Mobile heterotopia: movement, circulation and the function of the university

This paper explores the function of the university through the lens of mobility as seen from a South African perspective. Understanding the role of the university as one that requires the movement and circulation of academic bodies in the form of students and staff, and bodies of academic knowledge...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bradley Rink
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of the Western Cape, Centre for Humanities Research and the History Department
Series:Kronos
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0259-01902017000100009&lng=en&tlng=en
_version_ 1811204035653402624
author Bradley Rink
author_facet Bradley Rink
author_sort Bradley Rink
collection DOAJ
description This paper explores the function of the university through the lens of mobility as seen from a South African perspective. Understanding the role of the university as one that requires the movement and circulation of academic bodies in the form of students and staff, and bodies of academic knowledge in the form of teaching, research and academic content, I use a theoretical framework from the interdisciplinary field of mobilities in order to understand the role of movement in the university and to highlight what is ruptured and catalysed by frictions enacted through power geometry, austerity and disruption. Sighted from the perspective of the University of the Western Cape in South Africa, this paper poses a series of provocations that reveal the obligations of presence that comprise the production and transfer of knowledge in the twenty-first-century university. I discuss how disruption and austerity, amongst other embedded mobility limitations, impact on the multiple/intersecting universes of the university; how the austere and disrupted university influences our engagement at various scales from local to global; and, finally, how disruption and austerity act to fix academic bodies in place even as they may allow virtual mobility to replace the face-to-face engagement that is the hallmark of the academic project. This paper demonstrates the critical role of mobility in the institution of the university and concludes that the university is a form of Foucauldian heterotopia mobilising diverse academic bodies and bodies of knowledge.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T03:04:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4bca765e0ea34011828a66f059ef5894
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2309-9585
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T03:04:44Z
publisher University of the Western Cape, Centre for Humanities Research and the History Department
record_format Article
series Kronos
spelling doaj.art-4bca765e0ea34011828a66f059ef58942022-12-22T03:50:32ZengUniversity of the Western Cape, Centre for Humanities Research and the History DepartmentKronos2309-958543113715110.17159/2309-9585/2017/v43a9S0259-01902017000100009Mobile heterotopia: movement, circulation and the function of the universityBradley Rink0University of the Western CapeThis paper explores the function of the university through the lens of mobility as seen from a South African perspective. Understanding the role of the university as one that requires the movement and circulation of academic bodies in the form of students and staff, and bodies of academic knowledge in the form of teaching, research and academic content, I use a theoretical framework from the interdisciplinary field of mobilities in order to understand the role of movement in the university and to highlight what is ruptured and catalysed by frictions enacted through power geometry, austerity and disruption. Sighted from the perspective of the University of the Western Cape in South Africa, this paper poses a series of provocations that reveal the obligations of presence that comprise the production and transfer of knowledge in the twenty-first-century university. I discuss how disruption and austerity, amongst other embedded mobility limitations, impact on the multiple/intersecting universes of the university; how the austere and disrupted university influences our engagement at various scales from local to global; and, finally, how disruption and austerity act to fix academic bodies in place even as they may allow virtual mobility to replace the face-to-face engagement that is the hallmark of the academic project. This paper demonstrates the critical role of mobility in the institution of the university and concludes that the university is a form of Foucauldian heterotopia mobilising diverse academic bodies and bodies of knowledge.http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0259-01902017000100009&lng=en&tlng=enmobilityausteritydisruptionnetwork capitalheterotopia
spellingShingle Bradley Rink
Mobile heterotopia: movement, circulation and the function of the university
Kronos
mobility
austerity
disruption
network capital
heterotopia
title Mobile heterotopia: movement, circulation and the function of the university
title_full Mobile heterotopia: movement, circulation and the function of the university
title_fullStr Mobile heterotopia: movement, circulation and the function of the university
title_full_unstemmed Mobile heterotopia: movement, circulation and the function of the university
title_short Mobile heterotopia: movement, circulation and the function of the university
title_sort mobile heterotopia movement circulation and the function of the university
topic mobility
austerity
disruption
network capital
heterotopia
url http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0259-01902017000100009&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT bradleyrink mobileheterotopiamovementcirculationandthefunctionoftheuniversity