Velocity neurons improve performance more than goal or position neurons do in a simulated closed-loop BCI arm-reaching task.

Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) that convert brain-recorded neural signals into intended movement commands could eventually be combined with Functional Electrical Stimulation to allow individuals with Spinal Cord Injury to regain effective and intuitive control of their paralyzed limbs. To accelera...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: James Yu-Chang Liao, Robert F Kirsch
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fncom.2015.00084/full
_version_ 1818619271979204608
author James Yu-Chang Liao
James Yu-Chang Liao
Robert F Kirsch
Robert F Kirsch
author_facet James Yu-Chang Liao
James Yu-Chang Liao
Robert F Kirsch
Robert F Kirsch
author_sort James Yu-Chang Liao
collection DOAJ
description Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) that convert brain-recorded neural signals into intended movement commands could eventually be combined with Functional Electrical Stimulation to allow individuals with Spinal Cord Injury to regain effective and intuitive control of their paralyzed limbs. To accelerate the development of such an approach, we developed a model of closed-loop BCI control of arm movements that (1) generates realistic arm movements (based on experimentally measured, visually-guided movements with real-time error correction), (2) simulates cortical neurons with firing properties consistent with literature reports, and (3) decodes intended movements from the noisy neural ensemble. With this model we explored (1) the relative utility of neurons tuned for different movement parameters (position, velocity, and goal) and (2) the utility of recording from larger numbers of neurons – critical issues for technology development and for determining appropriate brain areas for recording. We simulated arm movements that could be practically restored to individuals with severe paralysis, i.e., movements from an armrest to a volume in front of the person. Performance was evaluated by calculating the smallest movement endpoint target radius within which the decoded cursor position could dwell for one second. Our results show that goal, position, and velocity neurons all contribute to improve performance. However, velocity neurons enabled smaller targets to be reached in shorter amounts of time than goal or position neurons. Increasing the number of neurons also improved performance, although performance saturated at 30-50 neurons for most neuron types. Overall, our work presents a closed-loop BCI simulator that models error corrections and the firing properties of various movement-related neurons that can be easily modified to incorporate different neural properties. We anticipate that this kind of tool will be important for development of future BCIs.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T17:34:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4b739cff5ebb4f579ce9367a09d47496
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-5188
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T17:34:50Z
publishDate 2015-07-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-4b739cff5ebb4f579ce9367a09d474962022-12-21T22:22:49ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience1662-51882015-07-01910.3389/fncom.2015.00084141286Velocity neurons improve performance more than goal or position neurons do in a simulated closed-loop BCI arm-reaching task.James Yu-Chang Liao0James Yu-Chang Liao1Robert F Kirsch2Robert F Kirsch3Case Western Reserve UniversityCleveland Functional Electrical Stimulation CenterCase Western Reserve UniversityCleveland Functional Electrical Stimulation CenterBrain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) that convert brain-recorded neural signals into intended movement commands could eventually be combined with Functional Electrical Stimulation to allow individuals with Spinal Cord Injury to regain effective and intuitive control of their paralyzed limbs. To accelerate the development of such an approach, we developed a model of closed-loop BCI control of arm movements that (1) generates realistic arm movements (based on experimentally measured, visually-guided movements with real-time error correction), (2) simulates cortical neurons with firing properties consistent with literature reports, and (3) decodes intended movements from the noisy neural ensemble. With this model we explored (1) the relative utility of neurons tuned for different movement parameters (position, velocity, and goal) and (2) the utility of recording from larger numbers of neurons – critical issues for technology development and for determining appropriate brain areas for recording. We simulated arm movements that could be practically restored to individuals with severe paralysis, i.e., movements from an armrest to a volume in front of the person. Performance was evaluated by calculating the smallest movement endpoint target radius within which the decoded cursor position could dwell for one second. Our results show that goal, position, and velocity neurons all contribute to improve performance. However, velocity neurons enabled smaller targets to be reached in shorter amounts of time than goal or position neurons. Increasing the number of neurons also improved performance, although performance saturated at 30-50 neurons for most neuron types. Overall, our work presents a closed-loop BCI simulator that models error corrections and the firing properties of various movement-related neurons that can be easily modified to incorporate different neural properties. We anticipate that this kind of tool will be important for development of future BCIs.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fncom.2015.00084/fullMotor CortexDecodingparietal cortexPositionBrain computer interface (BCI)simulator
spellingShingle James Yu-Chang Liao
James Yu-Chang Liao
Robert F Kirsch
Robert F Kirsch
Velocity neurons improve performance more than goal or position neurons do in a simulated closed-loop BCI arm-reaching task.
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
Motor Cortex
Decoding
parietal cortex
Position
Brain computer interface (BCI)
simulator
title Velocity neurons improve performance more than goal or position neurons do in a simulated closed-loop BCI arm-reaching task.
title_full Velocity neurons improve performance more than goal or position neurons do in a simulated closed-loop BCI arm-reaching task.
title_fullStr Velocity neurons improve performance more than goal or position neurons do in a simulated closed-loop BCI arm-reaching task.
title_full_unstemmed Velocity neurons improve performance more than goal or position neurons do in a simulated closed-loop BCI arm-reaching task.
title_short Velocity neurons improve performance more than goal or position neurons do in a simulated closed-loop BCI arm-reaching task.
title_sort velocity neurons improve performance more than goal or position neurons do in a simulated closed loop bci arm reaching task
topic Motor Cortex
Decoding
parietal cortex
Position
Brain computer interface (BCI)
simulator
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fncom.2015.00084/full
work_keys_str_mv AT jamesyuchangliao velocityneuronsimproveperformancemorethangoalorpositionneuronsdoinasimulatedclosedloopbciarmreachingtask
AT jamesyuchangliao velocityneuronsimproveperformancemorethangoalorpositionneuronsdoinasimulatedclosedloopbciarmreachingtask
AT robertfkirsch velocityneuronsimproveperformancemorethangoalorpositionneuronsdoinasimulatedclosedloopbciarmreachingtask
AT robertfkirsch velocityneuronsimproveperformancemorethangoalorpositionneuronsdoinasimulatedclosedloopbciarmreachingtask