Decreased Prognostic Value of International Prognostic Score in Chinese Advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients Treated in the Contemporary Era

Background: The International Prognostic Score (IPS) was developed based on the data of Western advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients treated before 1992. Only a few studies ever evaluated the application value of IPS in Chinese population or in patients treated in the contemporary era whose outco...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Qin Wang, Yan Qin, Su-Yi Kang, Xiao-Hui He, Peng Liu, Sheng Yang, Sheng-Yu Zhou, Chang-Gong Zhang, Lin Gui, Jian-Liang Yang, Yan Sun, Yuan-Kai Shi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer 2016-01-01
Series:Chinese Medical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.cmj.org/article.asp?issn=0366-6999;year=2016;volume=129;issue=23;spage=2780;epage=2785;aulast=Wang
_version_ 1811298279783137280
author Qin Wang
Yan Qin
Su-Yi Kang
Xiao-Hui He
Peng Liu
Sheng Yang
Sheng-Yu Zhou
Chang-Gong Zhang
Lin Gui
Jian-Liang Yang
Yan Sun
Yuan-Kai Shi
author_facet Qin Wang
Yan Qin
Su-Yi Kang
Xiao-Hui He
Peng Liu
Sheng Yang
Sheng-Yu Zhou
Chang-Gong Zhang
Lin Gui
Jian-Liang Yang
Yan Sun
Yuan-Kai Shi
author_sort Qin Wang
collection DOAJ
description Background: The International Prognostic Score (IPS) was developed based on the data of Western advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients treated before 1992. Only a few studies ever evaluated the application value of IPS in Chinese population or in patients treated in the contemporary era whose outcomes has improved significantly than before. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study involving 208 previously untreated Chinese advanced HL patients, who were admitted to Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from January 1, 1999 to April 30, 2015 and received uniform first-line treatment. The prognostic value of both IPS and the seven IPS factors for freedom-from progression (FFP) and overall survival (OS) was assessed in this population. The statistical methods included Kaplan-Meier methodology, log-rank testing, and Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. Results: With a median follow-up time of 79 months (range, 15–210 months), the 5-year FFP and OS were 78.8% and 86.0% respectively, which improved obviously compared with the original IPS study. The IPS remained prognostic for both FFP (P = 0.041) and OS (P = 0.013), but the range narrowed obviously, with 5-year FFP ranging from 87.2% to 61.5%, 5-year OS ranging from 94.1% to 69.2%, and the separation of survival curves was not as good as before. Only two of the seven IPS factors showed a significant independent prognostic value in the multivariate analysis: Stage IV (for FFP, hazard ratio [HR] = 2.219, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.148–3.948, P = 0.016; for OS, HR = 2.491, 95% CI: 1.159–5.355, P = 0.019) and hemoglobin <105 g/L (for FFP, HR = 2.136, 95% CI: 1.123–4.060, P = 0.021; for OS, HR = 2.345, 95% CI: 1.099–5.042, P = 0.028). A simple prognostic score calculated by adding one point each for any of the two factors was prognostic both for FFP (P < 0.001) and OS (P < 0.001) with the survival curves separating very well, but the range still narrowed. Conclusions: The IPS has decreased the prognostic value in Chinese advanced HL patients treated in the contemporary era. More prognostic factors are needed to supplement this original scoring system so as to identify different risk populations more accurately.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T06:17:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4b3954bbaaea4000bb7046d8e82a85bb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0366-6999
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T06:17:10Z
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format Article
series Chinese Medical Journal
spelling doaj.art-4b3954bbaaea4000bb7046d8e82a85bb2022-12-22T02:58:47ZengWolters KluwerChinese Medical Journal0366-69992016-01-01129232780278510.4103/0366-6999.194661Decreased Prognostic Value of International Prognostic Score in Chinese Advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients Treated in the Contemporary EraQin WangYan QinSu-Yi KangXiao-Hui HePeng LiuSheng YangSheng-Yu ZhouChang-Gong ZhangLin GuiJian-Liang YangYan SunYuan-Kai ShiBackground: The International Prognostic Score (IPS) was developed based on the data of Western advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients treated before 1992. Only a few studies ever evaluated the application value of IPS in Chinese population or in patients treated in the contemporary era whose outcomes has improved significantly than before. