Underestimation of risk for large babies in rural and remote Australia: Time to change plasma glucose collection protocols

Aims: Preanalytical glycolysis in oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT) leads to substantial underestimation of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and hence risk for large-for-gestational-age (LGA) babies. This paper quantified the impact of glycolysis on identification of LGA risk in a prospective r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emma L. Jamieson, Erica P. Spry, Andrew B. Kirke, Carly Roxburgh, David N. Atkinson, Julia V. Marley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-03-01
Series:Journal of Clinical & Translational Endocrinology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214623720301010
_version_ 1818615103230050304
author Emma L. Jamieson
Erica P. Spry
Andrew B. Kirke
Carly Roxburgh
David N. Atkinson
Julia V. Marley
author_facet Emma L. Jamieson
Erica P. Spry
Andrew B. Kirke
Carly Roxburgh
David N. Atkinson
Julia V. Marley
author_sort Emma L. Jamieson
collection DOAJ
description Aims: Preanalytical glycolysis in oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT) leads to substantial underestimation of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and hence risk for large-for-gestational-age (LGA) babies. This paper quantified the impact of glycolysis on identification of LGA risk in a prospective rural and remote Australian cohort. Methods: For 495 women, OGTT results from room temperature fluoride-oxalate (FLOX) tubes were algorithmically corrected for estimated glycolysis compared to 1) the Hyperglycaemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes (HAPO) study protocol (FLOX tubes in ice-slurry); and 2) room temperature fluoride-citrate (FC) tubes. GDM was defined by International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria. Unadjusted and corrected OGTT were related to LGA outcome. Results: Correction for FC tubes increased GDM incidence from 9.7% to 44.6%. After correction for HAPO protocol, GDM incidence was 27.7% and prediction of LGA risk (RR 1.82, [1.11–2.99]) improved compared to unadjusted rates (RR 1.12, [0.51–2.47]). To provide similar results for FC tube correction (29.3% GDM; RR 1.81, [1.11–2.96]) required + 0.2 mmol/L adjustment of IADPSG criteria. Conclusions: FC tubes present a practical alternative to the HAPO protocol in remote settings but give + 0.2 mmol/L higher glucose readings. Modification of IADPSG criteria would reduce perceived ‘overdiagnosis’ and improve LGA risk-assessment.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T16:28:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4b0ff7fa797b4abaa6d48e2a4ccd3b56
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2214-6237
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T16:28:35Z
publishDate 2021-03-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical & Translational Endocrinology
spelling doaj.art-4b0ff7fa797b4abaa6d48e2a4ccd3b562022-12-21T22:24:39ZengElsevierJournal of Clinical & Translational Endocrinology2214-62372021-03-0123100247Underestimation of risk for large babies in rural and remote Australia: Time to change plasma glucose collection protocolsEmma L. Jamieson0Erica P. Spry1Andrew B. Kirke2Carly Roxburgh3David N. Atkinson4Julia V. Marley5The University of Western Australia, The Rural Clinical School of Western Australia, Building 3 Edith Cowan University Campus, Robertson Drive, PO Box 412, Bunbury 6230, Australia; Corresponding author at: The Rural Clinical School of WA, PO Box 412, Bunbury 6230, Western Australia.Kimberley Aboriginal Medical Services, 12 Napier Terrace, Broome 6725, Australia; The University of Western Australia, The Rural Clinical School of Western Australia, 12 Napier Terrace, PO Box 1377, Broome 6725, AustraliaThe University of Western Australia, The Rural Clinical School of Western Australia, Building 3 Edith Cowan University Campus, Robertson Drive, PO Box 412, Bunbury 6230, AustraliaThe University of Western Australia, The Rural Clinical School of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Terrace, Albany 6330, AustraliaThe University of Western Australia, The Rural Clinical School of Western Australia, 12 Napier Terrace, PO Box 1377, Broome 6725, AustraliaKimberley Aboriginal Medical Services, 12 Napier Terrace, Broome 6725, Australia; The University of Western Australia, The Rural Clinical School of Western Australia, 12 Napier Terrace, PO Box 1377, Broome 6725, AustraliaAims: Preanalytical glycolysis in oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT) leads to substantial underestimation of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and hence risk for large-for-gestational-age (LGA) babies. This paper quantified the impact of glycolysis on identification of LGA risk in a prospective rural and remote Australian cohort. Methods: For 495 women, OGTT results from room temperature fluoride-oxalate (FLOX) tubes were algorithmically corrected for estimated glycolysis compared to 1) the Hyperglycaemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes (HAPO) study protocol (FLOX tubes in ice-slurry); and 2) room temperature fluoride-citrate (FC) tubes. GDM was defined by International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria. Unadjusted and corrected OGTT were related to LGA outcome. Results: Correction for FC tubes increased GDM incidence from 9.7% to 44.6%. After correction for HAPO protocol, GDM incidence was 27.7% and prediction of LGA risk (RR 1.82, [1.11–2.99]) improved compared to unadjusted rates (RR 1.12, [0.51–2.47]). To provide similar results for FC tube correction (29.3% GDM; RR 1.81, [1.11–2.96]) required + 0.2 mmol/L adjustment of IADPSG criteria. Conclusions: FC tubes present a practical alternative to the HAPO protocol in remote settings but give + 0.2 mmol/L higher glucose readings. Modification of IADPSG criteria would reduce perceived ‘overdiagnosis’ and improve LGA risk-assessment.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214623720301010Gestational diabetesGlycolysisDiagnosticsRural and remote healthIndigenous healthPregnancy outcomes
spellingShingle Emma L. Jamieson
Erica P. Spry
Andrew B. Kirke
Carly Roxburgh
David N. Atkinson
Julia V. Marley
Underestimation of risk for large babies in rural and remote Australia: Time to change plasma glucose collection protocols
Journal of Clinical & Translational Endocrinology
Gestational diabetes
Glycolysis
Diagnostics
Rural and remote health
Indigenous health
Pregnancy outcomes
title Underestimation of risk for large babies in rural and remote Australia: Time to change plasma glucose collection protocols
title_full Underestimation of risk for large babies in rural and remote Australia: Time to change plasma glucose collection protocols
title_fullStr Underestimation of risk for large babies in rural and remote Australia: Time to change plasma glucose collection protocols
title_full_unstemmed Underestimation of risk for large babies in rural and remote Australia: Time to change plasma glucose collection protocols
title_short Underestimation of risk for large babies in rural and remote Australia: Time to change plasma glucose collection protocols
title_sort underestimation of risk for large babies in rural and remote australia time to change plasma glucose collection protocols
topic Gestational diabetes
Glycolysis
Diagnostics
Rural and remote health
Indigenous health
Pregnancy outcomes
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214623720301010
work_keys_str_mv AT emmaljamieson underestimationofriskforlargebabiesinruralandremoteaustraliatimetochangeplasmaglucosecollectionprotocols
AT ericapspry underestimationofriskforlargebabiesinruralandremoteaustraliatimetochangeplasmaglucosecollectionprotocols
AT andrewbkirke underestimationofriskforlargebabiesinruralandremoteaustraliatimetochangeplasmaglucosecollectionprotocols
AT carlyroxburgh underestimationofriskforlargebabiesinruralandremoteaustraliatimetochangeplasmaglucosecollectionprotocols
AT davidnatkinson underestimationofriskforlargebabiesinruralandremoteaustraliatimetochangeplasmaglucosecollectionprotocols
AT juliavmarley underestimationofriskforlargebabiesinruralandremoteaustraliatimetochangeplasmaglucosecollectionprotocols