Global power configuration after the war in Kosovo and Metohia
The war in Kosovo and Metohia was the result of a decade long tensions between ethnic Serbs and Albanians. It was led from the air in order to avoid more potential victims in case of land invasion. The end of war was the result of mutual concessions: from NATO side and the Serbian one. The sovereign...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Institute of Serbian Culture Priština, Leposavić
2013-01-01
|
| Series: | Baština |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0353-9008/2013/0353-90081335347S.pdf |
| _version_ | 1819093857445347328 |
|---|---|
| author | Slović Srđan |
| author_facet | Slović Srđan |
| author_sort | Slović Srđan |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The war in Kosovo and Metohia was the result of a decade long tensions between ethnic Serbs and Albanians. It was led from the air in order to avoid more potential victims in case of land invasion. The end of war was the result of mutual concessions: from NATO side and the Serbian one. The sovereignty of FRY was not put into question, but a great autonomy of Kosovo was predicted including the possibility of independence acquisition (secession). The Resolution 1244 was not abolished, but it was being derogated in order to prepare the fundament of Kosovo independence. Serbian military-security forces were withdrawn from the territory of Kosovo and Metohia. NATO intervention was not legal from the point of view of international law, but it subordinated sovereignty to human rights. Intervention was justified in cases of humanitarian need. Event though humanitarian need (catastrophe) is taken as the basis for the intervention, the example of such kind could not be found in the past. So, Kosovo cases were qualified as sui generis one. Thus, the war in Kosovo became an example to be followed in the future, and an unresolved situation may become the threat to the peace and security in the surrounding countries. Democratic countries give themselves the right to interfere and intervene into internal affairs of others differently from the autocratic ones, which was supposed to be neither correct nor consistent. Kosovo conflict and war rattled global power structure, especially with China and Russia as new challengers of the USA power. Both countries are trying hard to reach USA, but they are still in transition with unstable financial systems, migrations and unresolved system of social protection. Regarding Kosovo conflict and war, they engaged themselves rather indirectly than directly. As Security Council permanent members they were voting against the independence of Kosovo, but did not involve themselves into the war directly. Kosovo war showed how China is backward regarding war technique, and Russia regarding financial engagement. In addition, China expected membership in WTO, and Russia a great financial assistance. Russia engaged in negotiations via the Contact Group. With the arrival of Putin, Russia could not engage in Balkan more militarily but only commercially due to the fact most Balkan countries entered NATO or Partnership for Peace Programme. Internal cohesion of Russia with centralistic governance was reinforced, and ethnic tensions were calmed down. The perspective of Russia is United Nations and commerce through pipeline. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-21T23:18:10Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-4ae4f87e939c4ca1913beb328de5b1d4 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0353-9008 2683-5797 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-21T23:18:10Z |
| publishDate | 2013-01-01 |
| publisher | Institute of Serbian Culture Priština, Leposavić |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Baština |
| spelling | doaj.art-4ae4f87e939c4ca1913beb328de5b1d42022-12-21T18:46:51ZengInstitute of Serbian Culture Priština, LeposavićBaština0353-90082683-57972013-01-012013353473600353-90081335347SGlobal power configuration after the war in Kosovo and MetohiaSlović Srđan0Institut za srpsku kulturu Priština/LeposavićThe war in Kosovo and Metohia was the result of a decade long tensions between ethnic Serbs and Albanians. It was led from the air in order to avoid more potential victims in case of land invasion. The end of war was the result of mutual concessions: from NATO side and the Serbian one. The sovereignty of FRY was not put into question, but a great autonomy of Kosovo was predicted including the possibility of independence acquisition (secession). The Resolution 1244 was not abolished, but it was being derogated in order to prepare the fundament of Kosovo independence. Serbian military-security forces were withdrawn from the territory of Kosovo and Metohia. NATO intervention was not legal from the point of view of international law, but it subordinated sovereignty to human rights. Intervention was justified in cases of humanitarian need. Event though humanitarian need (catastrophe) is taken as the basis for the intervention, the example of such kind could not be found in the past. So, Kosovo cases were qualified as sui generis one. Thus, the war in Kosovo became an example to be followed in the future, and an unresolved situation may become the threat to the peace and security in the surrounding countries. Democratic countries give themselves the right to interfere and intervene into internal affairs of others differently from the autocratic ones, which was supposed to be neither correct nor consistent. Kosovo conflict and war rattled global power structure, especially with China and Russia as new challengers of the USA power. Both countries are trying hard to reach USA, but they are still in transition with unstable financial systems, migrations and unresolved system of social protection. Regarding Kosovo conflict and war, they engaged themselves rather indirectly than directly. As Security Council permanent members they were voting against the independence of Kosovo, but did not involve themselves into the war directly. Kosovo war showed how China is backward regarding war technique, and Russia regarding financial engagement. In addition, China expected membership in WTO, and Russia a great financial assistance. Russia engaged in negotiations via the Contact Group. With the arrival of Putin, Russia could not engage in Balkan more militarily but only commercially due to the fact most Balkan countries entered NATO or Partnership for Peace Programme. Internal cohesion of Russia with centralistic governance was reinforced, and ethnic tensions were calmed down. The perspective of Russia is United Nations and commerce through pipeline.https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0353-9008/2013/0353-90081335347S.pdfkosovo and metohiawarconflictgreat powersinternational communityunited nationshuman rightsbalkan peninsula |
| spellingShingle | Slović Srđan Global power configuration after the war in Kosovo and Metohia Baština kosovo and metohia war conflict great powers international community united nations human rights balkan peninsula |
| title | Global power configuration after the war in Kosovo and Metohia |
| title_full | Global power configuration after the war in Kosovo and Metohia |
| title_fullStr | Global power configuration after the war in Kosovo and Metohia |
| title_full_unstemmed | Global power configuration after the war in Kosovo and Metohia |
| title_short | Global power configuration after the war in Kosovo and Metohia |
| title_sort | global power configuration after the war in kosovo and metohia |
| topic | kosovo and metohia war conflict great powers international community united nations human rights balkan peninsula |
| url | https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0353-9008/2013/0353-90081335347S.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT slovicsrđan globalpowerconfigurationafterthewarinkosovoandmetohia |