Care networks of home-dwelling older adults in the Netherlands: proof of concept of a network typology

Abstract Background Studies on care networks of home-dwelling older adults often focus on network composition. However, looking at network mechanisms (negotiation, navigation and contagion) can be helpful to improve the support generated by the care network. A European study on diabetes patients ide...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wendy Kemper-Koebrugge, Marian Adriaansen, Miranda Laurant, Michel Wensing
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-12-01
Series:BMC Geriatrics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04404-0
_version_ 1797397738909859840
author Wendy Kemper-Koebrugge
Marian Adriaansen
Miranda Laurant
Michel Wensing
author_facet Wendy Kemper-Koebrugge
Marian Adriaansen
Miranda Laurant
Michel Wensing
author_sort Wendy Kemper-Koebrugge
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Studies on care networks of home-dwelling older adults often focus on network composition. However, looking at network mechanisms (negotiation, navigation and contagion) can be helpful to improve the support generated by the care network. A European study on diabetes patients identified network types based on interaction, which can be beneficial (generative, proxy) or detrimental (struggling, avoidant) to support. This study explored whether these network types are present in care networks of home-dwelling older adults in the Netherlands, and how these types manifest in composition or mechanisms. Methods The present study is a cross‐sectional qualitative study of care networks supporting 19 home‐dwelling older adults. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with the older adult and their informal and formal caregivers between March and September 2016. Network composition and mechanisms were abstracted from content analysis of interview transcripts, then network type was determined for each network. Results Three of the 19 networks had only one respondent and were excluded, yielding 16 for analysis: eight proxy networks, three generative networks, two avoidant networks, one struggling network, and two possibly hybrid networks. In the proxy networks, all negotiation and navigation were centralised by the proxy. In generative networks, negotiation was possible if the older adult could reciprocate, and the network supported this. In avoidant networks, informal and formal caregivers had to deal with an older adult who refused support. In the struggling network, the underlying problem could not be addressed. Furthermore, two networks could either be hybrid network types or networks in a transition process from generative to proxy network. Conclusion Our results suggest that the network typology developed in the context of diabetes patients is relevant and mostly replicable in networks of multi-morbid older adults. We found that a care network typology based on mechanisms offered additional information beyond network composition. It also appears that the network type can change over time, but more research is needed to confirm this. This study suggests that interventions in avoidant or struggling networks are difficult. Also, actions of network participants seemed aimed at developing proxy networks. Interventions designed to develop or maintain generative networks seem underused.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T01:15:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4b53cadd2c0a4a278dbc2b6884049b4f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2318
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T01:15:32Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Geriatrics
spelling doaj.art-4b53cadd2c0a4a278dbc2b6884049b4f2023-12-10T12:31:00ZengBMCBMC Geriatrics1471-23182023-12-012311910.1186/s12877-023-04404-0Care networks of home-dwelling older adults in the Netherlands: proof of concept of a network typologyWendy Kemper-Koebrugge0Marian Adriaansen1Miranda Laurant2Michel Wensing3Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ HealthcareHAN University of Applied Sciences School of Health StudiesRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ HealthcareRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ HealthcareAbstract Background Studies on care networks of home-dwelling older adults often focus on network composition. However, looking at network mechanisms (negotiation, navigation and contagion) can be helpful to improve the support generated by the care network. A European study on diabetes patients identified network types based on interaction, which can be beneficial (generative, proxy) or detrimental (struggling, avoidant) to support. This study explored whether these network types are present in care networks of home-dwelling older adults in the Netherlands, and how these types manifest in composition or mechanisms. Methods The present study is a cross‐sectional qualitative study of care networks supporting 19 home‐dwelling older adults. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with the older adult and their informal and formal caregivers between March and September 2016. Network composition and mechanisms were abstracted from content analysis of interview transcripts, then network type was determined for each network. Results Three of the 19 networks had only one respondent and were excluded, yielding 16 for analysis: eight proxy networks, three generative networks, two avoidant networks, one struggling network, and two possibly hybrid networks. In the proxy networks, all negotiation and navigation were centralised by the proxy. In generative networks, negotiation was possible if the older adult could reciprocate, and the network supported this. In avoidant networks, informal and formal caregivers had to deal with an older adult who refused support. In the struggling network, the underlying problem could not be addressed. Furthermore, two networks could either be hybrid network types or networks in a transition process from generative to proxy network. Conclusion Our results suggest that the network typology developed in the context of diabetes patients is relevant and mostly replicable in networks of multi-morbid older adults. We found that a care network typology based on mechanisms offered additional information beyond network composition. It also appears that the network type can change over time, but more research is needed to confirm this. This study suggests that interventions in avoidant or struggling networks are difficult. Also, actions of network participants seemed aimed at developing proxy networks. Interventions designed to develop or maintain generative networks seem underused.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04404-0Older adultCare networkInformal careQualitative methodologiesNetwork typeNetwork mechanisms
spellingShingle Wendy Kemper-Koebrugge
Marian Adriaansen
Miranda Laurant
Michel Wensing
Care networks of home-dwelling older adults in the Netherlands: proof of concept of a network typology
BMC Geriatrics
Older adult
Care network
Informal care
Qualitative methodologies
Network type
Network mechanisms
title Care networks of home-dwelling older adults in the Netherlands: proof of concept of a network typology
title_full Care networks of home-dwelling older adults in the Netherlands: proof of concept of a network typology
title_fullStr Care networks of home-dwelling older adults in the Netherlands: proof of concept of a network typology
title_full_unstemmed Care networks of home-dwelling older adults in the Netherlands: proof of concept of a network typology
title_short Care networks of home-dwelling older adults in the Netherlands: proof of concept of a network typology
title_sort care networks of home dwelling older adults in the netherlands proof of concept of a network typology
topic Older adult
Care network
Informal care
Qualitative methodologies
Network type
Network mechanisms
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04404-0
work_keys_str_mv AT wendykemperkoebrugge carenetworksofhomedwellingolderadultsinthenetherlandsproofofconceptofanetworktypology
AT marianadriaansen carenetworksofhomedwellingolderadultsinthenetherlandsproofofconceptofanetworktypology
AT mirandalaurant carenetworksofhomedwellingolderadultsinthenetherlandsproofofconceptofanetworktypology
AT michelwensing carenetworksofhomedwellingolderadultsinthenetherlandsproofofconceptofanetworktypology