An Integrative Engagement Model of Digital Psychotherapy: Exploratory Focus Group Findings

BackgroundDigital mental health interventions, such as 2-way and asynchronous messaging therapy, are a growing part of the mental health care treatment ecosystem, yet little is known about how users engage with these interventions over the course of their treatment journeys....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: James M Zech, Morgan Johnson, Michael D Pullmann, Thomas D Hull, Tim Althoff, Sean A Munson, Nicole Fridling, Boris Litvin, Jerilyn Wu, Patricia A Areán
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2023-04-01
Series:JMIR Formative Research
Online Access:https://formative.jmir.org/2023/1/e41428
_version_ 1797734090663788544
author James M Zech
Morgan Johnson
Michael D Pullmann
Thomas D Hull
Tim Althoff
Sean A Munson
Nicole Fridling
Boris Litvin
Jerilyn Wu
Patricia A Areán
author_facet James M Zech
Morgan Johnson
Michael D Pullmann
Thomas D Hull
Tim Althoff
Sean A Munson
Nicole Fridling
Boris Litvin
Jerilyn Wu
Patricia A Areán
author_sort James M Zech
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundDigital mental health interventions, such as 2-way and asynchronous messaging therapy, are a growing part of the mental health care treatment ecosystem, yet little is known about how users engage with these interventions over the course of their treatment journeys. User engagement, or client behaviors and therapeutic relationships that facilitate positive treatment outcomes, is a necessary condition for the effectiveness of any digital treatment. Developing a better understanding of the factors that impact user engagement can impact the overall effectiveness of digital psychotherapy. Mapping the user experience in digital therapy may be facilitated by integrating theories from several fields. Specifically, health science’s Health Action Process Approach and human-computer interaction’s Lived Informatics Model may be usefully synthesized with relational constructs from psychotherapy process–outcome research to identify the determinants of engagement in digital messaging therapy. ObjectiveThis study aims to capture insights into digital therapy users’ engagement patterns through a qualitative analysis of focus group sessions. We aimed to synthesize emergent intrapersonal and relational determinants of engagement into an integrative framework of engagement in digital therapy. MethodsA total of 24 focus group participants were recruited to participate in 1 of 5 synchronous focus group sessions held between October and November 2021. Participant responses were coded by 2 researchers using thematic analysis. ResultsCoders identified 10 relevant constructs and 24 subconstructs that can collectively account for users’ engagement and experience trajectories in the context of digital therapy. Although users’ engagement trajectories in digital therapy varied widely, they were principally informed by intrapsychic factors (eg, self-efficacy and outcome expectancy), interpersonal factors (eg, the therapeutic alliance and its rupture), and external factors (eg, treatment costs and social support). These constructs were organized into a proposed Integrative Engagement Model of Digital Psychotherapy. Notably, every participant in the focus groups indicated that their ability to connect with their therapist was among the most important factors that were considered in continuing or terminating treatment. ConclusionsEngagement in messaging therapy may be usefully approached through an interdisciplinary lens, linking constructs from health science, human-computer interaction studies, and clinical science in an integrative engagement framework. Taken together, our results suggest that users may not view the digital psychotherapy platform itself as a treatment so much as a means of gaining access to a helping provider, that is, users did not see themselves as engaging with a platform but instead viewed their experience as a healing relationship. The findings of this study suggest that a better understanding of user engagement is crucial for enhancing the effectiveness of digital mental health interventions, and future research should continue to explore the underlying factors that contribute to engagement in digital mental health interventions. Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04507360; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04507360
first_indexed 2024-03-12T12:39:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4bd49665281c44bda37325c8898b5db4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2561-326X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T12:39:15Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format Article
series JMIR Formative Research
spelling doaj.art-4bd49665281c44bda37325c8898b5db42023-08-28T23:57:37ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR Formative Research2561-326X2023-04-017e4142810.2196/41428An Integrative Engagement Model of Digital Psychotherapy: Exploratory Focus Group FindingsJames M Zechhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8726-1884Morgan Johnsonhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2081-6176Michael D Pullmannhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8404-864XThomas D Hullhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8275-6765Tim Althoffhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4793-2289Sean A Munsonhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0472-6138Nicole Fridlinghttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3647-0181Boris Litvinhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4710-8417Jerilyn Wuhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2576-4456Patricia A Areánhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5971-6319 BackgroundDigital mental health interventions, such as 2-way and asynchronous messaging therapy, are a growing part of the mental health care treatment ecosystem, yet little is known about