Managing borders during public health emergencies of international concern: a proposed typology of cross-border health measures

Abstract Background The near universal adoption of cross-border health measures during the COVID-19 pandemic worldwide has prompted significant debate about their effectiveness and compliance with international law. The number of measures used, and the range of measures applied, have far exceeded pr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kelley Lee, Karen A. Grépin, Catherine Worsnop, Summer Marion, Julianne Piper, Mingqi Song
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-06-01
Series:Globalization and Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-021-00709-0
_version_ 1819001388389105664
author Kelley Lee
Karen A. Grépin
Catherine Worsnop
Summer Marion
Julianne Piper
Mingqi Song
author_facet Kelley Lee
Karen A. Grépin
Catherine Worsnop
Summer Marion
Julianne Piper
Mingqi Song
author_sort Kelley Lee
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The near universal adoption of cross-border health measures during the COVID-19 pandemic worldwide has prompted significant debate about their effectiveness and compliance with international law. The number of measures used, and the range of measures applied, have far exceeded previous public health emergencies of international concern. However, efforts to advance research, policy and practice to support their effective use has been hindered by a lack of clear and consistent definition. Results Based on a review of existing datasets for cross-border health measures, such as the Oxford Coronavirus Government Response Tracker and World Health Organization Public Health and Social Measures, along with analysis of secondary and grey literature, we propose six categories to define measures more clearly and consistently – policy goal, type of movement (travel and trade), adopted by public or private sector, level of jurisdiction applied, stage of journey, and degree of restrictiveness. These categories are then brought together into a proposed typology that can support research with generalizable findings and comparative analyses across jurisdictions. Addressing the current gaps in evidence about travel measures, including how different jurisdictions apply such measures with varying effects, in turn, enhances the potential for evidence-informed decision-making based on fuller understanding of policy trade-offs and externalities. Finally, through the adoption of standardized terminology and creation of an agreed evidentiary base recognized across jurisdictions, the typology can support efforts to strengthen coordinated global responses to outbreaks and inform future efforts to revise the WHO International Health Regulations (2005). Conclusions The widespread use of cross-border health measures during the COVID-19 pandemic has prompted significant reflection on available evidence, previous practice and existing legal frameworks. The typology put forth in this paper aims to provide a starting point for strengthening research, policy and practice.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T22:48:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4bbc4a6f18e148f99ea9aa32f29bdb47
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1744-8603
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T22:48:25Z
publishDate 2021-06-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Globalization and Health
spelling doaj.art-4bbc4a6f18e148f99ea9aa32f29bdb472022-12-21T19:24:19ZengBMCGlobalization and Health1744-86032021-06-0117111910.1186/s12992-021-00709-0Managing borders during public health emergencies of international concern: a proposed typology of cross-border health measuresKelley Lee0Karen A. Grépin1Catherine Worsnop2Summer Marion3Julianne Piper4Mingqi Song5Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser UniversitySchool of Public Health, University of Hong KongSchool of Public Policy, University of MarylandSchool of Public Policy, University of MarylandFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser UniversitySchool of Public Health, University of Hong KongAbstract Background The near universal adoption of cross-border health measures during the COVID-19 pandemic worldwide has prompted significant debate about their effectiveness and compliance with international law. The number of measures used, and the range of measures applied, have far exceeded previous public health emergencies of international concern. However, efforts to advance research, policy and practice to support their effective use has been hindered by a lack of clear and consistent definition. Results Based on a review of existing datasets for cross-border health measures, such as the Oxford Coronavirus Government Response Tracker and World Health Organization Public Health and Social Measures, along with analysis of secondary and grey literature, we propose six categories to define measures more clearly and consistently – policy goal, type of movement (travel and trade), adopted by public or private sector, level of jurisdiction applied, stage of journey, and degree of restrictiveness. These categories are then brought together into a proposed typology that can support research with generalizable findings and comparative analyses across jurisdictions. Addressing the current gaps in evidence about travel measures, including how different jurisdictions apply such measures with varying effects, in turn, enhances the potential for evidence-informed decision-making based on fuller understanding of policy trade-offs and externalities. Finally, through the adoption of standardized terminology and creation of an agreed evidentiary base recognized across jurisdictions, the typology can support efforts to strengthen coordinated global responses to outbreaks and inform future efforts to revise the WHO International Health Regulations (2005). Conclusions The widespread use of cross-border health measures during the COVID-19 pandemic has prompted significant reflection on available evidence, previous practice and existing legal frameworks. The typology put forth in this paper aims to provide a starting point for strengthening research, policy and practice.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-021-00709-0COVID-19Cross-border health measuresBorder managementTravel measuresTrade measuresInternational Health Regulations
spellingShingle Kelley Lee
Karen A. Grépin
Catherine Worsnop
Summer Marion
Julianne Piper
Mingqi Song
Managing borders during public health emergencies of international concern: a proposed typology of cross-border health measures
Globalization and Health
COVID-19
Cross-border health measures
Border management
Travel measures
Trade measures
International Health Regulations
title Managing borders during public health emergencies of international concern: a proposed typology of cross-border health measures
title_full Managing borders during public health emergencies of international concern: a proposed typology of cross-border health measures
title_fullStr Managing borders during public health emergencies of international concern: a proposed typology of cross-border health measures
title_full_unstemmed Managing borders during public health emergencies of international concern: a proposed typology of cross-border health measures
title_short Managing borders during public health emergencies of international concern: a proposed typology of cross-border health measures
title_sort managing borders during public health emergencies of international concern a proposed typology of cross border health measures
topic COVID-19
Cross-border health measures
Border management
Travel measures
Trade measures
International Health Regulations
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-021-00709-0
work_keys_str_mv AT kelleylee managingbordersduringpublichealthemergenciesofinternationalconcernaproposedtypologyofcrossborderhealthmeasures
AT karenagrepin managingbordersduringpublichealthemergenciesofinternationalconcernaproposedtypologyofcrossborderhealthmeasures
AT catherineworsnop managingbordersduringpublichealthemergenciesofinternationalconcernaproposedtypologyofcrossborderhealthmeasures
AT summermarion managingbordersduringpublichealthemergenciesofinternationalconcernaproposedtypologyofcrossborderhealthmeasures
AT juliannepiper managingbordersduringpublichealthemergenciesofinternationalconcernaproposedtypologyofcrossborderhealthmeasures
AT mingqisong managingbordersduringpublichealthemergenciesofinternationalconcernaproposedtypologyofcrossborderhealthmeasures