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study involving 208 previously untreated Chinese advanced HL patients, who were admitted to Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from January 1, 1999 to April 30, 2015 and received uniform first-line treatment. The prognostic value of both IPS and the seven IPS factors for freedom-from progression (FFP) and overall survival (OS) was assessed in this population. The statistical methods included Kaplan-Meier methodology, log-rank testing, and Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. Results: With a median follow-up time of 79 months (range, 15–210 months), the 5-year FFP and OS were 78.8% and 86.0% respectively, which improved obviously compared with the original IPS study. The IPS remained prognostic for both FFP (P = 0.041) and OS (P = 0.013), but the range narrowed obviously, with 5-year FFP ranging from 87.2% to 61.5%, 5-year OS ranging from 94.1% to 69.2%, and the separation of survival curves was not as good as before. Only two of the seven IPS factors showed a significant independent prognostic value in the multivariate analysis: Stage IV (for FFP, hazard ratio [HR] = 2.219, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.148–3.948, P = 0.016; for OS, HR = 2.491, 95% CI: 1.159–5.355, P = 0.019) and hemoglobin <105 g/L (for FFP, HR = 2.136, 95% CI: 1.123–4.060, P = 0.021; for OS, HR = 2.345, 95% CI: 1.099–5.042, P = 0.028). A simple prognostic score calculated by adding one point each for any of the two factors was prognostic both for FFP (P < 0.001) and OS (P < 0.001) with the survival curves separating very well, but the range still narrowed. Conclusions: The IPS has decreased the prognostic value in Chinese advanced HL patients treated in the contemporary era. More prognostic factors are needed to supplement this original scoring system so as to identify different risk populations more accurately.http://www.cmj.org/article.asp?issn=0366-6999;year=2016;volume=129;issue=23;spage=2780;epage=2785;aulast=WangHodgkin Lymphoma; International Prognostic Score; Prognosis
spellingShingle Qin Wang
Yan Qin
Su-Yi Kang
Xiao-Hui He
Peng Liu
Sheng Yang
Sheng-Yu Zhou
Chang-Gong Zhang
Lin Gui
Jian-Liang Yang
Yan Sun
Yuan-Kai Shi
Decreased Prognostic Value of International Prognostic Score in Chinese Advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients Treated in the Contemporary Era
Chinese Medical Journal
Hodgkin Lymphoma; International Prognostic Score; Prognosis
title Decreased Prognostic Value of International Prognostic Score in Chinese Advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients Treated in the Contemporary Era
title_full Decreased Prognostic Value of International Prognostic Score in Chinese Advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients Treated in the Contemporary Era
title_fullStr Decreased Prognostic Value of International Prognostic Score in Chinese Advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients Treated in the Contemporary Era
title_full_unstemmed Decreased Prognostic Value of International Prognostic Score in Chinese Advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients Treated in the Contemporary Era
title_short Decreased Prognostic Value of International Prognostic Score in Chinese Advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients Treated in the Contemporary Era
title_sort decreased prognostic value of international prognostic score in chinese advanced hodgkin lymphoma patients treated in the contemporary era
topic Hodgkin Lymphoma; International Prognostic Score; Prognosis
url http://www.cmj.org/article.asp?issn=0366-6999;year=2016;volume=129;issue=23;spage=2780;epage=2785;aulast=Wang
work_keys_str_mv AT qinwang decreasedprognosticvalueofinternationalprognosticscoreinchineseadvancedhodgkinlymphomapatientstreatedinthecontemporaryera
AT yanqin decreasedprognosticvalueofinternationalprognosticscoreinchineseadvancedhodgkinlymphomapatientstreatedinthecontemporaryera
AT suyikang decreasedprognosticvalueofinternationalprognosticscoreinchineseadvancedhodgkinlymphomapatientstreatedinthecontemporaryera
AT xiaohuihe decreasedprognosticvalueofinternationalprognosticscoreinchineseadvancedhodgkinlymphomapatientstreatedinthecontemporaryera
AT pengliu decreasedprognosticvalueofinternationalprognosticscoreinchineseadvancedhodgkinlymphomapatientstreatedinthecontemporaryera
AT shengyang decreasedprognosticvalueofinternationalprognosticscoreinchineseadvancedhodgkinlymphomapatientstreatedinthecontemporaryera
AT shengyuzhou decreasedprognosticvalueofinternationalprognosticscoreinchineseadvancedhodgkinlymphomapatientstreatedinthecontemporaryera
AT changgongzhang decreasedprognosticvalueofinternationalprognosticscoreinchineseadvancedhodgkinlymphomapatientstreatedinthecontemporaryera
AT lingui decreasedprognosticvalueofinternationalprognosticscoreinchineseadvancedhodgkinlymphomapatientstreatedinthecontemporaryera
AT jianliangyang decreasedprognosticvalueofinternationalprognosticscoreinchineseadvancedhodgkinlymphomapatientstreatedinthecontemporaryera
AT yansun decreasedprognosticvalueofinternationalprognosticscoreinchineseadvancedhodgkinlymphomapatientstreatedinthecontemporaryera
AT yuankaishi decreasedprognosticvalueofinternationalprognosticscoreinchineseadvancedhodgkinlymphomapatientstreatedinthecontemporaryera