Thrombophilia testing in people with venous thromboembolism: systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis

Objectives: To assess whether thrombophilia testing following a venous thrombotic event is clinically effective and cost-effective in the management of thrombosis compared with no testing for thrombophilia. Data sources: Major electronic databases were searched from September to November 2006. Revie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: EL Simpson, MD Stevenson, A Rawdin, D Papaioannou
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: NIHR Journals Library 2009-01-01
Series:Health Technology Assessment
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3310/hta13020
_version_ 1818478828092129280
author EL Simpson
MD Stevenson
A Rawdin
D Papaioannou
author_facet EL Simpson
MD Stevenson
A Rawdin
D Papaioannou
author_sort EL Simpson
collection DOAJ
description Objectives: To assess whether thrombophilia testing following a venous thrombotic event is clinically effective and cost-effective in the management of thrombosis compared with no testing for thrombophilia. Data sources: Major electronic databases were searched from September to November 2006. Review methods: A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness literature was undertaken according to standard methods. A discrete event simulation model was constructed to assess the cost-effectiveness of changing the standard 3-month duration of warfarin treatment to 10 years, 20 years or lifelong. Results: No clinical studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. Further literature searches and clinical opinion were therefore used to inform the cost-effectiveness analysis. Thrombophilia testing in patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) had an estimated mean cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) of below £20,000 regardless of sex or age. In patients with a previous deep vein thrombosis (DVT), thrombophilia testing had an estimated mean cost per QALY of below £20,000 in men aged 69 years or less and in women aged 49 years or less. The estimated duration of warfarin treatment (lifelong, 20 years, 10 years or no extended treatment) that was most cost-effective is presented for each age, sex, initial venous thromboembolism (VTE) event and type of thrombophilia. Conclusions: In terms of determining the duration of anticoagulation management, scenarios were found in which the cost per QALY of thrombophilia testing was below £20,000. However, these results are subject to great uncertainty, largely because of lack of knowledge about the increased risk of recurrence with each type of thrombophilia. Results are influenced by the fact that men have a greater risk of recurrence than women and by the fact that the frequency of adverse events associated with warfarin treatment increases with age. Further research, for example on the likely sensitivity and specificity of the tests for specific types of thrombophilia, is needed to reduce the uncertainty associated with these results. Studies comparing patients with VTE tested for thrombophilia with those whose risk assessment was based on personal and family history of thrombosis would also be beneficial.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T09:53:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4bdc64fa3b8e427da0b1e3d89043116b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1366-5278
2046-4924
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T09:53:00Z
publishDate 2009-01-01
publisher NIHR Journals Library
record_format Article
series Health Technology Assessment
spelling doaj.art-4bdc64fa3b8e427da0b1e3d89043116b2022-12-22T01:53:36ZengNIHR Journals LibraryHealth Technology Assessment1366-52782046-49242009-01-0113210.3310/hta1302006/66/01Thrombophilia testing in people with venous thromboembolism: systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysisEL Simpson0MD Stevenson1A Rawdin2D Papaioannou3The University of Sheffield, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), UKThe University of Sheffield, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), UKThe University of Sheffield, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), UKThe University of Sheffield, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), UKObjectives: To assess whether thrombophilia testing following a venous thrombotic event is clinically effective and cost-effective in the management of thrombosis compared with no testing for thrombophilia. Data sources: Major electronic databases were searched from September to November 2006. Review methods: A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness literature was undertaken according to standard methods. A discrete event simulation model was constructed to assess the cost-effectiveness of changing the standard 3-month duration of warfarin treatment to 10 years, 20 years or lifelong. Results: No clinical studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. Further literature searches and clinical opinion were therefore used to inform the cost-effectiveness analysis. Thrombophilia testing in patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) had an estimated mean cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) of below £20,000 regardless of sex or age. In patients with a previous deep vein thrombosis (DVT), thrombophilia testing had an estimated mean cost per QALY of below £20,000 in men aged 69 years or less and in women aged 49 years or less. The estimated duration of warfarin treatment (lifelong, 20 years, 10 years or no extended treatment) that was most cost-effective is presented for each age, sex, initial venous thromboembolism (VTE) event and type of thrombophilia. Conclusions: In terms of determining the duration of anticoagulation management, scenarios were found in which the cost per QALY of thrombophilia testing was below £20,000. However, these results are subject to great uncertainty, largely because of lack of knowledge about the increased risk of recurrence with each type of thrombophilia. Results are influenced by the fact that men have a greater risk of recurrence than women and by the fact that the frequency of adverse events associated with warfarin treatment increases with age. Further research, for example on the likely sensitivity and specificity of the tests for specific types of thrombophilia, is needed to reduce the uncertainty associated with these results. Studies comparing patients with VTE tested for thrombophilia with those whose risk assessment was based on personal and family history of thrombosis would also be beneficial.https://doi.org/10.3310/hta13020thrombophilia-testingvenous-thromboembolismpulmonary-embolismdeep-vein-thrombosiswarfarin
spellingShingle EL Simpson
MD Stevenson
A Rawdin
D Papaioannou
Thrombophilia testing in people with venous thromboembolism: systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis
Health Technology Assessment
thrombophilia-testing
venous-thromboembolism
pulmonary-embolism
deep-vein-thrombosis
warfarin
title Thrombophilia testing in people with venous thromboembolism: systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis
title_full Thrombophilia testing in people with venous thromboembolism: systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis
title_fullStr Thrombophilia testing in people with venous thromboembolism: systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis
title_full_unstemmed Thrombophilia testing in people with venous thromboembolism: systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis
title_short Thrombophilia testing in people with venous thromboembolism: systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis
title_sort thrombophilia testing in people with venous thromboembolism systematic review and cost effectiveness analysis
topic thrombophilia-testing
venous-thromboembolism
pulmonary-embolism
deep-vein-thrombosis
warfarin
url https://doi.org/10.3310/hta13020
work_keys_str_mv AT elsimpson thrombophiliatestinginpeoplewithvenousthromboembolismsystematicreviewandcosteffectivenessanalysis
AT mdstevenson thrombophiliatestinginpeoplewithvenousthromboembolismsystematicreviewandcosteffectivenessanalysis
AT arawdin thrombophiliatestinginpeoplewithvenousthromboembolismsystematicreviewandcosteffectivenessanalysis
AT dpapaioannou thrombophiliatestinginpeoplewithvenousthromboembolismsystematicreviewandcosteffectivenessanalysis