Successful pilot application of multi-attribute utility analysis concepts in evaluating academic-clinical partnerships in the United States: a case report
Strong partnerships between academic health professions programs and clinical practice settings, termed academic-clinical partnerships, are essential in providing quality clinical training experiences. However, the literature does not operationalize a model by which an academic program may identify...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute
2022-08-01
|
Series: | Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.jeehp.org/upload/jeehp-19-18.pdf |
_version_ | 1797787250161876992 |
---|---|
author | Sara Elizabeth North Amanda Nicole Sharp |
author_facet | Sara Elizabeth North Amanda Nicole Sharp |
author_sort | Sara Elizabeth North |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Strong partnerships between academic health professions programs and clinical practice settings, termed academic-clinical partnerships, are essential in providing quality clinical training experiences. However, the literature does not operationalize a model by which an academic program may identify priority attributes and evaluate its partnerships. This study aimed to develop a values-based academic-clinical partnership evaluation approach, rooted in methodologies from the field of evaluation and implemented in the context of an academic Doctor of Physical Therapy clinical education program. The authors developed a semi-quantitative evaluation approach incorporating concepts from multi-attribute utility analysis (MAUA) that enabled consistent, values-based partnership evaluation. Data-informed actions led to improved overall partnership effectiveness. Pilot outcomes support the feasibility and desirability of moving toward MAUA as a potential methodological framework. Further research may lead to the development of a standardized process for any academic health profession program to perform a values-based evaluation of their academic-clinical partnerships to guide decision-making. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-13T01:20:13Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-4ace74dcdfb04cb08a21ffe73973a675 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1975-5937 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-13T01:20:13Z |
publishDate | 2022-08-01 |
publisher | Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions |
spelling | doaj.art-4ace74dcdfb04cb08a21ffe73973a6752023-07-05T04:44:27ZengKorea Health Personnel Licensing Examination InstituteJournal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions1975-59372022-08-011910.3352/jeehp.2022.19.18443Successful pilot application of multi-attribute utility analysis concepts in evaluating academic-clinical partnerships in the United States: a case reportSara Elizabeth NorthAmanda Nicole SharpStrong partnerships between academic health professions programs and clinical practice settings, termed academic-clinical partnerships, are essential in providing quality clinical training experiences. However, the literature does not operationalize a model by which an academic program may identify priority attributes and evaluate its partnerships. This study aimed to develop a values-based academic-clinical partnership evaluation approach, rooted in methodologies from the field of evaluation and implemented in the context of an academic Doctor of Physical Therapy clinical education program. The authors developed a semi-quantitative evaluation approach incorporating concepts from multi-attribute utility analysis (MAUA) that enabled consistent, values-based partnership evaluation. Data-informed actions led to improved overall partnership effectiveness. Pilot outcomes support the feasibility and desirability of moving toward MAUA as a potential methodological framework. Further research may lead to the development of a standardized process for any academic health profession program to perform a values-based evaluation of their academic-clinical partnerships to guide decision-making.http://www.jeehp.org/upload/jeehp-19-18.pdffeasibility studieshealth occupationspartnershipevaluationphysical therapycase report |
spellingShingle | Sara Elizabeth North Amanda Nicole Sharp Successful pilot application of multi-attribute utility analysis concepts in evaluating academic-clinical partnerships in the United States: a case report Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions feasibility studies health occupations partnership evaluation physical therapy case report |
title | Successful pilot application of multi-attribute utility analysis concepts in evaluating academic-clinical partnerships in the United States: a case report |
title_full | Successful pilot application of multi-attribute utility analysis concepts in evaluating academic-clinical partnerships in the United States: a case report |
title_fullStr | Successful pilot application of multi-attribute utility analysis concepts in evaluating academic-clinical partnerships in the United States: a case report |
title_full_unstemmed | Successful pilot application of multi-attribute utility analysis concepts in evaluating academic-clinical partnerships in the United States: a case report |
title_short | Successful pilot application of multi-attribute utility analysis concepts in evaluating academic-clinical partnerships in the United States: a case report |
title_sort | successful pilot application of multi attribute utility analysis concepts in evaluating academic clinical partnerships in the united states a case report |
topic | feasibility studies health occupations partnership evaluation physical therapy case report |
url | http://www.jeehp.org/upload/jeehp-19-18.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saraelizabethnorth successfulpilotapplicationofmultiattributeutilityanalysisconceptsinevaluatingacademicclinicalpartnershipsintheunitedstatesacasereport AT amandanicolesharp successfulpilotapplicationofmultiattributeutilityanalysisconceptsinevaluatingacademicclinicalpartnershipsintheunitedstatesacasereport |