Resistance to Dutch elm disease reduces presence of xylem endophytic fungi in Elms (Ulmus spp.).

Efforts to introduce pathogen resistance into landscape tree species by breeding may have unintended consequences for fungal diversity. To address this issue, we compared the frequency and diversity of endophytic fungi and defensive phenolic metabolites in elm (Ulmus spp.) trees with genotypes known...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Juan A Martín, Johanna Witzell, Kathrin Blumenstein, Elzbieta Rozpedowska, Marjo Helander, Thomas N Sieber, Luis Gil
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3585289?pdf=render
_version_ 1819089597602201600
author Juan A Martín
Johanna Witzell
Kathrin Blumenstein
Elzbieta Rozpedowska
Marjo Helander
Thomas N Sieber
Luis Gil
author_facet Juan A Martín
Johanna Witzell
Kathrin Blumenstein
Elzbieta Rozpedowska
Marjo Helander
Thomas N Sieber
Luis Gil
author_sort Juan A Martín
collection DOAJ
description Efforts to introduce pathogen resistance into landscape tree species by breeding may have unintended consequences for fungal diversity. To address this issue, we compared the frequency and diversity of endophytic fungi and defensive phenolic metabolites in elm (Ulmus spp.) trees with genotypes known to differ in resistance to Dutch elm disease. Our results indicate that resistant U. minor and U. pumila genotypes exhibit a lower frequency and diversity of fungal endophytes in the xylem than susceptible U. minor genotypes. However, resistant and susceptible genotypes showed a similar frequency and diversity of endophytes in the leaves and bark. The resistant and susceptible genotypes could be discriminated on the basis of the phenolic profile of the xylem, but not on basis of phenolics in the leaves or bark. As the Dutch elm disease pathogen develops within xylem tissues, the defensive chemistry of resistant elm genotypes thus appears to be one of the factors that may limit colonization by both the pathogen and endophytes. We discuss a potential trade-off between the benefits of breeding resistance into tree species, versus concomitant losses of fungal endophytes and the ecosystem services they provide.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T22:10:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4b0e099fcd33410b9e4041acc4ef5acd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T22:10:28Z
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-4b0e099fcd33410b9e4041acc4ef5acd2022-12-21T18:48:36ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-0182e5698710.1371/journal.pone.0056987Resistance to Dutch elm disease reduces presence of xylem endophytic fungi in Elms (Ulmus spp.).Juan A MartínJohanna WitzellKathrin BlumensteinElzbieta RozpedowskaMarjo HelanderThomas N SieberLuis GilEfforts to introduce pathogen resistance into landscape tree species by breeding may have unintended consequences for fungal diversity. To address this issue, we compared the frequency and diversity of endophytic fungi and defensive phenolic metabolites in elm (Ulmus spp.) trees with genotypes known to differ in resistance to Dutch elm disease. Our results indicate that resistant U. minor and U. pumila genotypes exhibit a lower frequency and diversity of fungal endophytes in the xylem than susceptible U. minor genotypes. However, resistant and susceptible genotypes showed a similar frequency and diversity of endophytes in the leaves and bark. The resistant and susceptible genotypes could be discriminated on the basis of the phenolic profile of the xylem, but not on basis of phenolics in the leaves or bark. As the Dutch elm disease pathogen develops within xylem tissues, the defensive chemistry of resistant elm genotypes thus appears to be one of the factors that may limit colonization by both the pathogen and endophytes. We discuss a potential trade-off between the benefits of breeding resistance into tree species, versus concomitant losses of fungal endophytes and the ecosystem services they provide.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3585289?pdf=render
spellingShingle Juan A Martín
Johanna Witzell
Kathrin Blumenstein
Elzbieta Rozpedowska
Marjo Helander
Thomas N Sieber
Luis Gil
Resistance to Dutch elm disease reduces presence of xylem endophytic fungi in Elms (Ulmus spp.).
PLoS ONE
title Resistance to Dutch elm disease reduces presence of xylem endophytic fungi in Elms (Ulmus spp.).
title_full Resistance to Dutch elm disease reduces presence of xylem endophytic fungi in Elms (Ulmus spp.).
title_fullStr Resistance to Dutch elm disease reduces presence of xylem endophytic fungi in Elms (Ulmus spp.).
title_full_unstemmed Resistance to Dutch elm disease reduces presence of xylem endophytic fungi in Elms (Ulmus spp.).
title_short Resistance to Dutch elm disease reduces presence of xylem endophytic fungi in Elms (Ulmus spp.).
title_sort resistance to dutch elm disease reduces presence of xylem endophytic fungi in elms ulmus spp
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3585289?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT juanamartin resistancetodutchelmdiseasereducespresenceofxylemendophyticfungiinelmsulmusspp
AT johannawitzell resistancetodutchelmdiseasereducespresenceofxylemendophyticfungiinelmsulmusspp
AT kathrinblumenstein resistancetodutchelmdiseasereducespresenceofxylemendophyticfungiinelmsulmusspp
AT elzbietarozpedowska resistancetodutchelmdiseasereducespresenceofxylemendophyticfungiinelmsulmusspp
AT marjohelander resistancetodutchelmdiseasereducespresenceofxylemendophyticfungiinelmsulmusspp
AT thomasnsieber resistancetodutchelmdiseasereducespresenceofxylemendophyticfungiinelmsulmusspp
AT luisgil resistancetodutchelmdiseasereducespresenceofxylemendophyticfungiinelmsulmusspp