3D CT Analysis of Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Symmetry

Category: Ankle, Trauma Introduction/Purpose: As medical imaging of the syndesmosis prior to ankle injury is usually not available, researchers have diagnosed and surgically reduced syndesmotic disruptions based on presumed symmetry with the healthy contralateral limb. The purposes of this study are...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel Hoopes MD, MS, Bruce Sangeorzan MD, William Ledoux PhD, Connor Pihl MD, BS, Kylie Edinger BSc(Med), Matthew Kindig MSc
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2017-09-01
Series:Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011417S000049
_version_ 1818350495102664704
author Daniel Hoopes MD, MS
Bruce Sangeorzan MD
William Ledoux PhD
Connor Pihl MD, BS
Kylie Edinger BSc(Med)
Matthew Kindig MSc
author_facet Daniel Hoopes MD, MS
Bruce Sangeorzan MD
William Ledoux PhD
Connor Pihl MD, BS
Kylie Edinger BSc(Med)
Matthew Kindig MSc
author_sort Daniel Hoopes MD, MS
collection DOAJ
description Category: Ankle, Trauma Introduction/Purpose: As medical imaging of the syndesmosis prior to ankle injury is usually not available, researchers have diagnosed and surgically reduced syndesmotic disruptions based on presumed symmetry with the healthy contralateral limb. The purposes of this study are to quantify the degree of symmetry present in the DTFS using 3D CT modeling, and to compare the accuracy of common clinical two-dimensional (2D) measurements to 3D CT measurements for assessing syndesmotic symmetry and measuring diastasis. Methods: Bilateral lower limb CT (n=65) were assessed, were segmented, and reconstructed into 3D surface models, and an anatomically-defined coordinate system was applied to orient the 3D models uniformly. Symmetry was assessed three- dimensionally to overlap the left and right. The relative differences between the two fibulae were quantified in six degrees of freedom. For comparative purposes, four 2D measures were also measured. These measures included anteroposterior (AP), mediolateral (ML), and rotational displacement of the fibula relative to the tibia, measured using axial CT, and longitudinal displacement, measured using coronal radiographs. The four measures were automatically calculated using custom software to reduce the influence of inter- and intra-rater variability. The absolute difference was calculated for each 3D and 2D measure. The differences measured represent the amount of translation or rotation needed to match the position of the left fibula to the position of the right fibula after reflection and optimal tibial alignment. Results: The mean difference in AP displacement was approximately double the mean difference in ML displacement for the 2D measurements (1.65 mm vs 0.71 mm), while AP and ML displacement differences for the 3D measurements were comparable (0.57 mm and 0.44 mm). As a general trend, the 2D measurements exhibited larger values of absolute differences than the 3D measurements. The average difference in fibular rotation detected was larger for the 2D measurements (6.1°) than the 3D measurements (0.59°). . The 2D AP displacement differences varied between 1.41 -1.95 mm (95% CI), which is beyond the suggested 1 mm tolerance level. The 3D analog of this measurement varied between 0.47-0.70 mm (95% CI), which is within the suggested threshold. Conclusion: Some clinical reports suggest that 1 mm misalignment can cause pain and require surgical revision, but detecting asymmetry below 1 mm is limited by the quality of clinical 2D imaging. Our findings suggest that the current standard practice of using 2D measures to assess the DTFS may exaggerate the amount of asymmetry present, which may lead to misdiagnoses and subsequent surgical revisions. Natural symmetry exists in uninjured syndesmoses. More accurate comparisons of syndesmotic alignment may be needed to determine the accuracy of DTFS diastasis.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T18:22:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4bcc9d5701be429f8f88bacdae0674db
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2473-0114
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T18:22:45Z
publishDate 2017-09-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
