Fetal size classified using gestational days rather than gestational weeks improves correlation with stillbirth risk: A statewide population study.

<h4>Objective</h4>Many growth charts provide single centile cutoffs for each week of gestation, yet fetuses gain weight throughout the week. We aimed to assess whether using a single centile per week distorts the proportion of infants classified as small and their risk of stillbirth acro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Natasha L Pritchard, Stephen Tong, Susan P Walker, Anthea C Lindquist
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2022-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271538
_version_ 1811188446464573440
author Natasha L Pritchard
Stephen Tong
Susan P Walker
Anthea C Lindquist
author_facet Natasha L Pritchard
Stephen Tong
Susan P Walker
Anthea C Lindquist
author_sort Natasha L Pritchard
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Objective</h4>Many growth charts provide single centile cutoffs for each week of gestation, yet fetuses gain weight throughout the week. We aimed to assess whether using a single centile per week distorts the proportion of infants classified as small and their risk of stillbirth across the week.<h4>Design</h4>Retrospective cohort study.<h4>Setting</h4>Victoria, Australia.<h4>Population</h4>Singleton, non-anomalous infants born from 2005-2015 (529,261).<h4>Methods</h4>We applied growth charts to identify small-for-gestational-age (SGA) fetuses on week-based charts (single centile per gestational week) and day-based charts (centile per gestational day).<h4>Main outcome measures</h4>Proportions <10th centile by each chart, and stillbirth risk amongst SGA infants.<h4>Results</h4>Using week-based charts, 12.1% of infants born on the first day of a gestational week were SGA, but only 7.8% on the final day; ie. an infant born at the end of the week was 44% less likely to be classed as SGA (p<0.0001). The relative risk of stillbirth amongst SGA infants born on the final day of the week compared with the first was 1.47 (95%CI 1.09-2.00, p = 0.01). Using day charts, SGA proportions were similar and stillbirth risk equal between the beginning and end of the week (9.5% vs 9.9%).<h4>Conclusions</h4>Growth standards using a single cutoff for a gestational week overestimate the proportion of infants that are small at the beginning of the week and underestimate the proportion at the end. This distorts the risk of stillbirth amongst SGA infants based on when in the week an infant is born. Day-based charts should be used.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T14:18:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4bc352151556435fbf1f0fd1e344f853
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T14:18:54Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-4bc352151556435fbf1f0fd1e344f8532022-12-22T04:19:07ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032022-01-01178e027153810.1371/journal.pone.0271538Fetal size classified using gestational days rather than gestational weeks improves correlation with stillbirth risk: A statewide population study.Natasha L PritchardStephen TongSusan P WalkerAnthea C Lindquist<h4>Objective</h4>Many growth charts provide single centile cutoffs for each week of gestation, yet fetuses gain weight throughout the week. We aimed to assess whether using a single centile per week distorts the proportion of infants classified as small and their risk of stillbirth across the week.<h4>Design</h4>Retrospective cohort study.<h4>Setting</h4>Victoria, Australia.<h4>Population</h4>Singleton, non-anomalous infants born from 2005-2015 (529,261).<h4>Methods</h4>We applied growth charts to identify small-for-gestational-age (SGA) fetuses on week-based charts (single centile per gestational week) and day-based charts (centile per gestational day).<h4>Main outcome measures</h4>Proportions <10th centile by each chart, and stillbirth risk amongst SGA infants.<h4>Results</h4>Using week-based charts, 12.1% of infants born on the first day of a gestational week were SGA, but only 7.8% on the final day; ie. an infant born at the end of the week was 44% less likely to be classed as SGA (p<0.0001). The relative risk of stillbirth amongst SGA infants born on the final day of the week compared with the first was 1.47 (95%CI 1.09-2.00, p = 0.01). Using day charts, SGA proportions were similar and stillbirth risk equal between the beginning and end of the week (9.5% vs 9.9%).<h4>Conclusions</h4>Growth standards using a single cutoff for a gestational week overestimate the proportion of infants that are small at the beginning of the week and underestimate the proportion at the end. This distorts the risk of stillbirth amongst SGA infants based on when in the week an infant is born. Day-based charts should be used.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271538
spellingShingle Natasha L Pritchard
Stephen Tong
Susan P Walker
Anthea C Lindquist
Fetal size classified using gestational days rather than gestational weeks improves correlation with stillbirth risk: A statewide population study.
PLoS ONE
title Fetal size classified using gestational days rather than gestational weeks improves correlation with stillbirth risk: A statewide population study.
title_full Fetal size classified using gestational days rather than gestational weeks improves correlation with stillbirth risk: A statewide population study.
title_fullStr Fetal size classified using gestational days rather than gestational weeks improves correlation with stillbirth risk: A statewide population study.
title_full_unstemmed Fetal size classified using gestational days rather than gestational weeks improves correlation with stillbirth risk: A statewide population study.
title_short Fetal size classified using gestational days rather than gestational weeks improves correlation with stillbirth risk: A statewide population study.
title_sort fetal size classified using gestational days rather than gestational weeks improves correlation with stillbirth risk a statewide population study
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271538
work_keys_str_mv AT natashalpritchard fetalsizeclassifiedusinggestationaldaysratherthangestationalweeksimprovescorrelationwithstillbirthriskastatewidepopulationstudy
AT stephentong fetalsizeclassifiedusinggestationaldaysratherthangestationalweeksimprovescorrelationwithstillbirthriskastatewidepopulationstudy
AT susanpwalker fetalsizeclassifiedusinggestationaldaysratherthangestationalweeksimprovescorrelationwithstillbirthriskastatewidepopulationstudy
AT antheaclindquist fetalsizeclassifiedusinggestationaldaysratherthangestationalweeksimprovescorrelationwithstillbirthriskastatewidepopulationstudy