Initial Experience With Video-Assisted Anal Fistula Treatment in the Philippines

Purpose We determined the outcomes of patients undergoing video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) for fistulain-ano at the Philippine General Hospital. Methods Twenty consecutive adult patients who underwent the VAAFT procedure from 2016–2018 were included in this investigation. Information de...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marc Paul J. Lopez, Mark Augustine S. Onglao, Hermogenes J. Monroy III
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Society of Coloproctology 2020-04-01
Series:Annals of Coloproctology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://coloproctol.org/upload/pdf/ac-2020-02-28.pdf
_version_ 1818688809967026176
author Marc Paul J. Lopez
Mark Augustine S. Onglao
Hermogenes J. Monroy III
author_facet Marc Paul J. Lopez
Mark Augustine S. Onglao
Hermogenes J. Monroy III
author_sort Marc Paul J. Lopez
collection DOAJ
description Purpose We determined the outcomes of patients undergoing video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) for fistulain-ano at the Philippine General Hospital. Methods Twenty consecutive adult patients who underwent the VAAFT procedure from 2016–2018 were included in this investigation. Information detailing baseline demographic and clinical data, fistula type and classification, and previous surgeries were retrieved from in-hospital and operative records. Operative time, identification of the internal opening, method of internal opening closure, and occurrence of immediate postoperative complications were determined. The status of the fistula was assessed at one month, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively based on outpatient follow-up records. The primary outcomes were healing rate and recurrence rate. Secondary outcomes were 30-day morbidity, postoperative complications, and incontinence using the Wexner score. Results Eighteen patients (90%) had a preoperative diagnosis of complex fistula, and 13 patients (65%) had undergone a previous fistula surgery. Primary healing rate was 55% at 1 month, 63.16% at 3 months, and 78.95% at 6 months postoperatively. Eighteen patients (94.74%) maintained continence (Wexner score = 0) at 6 months. Conclusion Our study results suggest that VAAFT is a safe, minimally invasive technique for treatment of anal fistula and can preserve anal sphincter function. The technique has an acceptable healing rate with minimal complications.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T12:00:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4ae82696faa145b29316719b706bef64
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2287-9714
2287-9722
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T12:00:07Z
publishDate 2020-04-01
publisher Korean Society of Coloproctology
record_format Article
series Annals of Coloproctology
spelling doaj.art-4ae82696faa145b29316719b706bef642022-12-21T21:49:52ZengKorean Society of ColoproctologyAnnals of Coloproctology2287-97142287-97222020-04-0136211211810.3393/ac.2020.02.281704Initial Experience With Video-Assisted Anal Fistula Treatment in the PhilippinesMarc Paul J. Lopez0Mark Augustine S. OnglaoHermogenes J. Monroy III1 Division of Colorectal Surgery, Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, the Philippines Division of Colorectal Surgery, Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, the PhilippinesPurpose We determined the outcomes of patients undergoing video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) for fistulain-ano at the Philippine General Hospital. Methods Twenty consecutive adult patients who underwent the VAAFT procedure from 2016–2018 were included in this investigation. Information detailing baseline demographic and clinical data, fistula type and classification, and previous surgeries were retrieved from in-hospital and operative records. Operative time, identification of the internal opening, method of internal opening closure, and occurrence of immediate postoperative complications were determined. The status of the fistula was assessed at one month, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively based on outpatient follow-up records. The primary outcomes were healing rate and recurrence rate. Secondary outcomes were 30-day morbidity, postoperative complications, and incontinence using the Wexner score. Results Eighteen patients (90%) had a preoperative diagnosis of complex fistula, and 13 patients (65%) had undergone a previous fistula surgery. Primary healing rate was 55% at 1 month, 63.16% at 3 months, and 78.95% at 6 months postoperatively. Eighteen patients (94.74%) maintained continence (Wexner score = 0) at 6 months. Conclusion Our study results suggest that VAAFT is a safe, minimally invasive technique for treatment of anal fistula and can preserve anal sphincter function. The technique has an acceptable healing rate with minimal complications.http://coloproctol.org/upload/pdf/ac-2020-02-28.pdffistulaanalanorectal
spellingShingle Marc Paul J. Lopez
Mark Augustine S. Onglao
Hermogenes J. Monroy III
Initial Experience With Video-Assisted Anal Fistula Treatment in the Philippines
Annals of Coloproctology
fistula
anal
anorectal
title Initial Experience With Video-Assisted Anal Fistula Treatment in the Philippines
title_full Initial Experience With Video-Assisted Anal Fistula Treatment in the Philippines
title_fullStr Initial Experience With Video-Assisted Anal Fistula Treatment in the Philippines
title_full_unstemmed Initial Experience With Video-Assisted Anal Fistula Treatment in the Philippines
title_short Initial Experience With Video-Assisted Anal Fistula Treatment in the Philippines
title_sort initial experience with video assisted anal fistula treatment in the philippines
topic fistula
anal
anorectal
url http://coloproctol.org/upload/pdf/ac-2020-02-28.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT marcpauljlopez initialexperiencewithvideoassistedanalfistulatreatmentinthephilippines
AT markaugustinesonglao initialexperiencewithvideoassistedanalfistulatreatmentinthephilippines
AT hermogenesjmonroyiii initialexperiencewithvideoassistedanalfistulatreatmentinthephilippines