Modified Water Displacement Method and its Use for Determination of Bulk Density of Porous Materials

In this research work, a modified water displacement method (MWDM) was designed and used in addition to geometry method (GM) to measure the bulk volume and then determine the bulk density values of asbestos ceiling board, cardboard paper, chalk, clay (compacted) and gypsum board that have been sun-d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Okechukwu Ebuka Agbasi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: UIR Press 2019-02-01
Series:Journal of Renewable Energy and Mechanics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.uir.ac.id/index.php/REM/article/view/2292/1539
_version_ 1818978588406317056
author Okechukwu Ebuka Agbasi
author_facet Okechukwu Ebuka Agbasi
author_sort Okechukwu Ebuka Agbasi
collection DOAJ
description In this research work, a modified water displacement method (MWDM) was designed and used in addition to geometry method (GM) to measure the bulk volume and then determine the bulk density values of asbestos ceiling board, cardboard paper, chalk, clay (compacted) and gypsum board that have been sun-dried to constant weight. The mean bulk densities determined by both methods were compared with the reference bulk density values of the same porous materials obtained in this work using standard test procedure in accordance with ASTM D6683-14. It was observed that, for all the tested porous materials, the percentage error in the mean bulk density values ranged from 2.3% to 49.6% when using GM and 0.9% to 5.7% by using the MWDM. Also, at 0.05 level of significance with a degree of freedom of 3, correlation coefficients of 0.7430 and 0.9955 were obtained in the cases of GM and the MWDM respectively. Again, all other analyses performed similarly revealed that the mean bulk densities obtained by the MWDM only were in close agreement with their corresponding reference values, thereby implying that apart from being cost-effective, the MWDM is better than GM in terms of accuracy, reliability, and validity. More importantly, it is noteworthy that even if the glass cylinder available for use is ungraduated, this MWDM can be employed to obtain accurate, reliable and valid bulk density values of porous materials in order to enhance thorough physical characterization, proper selection and suitable applications of such materials.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T16:46:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4b9b836156524748a660626b58a680a0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2714-6219
2614-8315
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T16:46:01Z
publishDate 2019-02-01
publisher UIR Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Renewable Energy and Mechanics
spelling doaj.art-4b9b836156524748a660626b58a680a02022-12-21T19:32:56ZengUIR PressJournal of Renewable Energy and Mechanics2714-62192614-83152019-02-0121116https://doi.org/10.25299/rem.2019.vol1(01).2292Modified Water Displacement Method and its Use for Determination of Bulk Density of Porous MaterialsOkechukwu Ebuka Agbasi 0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5649-0107Micheal Okpara University of Agriculture, UmudikeIn this research work, a modified water displacement method (MWDM) was designed and used in addition to geometry method (GM) to measure the bulk volume and then determine the bulk density values of asbestos ceiling board, cardboard paper, chalk, clay (compacted) and gypsum board that have been sun-dried to constant weight. The mean bulk densities determined by both methods were compared with the reference bulk density values of the same porous materials obtained in this work using standard test procedure in accordance with ASTM D6683-14. It was observed that, for all the tested porous materials, the percentage error in the mean bulk density values ranged from 2.3% to 49.6% when using GM and 0.9% to 5.7% by using the MWDM. Also, at 0.05 level of significance with a degree of freedom of 3, correlation coefficients of 0.7430 and 0.9955 were obtained in the cases of GM and the MWDM respectively. Again, all other analyses performed similarly revealed that the mean bulk densities obtained by the MWDM only were in close agreement with their corresponding reference values, thereby implying that apart from being cost-effective, the MWDM is better than GM in terms of accuracy, reliability, and validity. More importantly, it is noteworthy that even if the glass cylinder available for use is ungraduated, this MWDM can be employed to obtain accurate, reliable and valid bulk density values of porous materials in order to enhance thorough physical characterization, proper selection and suitable applications of such materials.https://journal.uir.ac.id/index.php/REM/article/view/2292/1539porous materialsgeometrywater displacementbulk densitymaterial characterization
spellingShingle Okechukwu Ebuka Agbasi
Modified Water Displacement Method and its Use for Determination of Bulk Density of Porous Materials
Journal of Renewable Energy and Mechanics
porous materials
geometry
water displacement
bulk density
material characterization
title Modified Water Displacement Method and its Use for Determination of Bulk Density of Porous Materials
title_full Modified Water Displacement Method and its Use for Determination of Bulk Density of Porous Materials
title_fullStr Modified Water Displacement Method and its Use for Determination of Bulk Density of Porous Materials
title_full_unstemmed Modified Water Displacement Method and its Use for Determination of Bulk Density of Porous Materials
title_short Modified Water Displacement Method and its Use for Determination of Bulk Density of Porous Materials
title_sort modified water displacement method and its use for determination of bulk density of porous materials
topic porous materials
geometry
water displacement
bulk density
material characterization
url https://journal.uir.ac.id/index.php/REM/article/view/2292/1539
work_keys_str_mv AT okechukwuebukaagbasi modifiedwaterdisplacementmethodanditsusefordeterminationofbulkdensityofporousmaterials