Don’t Discount Societal Value in Cost-Effectiveness; Comment on “Priority Setting for Universal Health Coverage: We Need Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes, Not Just More Evidence on Cost-Effectiveness”

As healthcare resources become increasingly scarce due to growing demand and stagnating budgets, the need for effective priority setting and resource allocation will become ever more critical to providing sustainable care to patients. While societal values should certainly play a part in guiding the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: William Hall
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2017-09-01
Series:International Journal of Health Policy and Management
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijhpm.com/article_3308_9d5fb8e62fccf52582e862d1d1d4cc80.pdf
_version_ 1818964661411774464
author William Hall
author_facet William Hall
author_sort William Hall
collection DOAJ
description As healthcare resources become increasingly scarce due to growing demand and stagnating budgets, the need for effective priority setting and resource allocation will become ever more critical to providing sustainable care to patients. While societal values should certainly play a part in guiding these processes, the methodology used to capture these values need not necessarily be limited to multi-criterion decision analysis (MCDA)-based processes including ‘evidence-informed deliberative processes.’ However, if decision-makers intend to not only incorporates the values of the public they serve into decisions but have the decisions enacted as well, consideration should be given to more direct involvement of stakeholders. Based on the examples provided by Baltussen et al, MCDA-based processes like ‘evidence-informed deliberative processes’ could be one way of achieving this laudable goal.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T13:04:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4b7556272fe44c57a9677e409e5b462b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2322-5939
2322-5939
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T13:04:40Z
publishDate 2017-09-01
publisher Kerman University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series International Journal of Health Policy and Management
spelling doaj.art-4b7556272fe44c57a9677e409e5b462b2022-12-21T19:39:48ZengKerman University of Medical SciencesInternational Journal of Health Policy and Management2322-59392322-59392017-09-016954354510.15171/IJHPM.2017.03Don’t Discount Societal Value in Cost-Effectiveness; Comment on “Priority Setting for Universal Health Coverage: We Need Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes, Not Just More Evidence on Cost-Effectiveness”William Hall0Centre for Clinical Epidemiology & Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, CanadaAs healthcare resources become increasingly scarce due to growing demand and stagnating budgets, the need for effective priority setting and resource allocation will become ever more critical to providing sustainable care to patients. While societal values should certainly play a part in guiding these processes, the methodology used to capture these values need not necessarily be limited to multi-criterion decision analysis (MCDA)-based processes including ‘evidence-informed deliberative processes.’ However, if decision-makers intend to not only incorporates the values of the public they serve into decisions but have the decisions enacted as well, consideration should be given to more direct involvement of stakeholders. Based on the examples provided by Baltussen et al, MCDA-based processes like ‘evidence-informed deliberative processes’ could be one way of achieving this laudable goal.http://www.ijhpm.com/article_3308_9d5fb8e62fccf52582e862d1d1d4cc80.pdfCost-EffectivenessPriority SettingResource AllocationMulti-Criterion Decision Analysis (MCDA)Deliberative Processes
spellingShingle William Hall
Don’t Discount Societal Value in Cost-Effectiveness; Comment on “Priority Setting for Universal Health Coverage: We Need Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes, Not Just More Evidence on Cost-Effectiveness”
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
Cost-Effectiveness
Priority Setting
Resource Allocation
Multi-Criterion Decision Analysis (MCDA)
Deliberative Processes
title Don’t Discount Societal Value in Cost-Effectiveness; Comment on “Priority Setting for Universal Health Coverage: We Need Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes, Not Just More Evidence on Cost-Effectiveness”
title_full Don’t Discount Societal Value in Cost-Effectiveness; Comment on “Priority Setting for Universal Health Coverage: We Need Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes, Not Just More Evidence on Cost-Effectiveness”
title_fullStr Don’t Discount Societal Value in Cost-Effectiveness; Comment on “Priority Setting for Universal Health Coverage: We Need Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes, Not Just More Evidence on Cost-Effectiveness”
title_full_unstemmed Don’t Discount Societal Value in Cost-Effectiveness; Comment on “Priority Setting for Universal Health Coverage: We Need Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes, Not Just More Evidence on Cost-Effectiveness”
title_short Don’t Discount Societal Value in Cost-Effectiveness; Comment on “Priority Setting for Universal Health Coverage: We Need Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes, Not Just More Evidence on Cost-Effectiveness”
title_sort don t discount societal value in cost effectiveness comment on priority setting for universal health coverage we need evidence informed deliberative processes not just more evidence on cost effectiveness
topic Cost-Effectiveness
Priority Setting
Resource Allocation
Multi-Criterion Decision Analysis (MCDA)
Deliberative Processes
url http://www.ijhpm.com/article_3308_9d5fb8e62fccf52582e862d1d1d4cc80.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT williamhall dontdiscountsocietalvalueincosteffectivenesscommentonprioritysettingforuniversalhealthcoverageweneedevidenceinformeddeliberativeprocessesnotjustmoreevidenceoncosteffectiveness