Orhan Pamuk’s İstabul Carved in His Memory as a Source of Melancholy
The focus of the article is the construction of the city image in Orhan Pamuk’s memory. The essence of the image of İstanbul in İstanbul Memories and the City appears to be a profound sense of melancholy, which gives way to an equally deep sense of happiness that, Pamuk opines, few other cities c...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cyprus International University
2018-08-01
|
Series: | Folklor/Edebiyat |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.folkloredebiyat.org/Makaleler/605526000_12-O.Pamuk%20melankoli.pdf |
_version_ | 1811324056335548416 |
---|---|
author | Kuğu Tekin |
author_facet | Kuğu Tekin |
author_sort | Kuğu Tekin |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The focus of the article is the construction of the city image in Orhan Pamuk’s
memory. The essence of the image of İstanbul in İstanbul Memories and the
City appears to be a profound sense of melancholy, which gives way to an
equally deep sense of happiness that, Pamuk opines, few other cities could
possess. The article then investigates Pamuk’s sources of inspiration in creating
İstanbul’s image which is loaded with melancholy. It is obvious that Pamuk’s
memories concerning İstanbul have been mainly but not exclusively- shaped
by four poets\writers to whom the author sincere expresses his gratitude in
the work. The first two are the Turkish authors, Yahya Kemal Beyatlı and
Ahmet Hamdi Tanpınar, who themselves had been influenced by the other
two, Gerard de Nerval and Theophile Gautier. Gautier’s travel writings,
which he later published under the title of Constantinople had a considerable
impact on Yahya Kemal Beyatlı and Ahmet Hamdi Tanpınar, both of whom
developed a different and indigenous İstanbul image for its inhabitants. What
makes this city image different and original is the combination of the beautiful with the bizarre, the miserable and the sordid which brings about a sense
of prevailing melancholy rising over the ruins of a collapsed empire. While
following the footsteps of his literary predecessors, Pamuk also renders an
early autobiography which is interwoven into the cultural, socio-political, and
environmental, changes that took place in Istanbul in the twentieth century.
The theoretical framework of the article is based on the views of Freud,
Kristeva, and Peter Schwenger. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-13T14:07:25Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-4ad49c5a51b840f88c0eb4f5f50c9b5f |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1300-7491 1300-7491 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-13T14:07:25Z |
publishDate | 2018-08-01 |
publisher | Cyprus International University |
record_format | Article |
series | Folklor/Edebiyat |
spelling | doaj.art-4ad49c5a51b840f88c0eb4f5f50c9b5f2022-12-22T02:43:52ZengCyprus International UniversityFolklor/Edebiyat1300-74911300-74912018-08-01249520321210.22559/folklor.194Orhan Pamuk’s İstabul Carved in His Memory as a Source of MelancholyKuğu TekinThe focus of the article is the construction of the city image in Orhan Pamuk’s memory. The essence of the image of İstanbul in İstanbul Memories and the City appears to be a profound sense of melancholy, which gives way to an equally deep sense of happiness that, Pamuk opines, few other cities could possess. The article then investigates Pamuk’s sources of inspiration in creating İstanbul’s image which is loaded with melancholy. It is obvious that Pamuk’s memories concerning İstanbul have been mainly but not exclusively- shaped by four poets\writers to whom the author sincere expresses his gratitude in the work. The first two are the Turkish authors, Yahya Kemal Beyatlı and Ahmet Hamdi Tanpınar, who themselves had been influenced by the other two, Gerard de Nerval and Theophile Gautier. Gautier’s travel writings, which he later published under the title of Constantinople had a considerable impact on Yahya Kemal Beyatlı and Ahmet Hamdi Tanpınar, both of whom developed a different and indigenous İstanbul image for its inhabitants. What makes this city image different and original is the combination of the beautiful with the bizarre, the miserable and the sordid which brings about a sense of prevailing melancholy rising over the ruins of a collapsed empire. While following the footsteps of his literary predecessors, Pamuk also renders an early autobiography which is interwoven into the cultural, socio-political, and environmental, changes that took place in Istanbul in the twentieth century. The theoretical framework of the article is based on the views of Freud, Kristeva, and Peter Schwenger.http://www.folkloredebiyat.org/Makaleler/605526000_12-O.Pamuk%20melankoli.pdfOrhan PamukIstanbulthe citymemorymelancholy |
spellingShingle | Kuğu Tekin Orhan Pamuk’s İstabul Carved in His Memory as a Source of Melancholy Folklor/Edebiyat Orhan Pamuk Istanbul the city memory melancholy |
title | Orhan Pamuk’s İstabul Carved in His Memory as a Source of Melancholy |
title_full | Orhan Pamuk’s İstabul Carved in His Memory as a Source of Melancholy |
title_fullStr | Orhan Pamuk’s İstabul Carved in His Memory as a Source of Melancholy |
title_full_unstemmed | Orhan Pamuk’s İstabul Carved in His Memory as a Source of Melancholy |
title_short | Orhan Pamuk’s İstabul Carved in His Memory as a Source of Melancholy |
title_sort | orhan pamuk s istabul carved in his memory as a source of melancholy |
topic | Orhan Pamuk Istanbul the city memory melancholy |
url | http://www.folkloredebiyat.org/Makaleler/605526000_12-O.Pamuk%20melankoli.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kugutekin orhanpamuksistabulcarvedinhismemoryasasourceofmelancholy |