spelling doaj.art-4bcc9d5701be429f8f88bacdae0674db2022-12-21T23:35:40ZengSAGE PublishingFoot & Ankle Orthopaedics2473-01142017-09-01210.1177/2473011417S0000493D CT Analysis of Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis SymmetryDaniel Hoopes MD, MSBruce Sangeorzan MDWilliam Ledoux PhDConnor Pihl MD, BSKylie Edinger BSc(Med)Matthew Kindig MScCategory: Ankle, Trauma Introduction/Purpose: As medical imaging of the syndesmosis prior to ankle injury is usually not available, researchers have diagnosed and surgically reduced syndesmotic disruptions based on presumed symmetry with the healthy contralateral limb. The purposes of this study are to quantify the degree of symmetry present in the DTFS using 3D CT modeling, and to compare the accuracy of common clinical two-dimensional (2D) measurements to 3D CT measurements for assessing syndesmotic symmetry and measuring diastasis. Methods: Bilateral lower limb CT (n=65) were assessed, were segmented, and reconstructed into 3D surface models, and an anatomically-defined coordinate system was applied to orient the 3D models uniformly. Symmetry was assessed three- dimensionally to overlap the left and right. The relative differences between the two fibulae were quantified in six degrees of freedom. For comparative purposes, four 2D measures were also measured. These measures included anteroposterior (AP), mediolateral (ML), and rotational displacement of the fibula relative to the tibia, measured using axial CT, and longitudinal displacement, measured using coronal radiographs. The four measures were automatically calculated using custom software to reduce the influence of inter- and intra-rater variability. The absolute difference was calculated for each 3D and 2D measure. The differences measured represent the amount of translation or rotation needed to match the position of the left fibula to the position of the right fibula after reflection and optimal tibial alignment. Results: The mean difference in AP displacement was approximately double the mean difference in ML displacement for the 2D measurements (1.65 mm vs 0.71 mm), while AP and ML displacement differences for the 3D measurements were comparable (0.57 mm and 0.44 mm). As a general trend, the 2D measurements exhibited larger values of absolute differences than the 3D measurements. The average difference in fibular rotation detected was larger for the 2D measurements (6.1°) than the 3D measurements (0.59°). . The 2D AP displacement differences varied between 1.41 -1.95 mm (95% CI), which is beyond the suggested 1 mm tolerance level. The 3D analog of this measurement varied between 0.47-0.70 mm (95% CI), which is within the suggested threshold. Conclusion: Some clinical reports suggest that 1 mm misalignment can cause pain and require surgical revision, but detecting asymmetry below 1 mm is limited by the quality of clinical 2D imaging. Our findings suggest that the current standard practice of using 2D measures to assess the DTFS may exaggerate the amount of asymmetry present, which may lead to misdiagnoses and subsequent surgical revisions. Natural symmetry exists in uninjured syndesmoses. More accurate comparisons of syndesmotic alignment may be needed to determine the accuracy of DTFS diastasis.https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011417S000049
spellingShingle Daniel Hoopes MD, MS
Bruce Sangeorzan MD
William Ledoux PhD
Connor Pihl MD, BS
Kylie Edinger BSc(Med)
Matthew Kindig MSc
3D CT Analysis of Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Symmetry
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
title 3D CT Analysis of Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Symmetry
title_full 3D CT Analysis of Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Symmetry
title_fullStr 3D CT Analysis of Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Symmetry
title_full_unstemmed 3D CT Analysis of Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Symmetry
title_short 3D CT Analysis of Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Symmetry
title_sort 3d ct analysis of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis symmetry
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011417S000049
work_keys_str_mv AT danielhoopesmdms 3dctanalysisofdistaltibiofibularsyndesmosissymmetry
AT brucesangeorzanmd 3dctanalysisofdistaltibiofibularsyndesmosissymmetry
AT williamledouxphd 3dctanalysisofdistaltibiofibularsyndesmosissymmetry
AT connorpihlmdbs 3dctanalysisofdistaltibiofibularsyndesmosissymmetry
AT kylieedingerbscmed 3dctanalysisofdistaltibiofibularsyndesmosissymmetry
AT matthewkindigmsc 3dctanalysisofdistaltibiofibularsyndesmosissymmetry