Prescription and Underprescription of Clozapine in Dutch Ambulatory Care

Purpose: To our knowledge, no study has examined in a structured way the extent of underprescription of clozapine in ambulatory patients with Non-Affective Psychotic Disorder (NAPD). In the Netherlands, psychiatric care for such patients is provided by Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (FACT) t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yvonne C. van der Zalm, Fabian Termorshuizen, Peter F. Schulte, Jan P. Bogers, Machteld Marcelis, Iris E. Sommer, Jean Paul Selten
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychiatry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00231/full
_version_ 1819224790883368960
author Yvonne C. van der Zalm
Yvonne C. van der Zalm
Fabian Termorshuizen
Peter F. Schulte
Peter F. Schulte
Jan P. Bogers
Jan P. Bogers
Machteld Marcelis
Machteld Marcelis
Iris E. Sommer
Jean Paul Selten
Jean Paul Selten
author_facet Yvonne C. van der Zalm
Yvonne C. van der Zalm
Fabian Termorshuizen
Peter F. Schulte
Peter F. Schulte
Jan P. Bogers
Jan P. Bogers
Machteld Marcelis
Machteld Marcelis
Iris E. Sommer
Jean Paul Selten
Jean Paul Selten
author_sort Yvonne C. van der Zalm
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: To our knowledge, no study has examined in a structured way the extent of underprescription of clozapine in ambulatory patients with Non-Affective Psychotic Disorder (NAPD). In the Netherlands, psychiatric care for such patients is provided by Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (FACT) teams and by early intervention teams. In 20 FACT teams and 3 early intervention teams we assessed the proportion of patients who: use clozapine (type 1 patients), previously used this drug (type 2), have an unfulfilled indication for this drug, by type of indication (type 3), or were at least markedly psychotic, but had not yet received two adequate treatments with other antipsychotic drugs (type 4). We expected to find major differences between teams. To rule out that these differences are caused by differences in severity of psychopathology, we also calculated the proportions of patients who use clozapine given an indication at any time (number of type 1 patients divided by the sum of type 1, 2, and 3 patients).Materials and methods: The nurse practitioner of each team identified the patients already on clozapine. Next, using a highly-structured decision tree, the nurse practitioner and psychiatrist assessed whether the remaining patients had an indication for this drug. Indications were treatment-resistant positive symptoms, tardive dyskinesia, aggression and suicidality. The severity of positive symptoms was determined using the Clinical Global Impression-Schizophrenia Scale (CGI-SCH).Results: In the participating FACT-teams 2,286 NAPD patients were assessed. The range among teams in proportions was: type 1: 8.8–34.7% (mean: 23.0%), type 2: 0–8.2% (mean: 3.5%), type 3: 1.7–15.6% (mean: 6.9%), type 4: 1.8–16.3% (mean: 8.6%). The range in proportions of patients using this drug given an indication was 49.0–90.9% (mean: 68.8%). These figures were lower in early intervention teams.Conclusions: The proportion of patients in FACT-teams who have an unfulfilled indication for clozapine is 6.9%. There were considerable differences between teams with respect to this proportion. Almost a third of the outpatients had at any time an indication for clozapine. If one takes type 4 patients into account, this proportion may be higher.Registration number: NTR5135 http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/index.asp
first_indexed 2024-12-23T09:59:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4b40d463fe6944dfa5446451c32f5537
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-0640
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T09:59:18Z
publishDate 2018-06-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychiatry
spelling doaj.art-4b40d463fe6944dfa5446451c32f55372022-12-21T17:51:18ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychiatry1664-06402018-06-01910.3389/fpsyt.2018.00231375178Prescription and Underprescription of Clozapine in Dutch Ambulatory CareYvonne C. van der Zalm0Yvonne C. van der Zalm1Fabian Termorshuizen2Peter F. Schulte3Peter F. Schulte4Jan P. Bogers5Jan P. Bogers6Machteld Marcelis7Machteld Marcelis8Iris E. Sommer9Jean Paul Selten10Jean Paul Selten11Department of Psychosis Research, Rivierduinen Psychiatric Institute, Leiden, NetherlandsDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University Medical Center, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht, NetherlandsDepartment of Psychosis Research, Rivierduinen Psychiatric Institute, Leiden, NetherlandsDutch Clozapine Collaboration Group, Castricum, NetherlandsMental Health Service Noord-Holland Noord, Alkmaar, NetherlandsDepartment of Psychosis Research, Rivierduinen Psychiatric Institute, Leiden, NetherlandsDutch Clozapine Collaboration Group, Castricum, NetherlandsDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University Medical