundwater breakthrough to tunnels. The different procedures for the assessment of geological risk in Moscow have been suggested for already existing urban infrastructure and for future planned construction. For existing surface urban infrastructure, geological risk is considered to be an integral parameter of probable damage caused by geohazards and the anthropogenic load on the specific territories. The main aim of risk mapping in this case is outlining the territories, for which restrictions and prohibitions should be imposed for further urban engineering development. For future subsurface urban construction, the risk-analysis consists in assessing the impact of geohazards on the engineering structure by comparing the future expenditures for the construction and operation under different engineering geological conditions. The procedures of risk mapping elaborated for both approaches are described; the typification schemes are listed; and the relevant risk maps built for the Moscow territory are provided. The risk maps will help planners to compare and make alternative project decisions in order to minimize the cost in future economic expenditures. Both approaches are successfully approved in Moscow.https://ges.rgo.ru/jour/article/view/911exogenous geohazardsrisk analysisurban areasmappingurban environment vulnerability
spellingShingle Irina V. Kozliakova
Olga N. Eremina
Nadezhda G. Anisimova
Irina A. Kozhevnikova
Specific Features Of Geological Risk Assessment In Moscow
Geography, Environment, Sustainability
exogenous geohazards
risk analysis
urban areas
mapping
urban environment vulnerability
title Specific Features Of Geological Risk Assessment In Moscow
title_full Specific Features Of Geological Risk Assessment In Moscow
title_fullStr Specific Features Of Geological Risk Assessment In Moscow
title_full_unstemmed Specific Features Of Geological Risk Assessment In Moscow
title_short Specific Features Of Geological Risk Assessment In Moscow
title_sort specific features of geological risk assessment in moscow
topic exogenous geohazards
risk analysis
urban areas
mapping
urban environment vulnerability
url https://ges.rgo.ru/jour/article/view/911
work_keys_str_mv AT irinavkozliakova specificfeaturesofgeologicalriskassessmentinmoscow
AT olganeremina specificfeaturesofgeologicalriskassessmentinmoscow
AT nadezhdaganisimova specificfeaturesofgeologicalriskassessmentinmoscow
AT irinaakozhevnikova specificfeaturesofgeologicalriskassessmentinmoscow