Efficacy of spaced learning in adaptation of optokinetic response
Abstract Introduction The superiority of spaced training, in which repeated training sessions are given with resting intervals, over massed training in learning efficacy has been well established. However, longer duration of total training time has been required for spaced training than massed train...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2021-01-01
|
| Series: | Brain and Behavior |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1944 |
| _version_ | 1818588254531747840 |
|---|---|
| author | Ngoc Chien Pham Yong Gyu Kim Sang Jeong Kim Chang‐Hee Kim |
| author_facet | Ngoc Chien Pham Yong Gyu Kim Sang Jeong Kim Chang‐Hee Kim |
| author_sort | Ngoc Chien Pham |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Introduction The superiority of spaced training, in which repeated training sessions are given with resting intervals, over massed training in learning efficacy has been well established. However, longer duration of total training time has been required for spaced training than massed training because spacing intervals intervene between training sessions in spaced training. Thus, the learning efficacy may not be simply compared between spaced and massed training in terms of “time efficiency.” The aim of the present study was to investigate the efficacy of spaced and massed training using adaptation of horizontal optokinetic reflex (hOKR) in mice. Methods Training paradigms were categorized into seven groups according to the duration of spacing interval, keeping total duration of hOKR training including spacing almost equal in all training paradigms. Results The amount of short‐term hOKR gain increase immediately after the 60 min hOKR training was not significantly different among seven training paradigms. The hOKR adaptation was still in progress during a spacing interval, and the increment in hOKR gain tended to be greater with the longer spacing interval. The increase in hOKR gain was maintained until 48 hr after the end of training in both massed and spaced training. Conclusion The short‐term learning effect was not significantly different among training paradigms regardless of spacing interval in hOKR adaptation, which suggests that the spacing effect is robust enough to overcome the shortage of optokinetic training cycles in hOKR adaptation. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-16T09:21:50Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-4afab62285cd4ef0a2db4d4f603356c5 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2162-3279 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-16T09:21:50Z |
| publishDate | 2021-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Brain and Behavior |
| spelling | doaj.art-4afab62285cd4ef0a2db4d4f603356c52022-12-21T22:36:45ZengWileyBrain and Behavior2162-32792021-01-01111n/an/a10.1002/brb3.1944Efficacy of spaced learning in adaptation of optokinetic responseNgoc Chien Pham0Yong Gyu Kim1Sang Jeong Kim2Chang‐Hee Kim3Department of Otorhinolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery Konkuk University Medical Center Research Institute of Medical Science Konkuk University School of Medicine Seoul Republic of KoreaDepartment of Physiology Seoul National University College of Medicine Seoul Republic of KoreaDepartment of Physiology Seoul National University College of Medicine Seoul Republic of KoreaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery Konkuk University Medical Center Research Institute of Medical Science Konkuk University School of Medicine Seoul Republic of KoreaAbstract Introduction The superiority of spaced training, in which repeated training sessions are given with resting intervals, over massed training in learning efficacy has been well established. However, longer duration of total training time has been required for spaced training than massed training because spacing intervals intervene between training sessions in spaced training. Thus, the learning efficacy may not be simply compared between spaced and massed training in terms of “time efficiency.” The aim of the present study was to investigate the efficacy of spaced and massed training using adaptation of horizontal optokinetic reflex (hOKR) in mice. Methods Training paradigms were categorized into seven groups according to the duration of spacing interval, keeping total duration of hOKR training including spacing almost equal in all training paradigms. Results The amount of short‐term hOKR gain increase immediately after the 60 min hOKR training was not significantly different among seven training paradigms. The hOKR adaptation was still in progress during a spacing interval, and the increment in hOKR gain tended to be greater with the longer spacing interval. The increase in hOKR gain was maintained until 48 hr after the end of training in both massed and spaced training. Conclusion The short‐term learning effect was not significantly different among training paradigms regardless of spacing interval in hOKR adaptation, which suggests that the spacing effect is robust enough to overcome the shortage of optokinetic training cycles in hOKR adaptation.https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1944adaptationcerebellummassed trainingmotor learningoptokinetic reflexspaced training |
| spellingShingle | Ngoc Chien Pham Yong Gyu Kim Sang Jeong Kim Chang‐Hee Kim Efficacy of spaced learning in adaptation of optokinetic response Brain and Behavior adaptation cerebellum massed training motor learning optokinetic reflex spaced training |
| title | Efficacy of spaced learning in adaptation of optokinetic response |
| title_full | Efficacy of spaced learning in adaptation of optokinetic response |
| title_fullStr | Efficacy of spaced learning in adaptation of optokinetic response |
| title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of spaced learning in adaptation of optokinetic response |
| title_short | Efficacy of spaced learning in adaptation of optokinetic response |
| title_sort | efficacy of spaced learning in adaptation of optokinetic response |
| topic | adaptation cerebellum massed training motor learning optokinetic reflex spaced training |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1944 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ngocchienpham efficacyofspacedlearninginadaptationofoptokineticresponse AT yonggyukim efficacyofspacedlearninginadaptationofoptokineticresponse AT sangjeongkim efficacyofspacedlearninginadaptationofoptokineticresponse AT changheekim efficacyofspacedlearninginadaptationofoptokineticresponse |