Critique of Norman Malcolm’s View on the Relationship between Faith and Reasoning

The concept of faith and reasoning and how they are related is one of the controversial issues that humanity has been facing for a long time. Norman Malcolm, an American philosopher and one of Wittgenstein's most famous students and commentators, has a unique expression about faith and reasonin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Seyed Davoud Ataei, Mohammad Hossein Mahdavinejad, Mahin Rezaei, Zeinab Shakibi
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Imam Sadiq University 2022-09-01
Series:پژوهشنامه فلسفه دین
Subjects:
Online Access:https://prrj.isu.ac.ir/article_76342_86352c121b83ac490b80d62896123d6b.pdf
_version_ 1797272279152852992
author Seyed Davoud Ataei
Mohammad Hossein Mahdavinejad
Mahin Rezaei
Zeinab Shakibi
author_facet Seyed Davoud Ataei
Mohammad Hossein Mahdavinejad
Mahin Rezaei
Zeinab Shakibi
author_sort Seyed Davoud Ataei
collection DOAJ
description The concept of faith and reasoning and how they are related is one of the controversial issues that humanity has been facing for a long time. Norman Malcolm, an American philosopher and one of Wittgenstein's most famous students and commentators, has a unique expression about faith and reasoning and the relationship between the two, relying on Wittgenstein's later thoughts such as language game, the form of life, etc. By presenting similarities between the philosophical understanding and the characteristics of Wittgenstein's religious thought, Malcolm intends to find a solid relationship between faith and reasoning. Malcolm has explained the types of resemblance between faith and reasoning by appealing to concepts such as the finality of explanation, religious wonder, the elimination of error, the belief in the primacy of action and the groundlessness of belief. This issue leads him to the fact that the source of faith and reasoning is one thing, and in other words, these two are connected in a baseless foundation. In this article, with a descriptive-analytical method and in a systematic manner, an attempt has been made both to achieve a correct understanding of Malcolm's thoughts about the relationship between faith and reasoning, using his works and passages, and to review the opinions and criticisms of his critics such as Peter Winch and Kai Nelson.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T14:26:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4b0827bcc9394c01a3101ba72f3861ea
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2228-6578
2228-6586
language fas
last_indexed 2024-03-07T14:26:06Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Imam Sadiq University
record_format Article
series پژوهشنامه فلسفه دین
spelling doaj.art-4b0827bcc9394c01a3101ba72f3861ea2024-03-06T07:56:49ZfasImam Sadiq Universityپژوهشنامه فلسفه دین2228-65782228-65862022-09-0120213315210.30497/prr.2022.242617.174776342Critique of Norman Malcolm’s View on the Relationship between Faith and ReasoningSeyed Davoud Ataei0Mohammad Hossein Mahdavinejad1Mahin Rezaei2Zeinab Shakibi3Ph.D. Student of Philosophy of Religion, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran.Associate Professor, Islamic Philosophy and Theology Department, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran.Assistant Professor, Islamic Philosophy and Theology Department, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran.Assistant Professor, Islamic Philosophy and Theology Department, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran.The concept of faith and reasoning and how they are related is one of the controversial issues that humanity has been facing for a long time. Norman Malcolm, an American philosopher and one of Wittgenstein's most famous students and commentators, has a unique expression about faith and reasoning and the relationship between the two, relying on Wittgenstein's later thoughts such as language game, the form of life, etc. By presenting similarities between the philosophical understanding and the characteristics of Wittgenstein's religious thought, Malcolm intends to find a solid relationship between faith and reasoning. Malcolm has explained the types of resemblance between faith and reasoning by appealing to concepts such as the finality of explanation, religious wonder, the elimination of error, the belief in the primacy of action and the groundlessness of belief. This issue leads him to the fact that the source of faith and reasoning is one thing, and in other words, these two are connected in a baseless foundation. In this article, with a descriptive-analytical method and in a systematic manner, an attempt has been made both to achieve a correct understanding of Malcolm's thoughts about the relationship between faith and reasoning, using his works and passages, and to review the opinions and criticisms of his critics such as Peter Winch and Kai Nelson.https://prrj.isu.ac.ir/article_76342_86352c121b83ac490b80d62896123d6b.pdffaithreasoninglanguage gameform of lifemalcolmwinchnelson
spellingShingle Seyed Davoud Ataei
Mohammad Hossein Mahdavinejad
Mahin Rezaei
Zeinab Shakibi
Critique of Norman Malcolm’s View on the Relationship between Faith and Reasoning
پژوهشنامه فلسفه دین
faith
reasoning
language game
form of life
malcolm
winch
nelson
title Critique of Norman Malcolm’s View on the Relationship between Faith and Reasoning
title_full Critique of Norman Malcolm’s View on the Relationship between Faith and Reasoning
title_fullStr Critique of Norman Malcolm’s View on the Relationship between Faith and Reasoning
title_full_unstemmed Critique of Norman Malcolm’s View on the Relationship between Faith and Reasoning
title_short Critique of Norman Malcolm’s View on the Relationship between Faith and Reasoning
title_sort critique of norman malcolm s view on the relationship between faith and reasoning
topic faith
reasoning
language game
form of life
malcolm
winch
nelson
url https://prrj.isu.ac.ir/article_76342_86352c121b83ac490b80d62896123d6b.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT seyeddavoudataei critiqueofnormanmalcolmsviewontherelationshipbetweenfaithandreasoning
AT mohammadhosseinmahdavinejad critiqueofnormanmalcolmsviewontherelationshipbetweenfaithandreasoning
AT mahinrezaei critiqueofnormanmalcolmsviewontherelationshipbetweenfaithandreasoning
AT zeinabshakibi critiqueofnormanmalcolmsviewontherelationshipbetweenfaithandreasoning