Don’t Discount Societal Value in Cost-Effectiveness; Comment on “Priority Setting for Universal Health Coverage: We Need Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes, Not Just More Evidence on Cost-Effectiveness”
As healthcare resources become increasingly scarce due to growing demand and stagnating budgets, the need for effective priority setting and resource allocation will become ever more critical to providing sustainable care to patients. While societal values should certainly play a part in guiding the...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Kerman University of Medical Sciences
2017-09-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Health Policy and Management |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.ijhpm.com/article_3308_9d5fb8e62fccf52582e862d1d1d4cc80.pdf |
_version_ | 1818964661411774464 |
---|---|
author | William Hall |
author_facet | William Hall |
author_sort | William Hall |
collection | DOAJ |
description | As healthcare resources become increasingly scarce due to growing demand and stagnating budgets, the need for effective priority setting and resource allocation will become ever more critical to providing sustainable care to patients. While societal values should certainly play a part in guiding these processes, the methodology used to capture these values need not necessarily be limited to multi-criterion decision analysis (MCDA)-based processes including ‘evidence-informed deliberative processes.’ However, if decision-makers intend to not only incorporates the values of the public they serve into decisions but have the decisions enacted as well, consideration should be given to more direct involvement of stakeholders. Based on the examples provided by Baltussen et al, MCDA-based processes like ‘evidence-informed deliberative processes’ could be one way of achieving this laudable goal. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-20T13:04:40Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-4b7556272fe44c57a9677e409e5b462b |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2322-5939 2322-5939 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-20T13:04:40Z |
publishDate | 2017-09-01 |
publisher | Kerman University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | Article |
series | International Journal of Health Policy and Management |
spelling | doaj.art-4b7556272fe44c57a9677e409e5b462b2022-12-21T19:39:48ZengKerman University of Medical SciencesInternational Journal of Health Policy and Management2322-59392322-59392017-09-016954354510.15171/IJHPM.2017.03Don’t Discount Societal Value in Cost-Effectiveness; Comment on “Priority Setting for Universal Health Coverage: We Need Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes, Not Just More Evidence on Cost-Effectiveness”William Hall0Centre for Clinical Epidemiology & Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, CanadaAs healthcare resources become increasingly scarce due to growing demand and stagnating budgets, the need for effective priority setting and resource allocation will become ever more critical to providing sustainable care to patients. While societal values should certainly play a part in guiding these processes, the methodology used to capture these values need not necessarily be limited to multi-criterion decision analysis (MCDA)-based processes including ‘evidence-informed deliberative processes.’ However, if decision-makers intend to not only incorporates the values of the public they serve into decisions but have the decisions enacted as well, consideration should be given to more direct involvement of stakeholders. Based on the examples provided by Baltussen et al, MCDA-based processes like ‘evidence-informed deliberative processes’ could be one way of achieving this laudable goal.http://www.ijhpm.com/article_3308_9d5fb8e62fccf52582e862d1d1d4cc80.pdfCost-EffectivenessPriority SettingResource AllocationMulti-Criterion Decision Analysis (MCDA)Deliberative Processes |
spellingShingle | William Hall Don’t Discount Societal Value in Cost-Effectiveness; Comment on “Priority Setting for Universal Health Coverage: We Need Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes, Not Just More Evidence on Cost-Effectiveness” International Journal of Health Policy and Management Cost-Effectiveness Priority Setting Resource Allocation Multi-Criterion Decision Analysis (MCDA) Deliberative Processes |
title | Don’t Discount Societal Value in Cost-Effectiveness; Comment on “Priority Setting for Universal Health Coverage: We Need Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes, Not Just More Evidence on Cost-Effectiveness” |
title_full | Don’t Discount Societal Value in Cost-Effectiveness; Comment on “Priority Setting for Universal Health Coverage: We Need Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes, Not Just More Evidence on Cost-Effectiveness” |
title_fullStr | Don’t Discount Societal Value in Cost-Effectiveness; Comment on “Priority Setting for Universal Health Coverage: We Need Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes, Not Just More Evidence on Cost-Effectiveness” |
title_full_unstemmed | Don’t Discount Societal Value in Cost-Effectiveness; Comment on “Priority Setting for Universal Health Coverage: We Need Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes, Not Just More Evidence on Cost-Effectiveness” |
title_short | Don’t Discount Societal Value in Cost-Effectiveness; Comment on “Priority Setting for Universal Health Coverage: We Need Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes, Not Just More Evidence on Cost-Effectiveness” |
title_sort | don t discount societal value in cost effectiveness comment on priority setting for universal health coverage we need evidence informed deliberative processes not just more evidence on cost effectiveness |
topic | Cost-Effectiveness Priority Setting Resource Allocation Multi-Criterion Decision Analysis (MCDA) Deliberative Processes |
url | http://www.ijhpm.com/article_3308_9d5fb8e62fccf52582e862d1d1d4cc80.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT williamhall dontdiscountsocietalvalueincosteffectivenesscommentonprioritysettingforuniversalhealthcoverageweneedevidenceinformeddeliberativeprocessesnotjustmoreevidenceoncosteffectiveness |