Erratum to: Evaluation of biases present in the cohort multiple randomised controlled trial design: a simulation study

Erratum to: Evaluation of biases present in the cohort multiple randomised controlled trial design: a simulation study

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Jane Candlish, Alexander Pate, Matthew Sperrin, Tjeerd van Staa, on behalf of GetReal Work Package 2
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	BMC 2017-03-01
Series:	BMC Medical Research Methodology
Online Access:	http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-017-0326-4

Similar Items

Evaluation of biases present in the cohort multiple randomised controlled trial design: a simulation study
by: Jane Candlish, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01)

Cohort Multiple Randomised Controlled Trials (cmRCT) design: efficient but biased? A simulation study to evaluate the feasibility of the Cluster cmRCT design
by: Alexander Pate, et al.
Published: (2016-08-01)

The “RCT augmentation”: a novel simulation method to add patient heterogeneity into phase III trials
by: Helene Karcher, et al.
Published: (2018-07-01)

Impact of sample size on the stability of risk scores from clinical prediction models: a case study in cardiovascular disease
by: Alexander Pate, et al.
Published: (2020-09-01)

The inclusion of real world evidence in clinical development planning
by: Reynaldo Martina, et al.
Published: (2018-08-01)

The uncertainty with using risk prediction models for individual decision making: an exemplar cohort study examining the prediction of cardiovascular disease in English primary care
by: Alexander Pate, et al.
Published: (2019-07-01)

Correction to: The uncertainty with using risk prediction models for individual decision making: an exemplar cohort study examining the prediction of cardiovascular disease in English primary care
by: Alexander Pate, et al.
Published: (2019-08-01)

Social media as a tool for assessing patient perspectives on quality of life in metastatic melanoma: a feasibility study
by: Amr Makady, et al.
Published: (2018-11-01)

The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews.
by: Kirkham, J, et al.
Published: (2010)

Erratum: Understanding bias in the medical literature: With reflections on metastasectomy
by: Fergus Macbeth, et al.
Published: (2021-11-01)

Outcome reporting bias in randomised trials
by: Chan, A, et al.
Published: (2003)

Preventing bias in cluster randomised trials.
by: Bruno Giraudeau, et al.
Published: (2009-05-01)

Methodological bias in cluster randomised trials
by: Torgerson David J, et al.
Published: (2005-03-01)

Evaluation protocol of the implementation of a learning healthcare system in clinical practice: the Connected Health Cities programme in the north of England
by: Tjeerd Van Staa, et al.
Published: (2019-06-01)

Risk of bias in published randomised controlled trials
by: Indubala Maurya, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01)

The role of real-world data in the development of treatment guidelines: a case study on guideline developers’ opinions about using observational data on antibiotic prescribing in primary care
by: Stephanie Steels, et al.
Published: (2019-12-01)

Appropriate statistical methods for analysing partially nested randomised controlled trials with continuous outcomes: a simulation study
by: Jane Candlish, et al.
Published: (2018-10-01)

Treatment effect bias in randomised controlled trials using surrogate outcomes: a preliminary cohort study analysis
by: Ciani Oriana, et al.
Published: (2011-12-01)

Randomised Evaluations of Accepted Choices in Treatment (REACT) trials: large-scale pragmatic trials within databases of routinely collected electronic healthcare records
by: van Staa Tjeerd-Pieter, et al.
Published: (2011-12-01)

Mechanisms and direction of allocation bias in randomised clinical trials
by: Asger Paludan-Müller, et al.
Published: (2016-10-01)

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on rates and predictors of missed hospital appointments in multiple outpatient clinics of The Royal Hospital, Sultanate of Oman: a retrospective study
by: Ahmed Alawadhi, et al.
Published: (2023-12-01)

Are the poor so present-biased?
by: Cassidy, R
Published: (2018)

Developing generic templates to shape the future for conducting integrated research platform trials
by: Madhavi Gidh-Jain, et al.
Published: (2024-03-01)

The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.
by: Higgins, J, et al.
Published: (2011)

The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
by: Higgins, J, et al.
Published: (2011)

Sponsorship bias and quality of randomised controlled trials in veterinary medicine
by: K. J. Wareham, et al.
Published: (2017-08-01)

Implementation of a “real‐world” learning health system: Results from the evaluation of the Connected Health Cities programme
by: Stephanie Steels, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01)

Optimal parenting with present-biased children
by: Goh, Fang Ru, et al.
Published: (2017)

Present bias and corporate tax policies
by: Kang, Minwook, et al.
Published: (2021)

Erratum to: The effects of an extensive exercise programme on the progression of mild cognitive impairment (MCI): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
by: Kate E. Devenney, et al.
Published: (2017-05-01)

The Impact of Oral Antibiotics Prior to Cancer Diagnosis on Overall Patient Survival: Findings from an English Population-Based Cohort Study
by: Eleni Domzaridou, et al.
Published: (2023-09-01)

Use of statins, risk of fracture and age-band bias
by: De Vries, F, et al.
Published: (2006)

Response to "Why all randomised controlled trials produce biased results"
by: Althouse, A, et al.
Published: (2018)

Wildlife documentaries present a diverse, but biased, portrayal of the natural world
by: Kate Howlett, et al.
Published: (2023-04-01)

Evaluation of a policy intervention to promote the health and wellbeing of workers in small and medium sized enterprises – a cluster randomised controlled trial
by: Thrive at Work Wellbeing Programme Collaboration
Published: (2019-05-01)

The effectiveness of frequent antibiotic use in reducing the risk of infection-related hospital admissions: results from two large population-based cohorts
by: Tjeerd Pieter van Staa, et al.
Published: (2020-03-01)

Multiple imputation with missing indicators as proxies for unmeasured variables: simulation study
by: Matthew Sperrin, et al.
Published: (2020-07-01)

Erratum: CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
by: Schulz, K, et al.
Published: (2011)

Linking strategies and biases when matching cohorts to the National Pupil Database.
by: Johnny Downs, et al.
Published: (2017-04-01)

Ventriculoperitoneal shunt presenting as umbilical CSF fistula
by: Meenakshi Yeola (Pate), et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)