State of biodiversity documentation in the Philippines: Metadata gaps, taxonomic biases, and spatial biases in the DNA barcode data of animal and plant taxa in the context of species occurrence data

Anthropogenic changes in the natural environment have led to alarming rates of biodiversity loss, resulting in a more urgent need for conservation. Although there is an increasing cognizance of the importance of incorporating biodiversity data into conservation, the accuracy of the inferences genera...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carmela Maria P. Berba, Ambrocio Melvin A. Matias
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PeerJ Inc. 2022-03-01
Series:PeerJ
Subjects:
Online Access:https://peerj.com/articles/13146.pdf
_version_ 1797424842399547392
author Carmela Maria P. Berba
Ambrocio Melvin A. Matias
author_facet Carmela Maria P. Berba
Ambrocio Melvin A. Matias
author_sort Carmela Maria P. Berba
collection DOAJ
description Anthropogenic changes in the natural environment have led to alarming rates of biodiversity loss, resulting in a more urgent need for conservation. Although there is an increasing cognizance of the importance of incorporating biodiversity data into conservation, the accuracy of the inferences generated from these records can be highly impacted by gaps and biases in the data. Because of the Philippines’ status as a biodiversity hotspot, the assessment of potential gaps and biases in biodiversity documentation in the country can be a critical step in the identification of priority research areas for conservation applications. In this study, we systematically assessed biodiversity data on animal and plant taxa found in the Philippines by examining the extent of metadata gaps, taxonomic biases, and spatial biases in DNA barcode data while using species occurrence data as a backdrop of the ‘Philippines’ biodiversity. These barcode and species occurrence datasets were obtained from public databases, namely: GenBank, Barcode of Life Data System and Global Biodiversity Information Facility. We found that much of the barcode data had missing information on either records and publishing, geolocation, or taxonomic metadata, which consequently, can limit the usability of barcode data for further analyses. We also observed that the amount of barcode data can be directly associated with the amount of species occurrence data available for a particular taxonomic group and location–highlighting the potential sampling biases in the barcode data. While the majority of barcode data came from foreign institutions, there has been an increase in local efforts in recent decades. However, much of the contribution to biodiversity documentation only come from institutions based in Luzon.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T08:07:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4b4c08e9504d434b9dd83dca6701d3f0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2167-8359
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T08:07:27Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format Article
series PeerJ
spelling doaj.art-4b4c08e9504d434b9dd83dca6701d3f02023-12-02T23:44:52ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592022-03-0110e1314610.7717/peerj.13146State of biodiversity documentation in the Philippines: Metadata gaps, taxonomic biases, and spatial biases in the DNA barcode data of animal and plant taxa in the context of species occurrence dataCarmela Maria P. BerbaAmbrocio Melvin A. MatiasAnthropogenic changes in the natural environment have led to alarming rates of biodiversity loss, resulting in a more urgent need for conservation. Although there is an increasing cognizance of the importance of incorporating biodiversity data into conservation, the accuracy of the inferences generated from these records can be highly impacted by gaps and biases in the data. Because of the Philippines’ status as a biodiversity hotspot, the assessment of potential gaps and biases in biodiversity documentation in the country can be a critical step in the identification of priority research areas for conservation applications. In this study, we systematically assessed biodiversity data on animal and plant taxa found in the Philippines by examining the extent of metadata gaps, taxonomic biases, and spatial biases in DNA barcode data while using species occurrence data as a backdrop of the ‘Philippines’ biodiversity. These barcode and species occurrence datasets were obtained from public databases, namely: GenBank, Barcode of Life Data System and Global Biodiversity Information Facility. We found that much of the barcode data had missing information on either records and publishing, geolocation, or taxonomic metadata, which consequently, can limit the usability of barcode data for further analyses. We also observed that the amount of barcode data can be directly associated with the amount of species occurrence data available for a particular taxonomic group and location–highlighting the potential sampling biases in the barcode data. While the majority of barcode data came from foreign institutions, there has been an increase in local efforts in recent decades. However, much of the contribution to biodiversity documentation only come from institutions based in Luzon.https://peerj.com/articles/13146.pdfComparative analysisConservationGenetic diversityOnline biodiversity databaseSampling biasesSpatial analysis
spellingShingle Carmela Maria P. Berba
Ambrocio Melvin A. Matias
State of biodiversity documentation in the Philippines: Metadata gaps, taxonomic biases, and spatial biases in the DNA barcode data of animal and plant taxa in the context of species occurrence data
PeerJ
Comparative analysis
Conservation
Genetic diversity
Online biodiversity database
Sampling biases
Spatial analysis
title State of biodiversity documentation in the Philippines: Metadata gaps, taxonomic biases, and spatial biases in the DNA barcode data of animal and plant taxa in the context of species occurrence data
title_full State of biodiversity documentation in the Philippines: Metadata gaps, taxonomic biases, and spatial biases in the DNA barcode data of animal and plant taxa in the context of species occurrence data
title_fullStr State of biodiversity documentation in the Philippines: Metadata gaps, taxonomic biases, and spatial biases in the DNA barcode data of animal and plant taxa in the context of species occurrence data
title_full_unstemmed State of biodiversity documentation in the Philippines: Metadata gaps, taxonomic biases, and spatial biases in the DNA barcode data of animal and plant taxa in the context of species occurrence data
title_short State of biodiversity documentation in the Philippines: Metadata gaps, taxonomic biases, and spatial biases in the DNA barcode data of animal and plant taxa in the context of species occurrence data
title_sort state of biodiversity documentation in the philippines metadata gaps taxonomic biases and spatial biases in the dna barcode data of animal and plant taxa in the context of species occurrence data
topic Comparative analysis
Conservation
Genetic diversity
Online biodiversity database
Sampling biases
Spatial analysis
url https://peerj.com/articles/13146.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT carmelamariapberba stateofbiodiversitydocumentationinthephilippinesmetadatagapstaxonomicbiasesandspatialbiasesinthednabarcodedataofanimalandplanttaxainthecontextofspeciesoccurrencedata
AT ambrociomelvinamatias stateofbiodiversitydocumentationinthephilippinesmetadatagapstaxonomicbiasesandspatialbiasesinthednabarcodedataofanimalandplanttaxainthecontextofspeciesoccurrencedata