Center, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht, NetherlandsResearch Department, Institute for Mental Health Care Eindhoven, Eindhoven, NetherlandsDepartment of Neuroscience and Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, NetherlandsDepartment of Psychosis Research, Rivierduinen Psychiatric Institute, Leiden, NetherlandsDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University Medical Center, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht, NetherlandsPurpose: To our knowledge, no study has examined in a structured way the extent of underprescription of clozapine in ambulatory patients with Non-Affective Psychotic Disorder (NAPD). In the Netherlands, psychiatric care for such patients is provided by Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (FACT) teams and by early intervention teams. In 20 FACT teams and 3 early intervention teams we assessed the proportion of patients who: use clozapine (type 1 patients), previously used this drug (type 2), have an unfulfilled indication for this drug, by type of indication (type 3), or were at least markedly psychotic, but had not yet received two adequate treatments with other antipsychotic drugs (type 4). We expected to find major differences between teams. To rule out that these differences are caused by differences in severity of psychopathology, we also calculated the proportions of patients who use clozapine given an indication at any time (number of type 1 patients divided by the sum of type 1, 2, and 3 patients).Materials and methods: The nurse practitioner of each team identified the patients already on clozapine. Next, using a highly-structured decision tree, the nurse practitioner and psychiatrist assessed whether the remaining patients had an indication for this drug. Indications were treatment-resistant positive symptoms, tardive dyskinesia, aggression and suicidality. The severity of positive symptoms was determined using the Clinical Global Impression-Schizophrenia Scale (CGI-SCH).Results: In the participating FACT-teams 2,286 NAPD patients were assessed. The range among teams in proportions was: type 1: 8.8–34.7% (mean: 23.0%), type 2: 0–8.2% (mean: 3.5%), type 3: 1.7–15.6% (mean: 6.9%), type 4: 1.8–16.3% (mean: 8.6%). The range in proportions of patients using this drug given an indication was 49.0–90.9% (mean: 68.8%). These figures were lower in early intervention teams.Conclusions: The proportion of patients in FACT-teams who have an unfulfilled indication for clozapine is 6.9%. There were considerable differences between teams with respect to this proportion. Almost a third of the outpatients had at any time an indication for clozapine. If one takes type 4 patients into account, this proportion may be higher.Registration number: NTR5135 http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/index.asphttps://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00231/fullclozapinepsychotic disordersoutpatient careprescription ratestreatment resistance
spellingShingle Yvonne C. van der Zalm
Yvonne C. van der Zalm
Fabian Termorshuizen
Peter F. Schulte
Peter F. Schulte
Jan P. Bogers
Jan P. Bogers
Machteld Marcelis
Machteld Marcelis
Iris E. Sommer
Jean Paul Selten
Jean Paul Selten
Prescription and Underprescription of Clozapine in Dutch Ambulatory Care
Frontiers in Psychiatry
clozapine
psychotic disorders
outpatient care
prescription rates
treatment resistance
title Prescription and Underprescription of Clozapine in Dutch Ambulatory Care
title_full Prescription and Underprescription of Clozapine in Dutch Ambulatory Care
title_fullStr Prescription and Underprescription of Clozapine in Dutch Ambulatory Care
title_full_unstemmed Prescription and Underprescription of Clozapine in Dutch Ambulatory Care
title_short Prescription and Underprescription of Clozapine in Dutch Ambulatory Care
title_sort prescription and underprescription of clozapine in dutch ambulatory care
topic clozapine
psychotic disorders
outpatient care
prescription rates
treatment resistance
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00231/full
work_keys_str_mv AT yvonnecvanderzalm prescriptionandunderprescriptionofclozapineindutchambulatorycare
AT yvonnecvanderzalm prescriptionandunderprescriptionofclozapineindutchambulatorycare
AT fabiantermorshuizen prescriptionandunderprescriptionofclozapineindutchambulatorycare
AT peterfschulte prescriptionandunderprescriptionofclozapineindutchambulatorycare
AT peterfschulte prescriptionandunderprescriptionofclozapineindutchambulatorycare
AT janpbogers prescriptionandunderprescriptionofclozapineindutchambulatorycare
AT janpbogers prescriptionandunderprescriptionofclozapineindutchambulatorycare
AT machteldmarcelis prescriptionandunderprescriptionofclozapineindutchambulatorycare
AT machteldmarcelis prescriptionandunderprescriptionofclozapineindutchambulatorycare
AT irisesommer prescriptionandunderprescriptionofclozapineindutchambulatorycare
AT jeanpaulselten prescriptionandunderprescriptionofclozapineindutchambulatorycare
AT jeanpaulselten prescriptionandunderprescriptionofclozapineindutchambulatorycare