Francisco Suárez on Pain and Touch

In the study the author aims at two main things. First, he points out an (at least) potential doctrinal incoherence in Suárez’s statements concerning the issue of the proper sensible object of touch. While in the context of his treatment of the sense of touch in DA VII, 13-14 Suárez restricts the to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Daniel Heider
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Universidad Pontificia Comillas 2018-05-01
Series:Pensamiento. Revista de Investigación e Información Filosófica
Online Access:https://revistas.upcomillas.es/index.php/pensamiento/article/view/8787
_version_ 1818006943436898304
author Daniel Heider
author_facet Daniel Heider
author_sort Daniel Heider
collection DOAJ
description In the study the author aims at two main things. First, he points out an (at least) potential doctrinal incoherence in Suárez’s statements concerning the issue of the proper sensible object of touch. While in the context of his treatment of the sense of touch in DA VII, 13-14 Suárez restricts the total object of touch to external (tangent) qualities, in DA XI, 2, when treating the issue of emotions, the Jesuit includes also the qualitas dolorifera, i.e., a quality inherent in the percipient’s body. The author states that Suárez’s inconsistence is more urgent if his formulations are compared with those of Francisco de Oviedo. Second, the author indicates that Suárez’s «mixed view of pain», combining both the perceptual and the affective aspects in the single experience of pain, is a kind of theory that can be regarded as an up-to-date position even in the contemporary debate among analytic philosophers.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T05:08:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4b6adf8f8d6a48f78b5114335907da0f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0031-4749
2386-5822
language Spanish
last_indexed 2024-04-14T05:08:19Z
publishDate 2018-05-01
publisher Universidad Pontificia Comillas
record_format Article
series Pensamiento. Revista de Investigación e Información Filosófica
spelling doaj.art-4b6adf8f8d6a48f78b5114335907da0f2022-12-22T02:10:37ZspaUniversidad Pontificia ComillasPensamiento. Revista de Investigación e Información Filosófica0031-47492386-58222018-05-0174279759010.14422/pen.v74.i279.y2018.0048139Francisco Suárez on Pain and TouchDaniel Heider0Universidad del Sur de Bohemia České Budějovice, (República Checa)In the study the author aims at two main things. First, he points out an (at least) potential doctrinal incoherence in Suárez’s statements concerning the issue of the proper sensible object of touch. While in the context of his treatment of the sense of touch in DA VII, 13-14 Suárez restricts the total object of touch to external (tangent) qualities, in DA XI, 2, when treating the issue of emotions, the Jesuit includes also the qualitas dolorifera, i.e., a quality inherent in the percipient’s body. The author states that Suárez’s inconsistence is more urgent if his formulations are compared with those of Francisco de Oviedo. Second, the author indicates that Suárez’s «mixed view of pain», combining both the perceptual and the affective aspects in the single experience of pain, is a kind of theory that can be regarded as an up-to-date position even in the contemporary debate among analytic philosophers.https://revistas.upcomillas.es/index.php/pensamiento/article/view/8787
spellingShingle Daniel Heider
Francisco Suárez on Pain and Touch
Pensamiento. Revista de Investigación e Información Filosófica
title Francisco Suárez on Pain and Touch
title_full Francisco Suárez on Pain and Touch
title_fullStr Francisco Suárez on Pain and Touch
title_full_unstemmed Francisco Suárez on Pain and Touch
title_short Francisco Suárez on Pain and Touch
title_sort francisco suarez on pain and touch
url https://revistas.upcomillas.es/index.php/pensamiento/article/view/8787
work_keys_str_mv AT danielheider franciscosuarezonpainandtouch