Incidental Findings in CT and MR Angiography for Preoperative Planning in DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction

Background:. Autologous breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps is considered a standard of care in the treatment after mastectomy, yet vascular anatomy is highly variable and perforator selection remains challenging. The use of preoperative imaging can influence surgica...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ryan D. Wagner, MD, Andres F. Doval, MD, Nikhilesh V. Mehra, Hung B. Le, Paul A. Niziol, BS, Warren A. Ellsworth, MD, Aldona J. Spiegel, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer 2020-10-01
Series:Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
Online Access:http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003159
_version_ 1819076544550666240
author Ryan D. Wagner, MD
Andres F. Doval, MD
Nikhilesh V. Mehra
Hung B. Le
Paul A. Niziol, BS
Warren A. Ellsworth, MD
Aldona J. Spiegel, MD
author_facet Ryan D. Wagner, MD
Andres F. Doval, MD
Nikhilesh V. Mehra
Hung B. Le
Paul A. Niziol, BS
Warren A. Ellsworth, MD
Aldona J. Spiegel, MD
author_sort Ryan D. Wagner, MD
collection DOAJ
description Background:. Autologous breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps is considered a standard of care in the treatment after mastectomy, yet vascular anatomy is highly variable and perforator selection remains challenging. The use of preoperative imaging can influence surgical planning and assist intraoperative decision-making. However, this imaging can inevitably uncover incidental findings. The purpose of this study was to analyze incidental findings, evaluate correlation with patient factors, and examine effects on overall care. Methods:. A retrospective review was performed on 350 consecutive patients who received magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) or computed tomographic angiography (CTA) as a preoperative evaluation for deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstructions done between August 2015 and June 2019. Radiology reports were analyzed for incidental findings. Patient charts were reviewed for patient history, genetic history, cancer treatment, and type of reconstruction. Results:. Of the 350 patients meeting the criteria, 56.9% were noted to have incidental findings on preoperative imaging, 12.9% received additional imaging, and 4.0% underwent additional interventions. There was no difference in the percentage of patients with incidental findings between immediate and delayed reconstructions or between CTA and MRA. Five patients were found to have malignancies. Conclusions:. Preoperative CTA and MRA is a valuable tool to optimize outcomes and efficiency in breast reconstruction with abdominal perforator flaps. However, this imaging can also be beneficial to the overall wellness of the patient. With the high prevalence of incidental findings on preoperative imaging, it is important to counsel patients and adjust surgical plans, if necessary.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T18:43:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4b145b7f09b845d0990f2f2211ec1c0d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2169-7574
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T18:43:00Z
publishDate 2020-10-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format Article
series Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
spelling doaj.art-4b145b7f09b845d0990f2f2211ec1c0d2022-12-21T18:53:57ZengWolters KluwerPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open2169-75742020-10-01810e315910.1097/GOX.0000000000003159202010000-00004Incidental Findings in CT and MR Angiography for Preoperative Planning in DIEP Flap Breast ReconstructionRyan D. Wagner, MD0Andres F. Doval, MD1Nikhilesh V. Mehra2Hung B. Le3Paul A. Niziol, BS4Warren A. Ellsworth, MD5Aldona J. Spiegel, MD6From the * Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex.† Institute for Reconstructive Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, Houston, Tex.‡ Undergraduate Student, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex.‡ Undergraduate Student, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex.† Institute for Reconstructive Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, Houston, Tex.† Institute for Reconstructive Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, Houston, Tex.† Institute for Reconstructive Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, Houston, Tex.Background:. Autologous breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps is considered a standard of care in the treatment after mastectomy, yet vascular anatomy is highly variable and perforator selection remains challenging. The use of preoperative imaging can influence surgical planning and assist intraoperative decision-making. However, this imaging can inevitably uncover incidental findings. The purpose of this study was to analyze incidental findings, evaluate correlation with patient factors, and examine effects on overall care. Methods:. A retrospective review was performed on 350 consecutive patients who received magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) or computed tomographic angiography (CTA) as a preoperative evaluation for deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstructions done between August 2015 and June 2019. Radiology reports were analyzed for incidental findings. Patient charts were reviewed for patient history, genetic history, cancer treatment, and type of reconstruction. Results:. Of the 350 patients meeting the criteria, 56.9% were noted to have incidental findings on preoperative imaging, 12.9% received additional imaging, and 4.0% underwent additional interventions. There was no difference in the percentage of patients with incidental findings between immediate and delayed reconstructions or between CTA and MRA. Five patients were found to have malignancies. Conclusions:. Preoperative CTA and MRA is a valuable tool to optimize outcomes and efficiency in breast reconstruction with abdominal perforator flaps. However, this imaging can also be beneficial to the overall wellness of the patient. With the high prevalence of incidental findings on preoperative imaging, it is important to counsel patients and adjust surgical plans, if necessary.http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003159
spellingShingle Ryan D. Wagner, MD
Andres F. Doval, MD
Nikhilesh V. Mehra
Hung B. Le
Paul A. Niziol, BS
Warren A. Ellsworth, MD
Aldona J. Spiegel, MD
Incidental Findings in CT and MR Angiography for Preoperative Planning in DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
title Incidental Findings in CT and MR Angiography for Preoperative Planning in DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction
title_full Incidental Findings in CT and MR Angiography for Preoperative Planning in DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction
title_fullStr Incidental Findings in CT and MR Angiography for Preoperative Planning in DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Incidental Findings in CT and MR Angiography for Preoperative Planning in DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction
title_short Incidental Findings in CT and MR Angiography for Preoperative Planning in DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction
title_sort incidental findings in ct and mr angiography for preoperative planning in diep flap breast reconstruction
url http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003159
work_keys_str_mv AT ryandwagnermd incidentalfindingsinctandmrangiographyforpreoperativeplanningindiepflapbreastreconstruction
AT andresfdovalmd incidentalfindingsinctandmrangiographyforpreoperativeplanningindiepflapbreastreconstruction
AT nikhileshvmehra incidentalfindingsinctandmrangiographyforpreoperativeplanningindiepflapbreastreconstruction
AT hungble incidentalfindingsinctandmrangiographyforpreoperativeplanningindiepflapbreastreconstruction
AT paulaniziolbs incidentalfindingsinctandmrangiographyforpreoperativeplanningindiepflapbreastreconstruction
AT warrenaellsworthmd incidentalfindingsinctandmrangiographyforpreoperativeplanningindiepflapbreastreconstruction
AT aldonajspiegelmd incidentalfindingsinctandmrangiographyforpreoperativeplanningindiepflapbreastreconstruction