how users engage with these interventions over the course of their treatment journeys. User engagement, or client behaviors and therapeutic relationships that facilitate positive treatment outcomes, is a necessary condition for the effectiveness of any digital treatment. Developing a better understanding of the factors that impact user engagement can impact the overall effectiveness of digital psychotherapy. Mapping the user experience in digital therapy may be facilitated by integrating theories from several fields. Specifically, health science’s Health Action Process Approach and human-computer interaction’s Lived Informatics Model may be usefully synthesized with relational constructs from psychotherapy process–outcome research to identify the determinants of engagement in digital messaging therapy. ObjectiveThis study aims to capture insights into digital therapy users’ engagement patterns through a qualitative analysis of focus group sessions. We aimed to synthesize emergent intrapersonal and relational determinants of engagement into an integrative framework of engagement in digital therapy. MethodsA total of 24 focus group participants were recruited to participate in 1 of 5 synchronous focus group sessions held between October and November 2021. Participant responses were coded by 2 researchers using thematic analysis. ResultsCoders identified 10 relevant constructs and 24 subconstructs that can collectively account for users’ engagement and experience trajectories in the context of digital therapy. Although users’ engagement trajectories in digital therapy varied widely, they were principally informed by intrapsychic factors (eg, self-efficacy and outcome expectancy), interpersonal factors (eg, the therapeutic alliance and its rupture), and external factors (eg, treatment costs and social support). These constructs were organized into a proposed Integrative Engagement Model of Digital Psychotherapy. Notably, every participant in the focus groups indicated that their ability to connect with their therapist was among the most important factors that were considered in continuing or terminating treatment. ConclusionsEngagement in messaging therapy may be usefully approached through an interdisciplinary lens, linking constructs from health science, human-computer interaction studies, and clinical science in an integrative engagement framework. Taken together, our results suggest that users may not view the digital psychotherapy platform itself as a treatment so much as a means of gaining access to a helping provider, that is, users did not see themselves as engaging with a platform but instead viewed their experience as a healing relationship. The findings of this study suggest that a better understanding of user engagement is crucial for enhancing the effectiveness of digital mental health interventions, and future research should continue to explore the underlying factors that contribute to engagement in digital mental health interventions. Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04507360; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04507360https://formative.jmir.org/2023/1/e41428
spellingShingle James M Zech
Morgan Johnson
Michael D Pullmann
Thomas D Hull
Tim Althoff
Sean A Munson
Nicole Fridling
Boris Litvin
Jerilyn Wu
Patricia A Areán
An Integrative Engagement Model of Digital Psychotherapy: Exploratory Focus Group Findings
JMIR Formative Research
title An Integrative Engagement Model of Digital Psychotherapy: Exploratory Focus Group Findings
title_full An Integrative Engagement Model of Digital Psychotherapy: Exploratory Focus Group Findings
title_fullStr An Integrative Engagement Model of Digital Psychotherapy: Exploratory Focus Group Findings
title_full_unstemmed An Integrative Engagement Model of Digital Psychotherapy: Exploratory Focus Group Findings
title_short An Integrative Engagement Model of Digital Psychotherapy: Exploratory Focus Group Findings
title_sort integrative engagement model of digital psychotherapy exploratory focus group findings
url https://formative.jmir.org/2023/1/e41428
work_keys_str_mv AT jamesmzech anintegrativeengagementmodelofdigitalpsychotherapyexploratoryfocusgroupfindings
AT morganjohnson anintegrativeengagementmodelofdigitalpsychotherapyexploratoryfocusgroupfindings
AT michaeldpullmann anintegrativeengagementmodelofdigitalpsychotherapyexploratoryfocusgroupfindings
AT thomasdhull anintegrativeengagementmodelofdigitalpsychotherapyexploratoryfocusgroupfindings
AT timalthoff anintegrativeengagementmodelofdigitalpsychotherapyexploratoryfocusgroupfindings
AT seanamunson anintegrativeengagementmodelofdigitalpsychotherapyexploratoryfocusgroupfindings
AT nicolefridling anintegrativeengagementmodelofdigitalpsychotherapyexploratoryfocusgroupfindings
AT borislitvin anintegrativeengagementmodelofdigitalpsychotherapyexploratoryfocusgroupfindings
AT jerilynwu anintegrativeengagementmodelofdigitalpsychotherapyexploratoryfocusgroupfindings
AT patriciaaarean anintegrativeengagementmodelofdigitalpsychotherapyexploratoryfocusgroupfindings
AT jamesmzech integrativeengagementmodelofdigitalpsychotherapyexploratoryfocusgroupfindings
AT morganjohnson integrativeengagementmodelofdigitalpsychotherapyexploratoryfocusgroupfindings
AT michaeldpullmann integrativeengagementmodelofdigitalpsychotherapyexploratoryfocusgroupfindings
AT thomasdhull integrativeengagementmodelofdigitalpsychotherapyexploratoryfocusgroupfindings
AT timalthoff integrativeengagementmodelofdigitalpsychotherapyexploratoryfocusgroupfindings
AT seanamunson integrativeengagementmodelofdigitalpsychotherapyexploratoryfocusgroupfindings
AT nicolefridling integrativeengagementmodelofdigitalpsychotherapyexploratoryfocusgroupfindings
AT borislitvin integrativeengagementmodelofdigitalpsychotherapyexploratoryfocusgroupfindings
AT jerilynwu integrativeengagementmodelofdigitalpsychotherapyexploratoryfocusgroupfindings
AT patriciaaarean integrativeengagementmodelofdigitalpsychotherapyexploratoryfocusgroupfindings